Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 19, 2024, 1:14 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Science Porn
RE: Science Porn
It's enough to be reasonably sure, but with the exponential nature of the equation, even extremely close approximations get blown up.

But you're probably right, there is probably a proof possible without explicit calculation.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great

PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Reply
RE: Science Porn
(September 4, 2016 at 6:11 am)SteelCurtain Wrote: It's enough to be reasonably sure, but with the exponential nature of the equation, even extremely close approximations get blown up.

But you're probably right, there is probably a proof possible without explicit calculation.

Oh no doubt it would be a nightmare to control the precision, but once you have a handle on that and you've gotten to the first digit after the decimal point, and it is nonvanishing within your precision, you're done - it's just if you get .000000..., you can never be sure that there won't be something else, is all I was saying
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
RE: Science Porn
Surely it should be possible...
http://www.cut-the-knot.org/do_you_know/irrat.shtml
Reply
RE: Science Porn
Have you ever wondered how to count up to 31 with only one hand?

BINARY!!

[Image: 14604856_1300155306664026_16294000912989...e=5861C48E]


If you use two hands, you can go up to 1023! Big Grin



Reply
RE: Science Porn
4 you, man!
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great

PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Reply
RE: Science Porn
(October 23, 2016 at 5:28 pm)pocaracas Wrote: Have you ever wondered how to count up to 31 with only one hand?

BINARY!!

[Image: 14604856_1300155306664026_16294000912989...e=5861C48E]


If you use two hands, you can go up to 1023! Big Grin




This is fucking awesome. Pity it would take too much of my time and energy to learn in practice.

In theory it's absolutely intellectually delicious and logically delectable.
Reply
RE: Science Porn
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TnzcwTyr6cE
Reply
RE: Science Porn
(October 23, 2016 at 5:28 pm)pocaracas Wrote: Have you ever wondered how to count up to 31 with only one hand?

BINARY!!

[Image: 14604856_1300155306664026_16294000912989...e=5861C48E]


If you use two hands, you can go up to 1023! Big Grin




Digital binary. Cool!
If you get to thinking you’re a person of some influence, try ordering somebody else’s dog around.
Reply
RE: Science Porn
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o268qbb_0BM
Reply
RE: Science Porn
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDRWQUUUCF0
"Leave it to me to find a way to be,
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting,
I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)