GOD EXISTS

[One Above All]

He's dead, Jim.

What a surprise....

He was like other guy, Veegtron, or something like that.

I have a feeling he/she will be back...

[Elskidor]

I use to do drugs too.

[Zidneya]

Science is the observation of nature.
All things in nature seek balance.
Balance is the seeking of equilibrium.
_______________________________
This is observable in all things in nature.

And this proves that there is an all mighty spiritual deity that give us a purpose and takes logical decisions of our fate how exactly?

Matter is Vibration
Vibration is Wave
Wave is Motion
Motion is the seeking of Balance
Balance is the seeking of Equilibrium
Equilibrium is Stillness
Stillness is Eternal
Eternity is God.

That last one statement that God is eternal it's an assumption from both points of view
scientific:

How can you argument that God is eternal if you can't even proof there is even a god in the first place.

and religious:

"If you can say describe anything about he who surpasses every thought and word, how can you explain anything about him?"

Besides I always thought that eternal is the continuing series of events and never terminable actions that happen throughout time. In any scientific statement I've never hear that any never-ending action is God.

When ever you define what something "is"
You are saying what something "equals"
"Is" means "To Equal"

God is an Idea. There you go it wasn't that hard.

Equilibrium is the basis of all language, math and science.
God is the basis of all language, math and science.

How do you know that God is equilibrium?

God is Eternal Equilibrium.

Again how do you know that?

God is Light

Wait I thought that God was Equilibrium?
Also what now? If God is light then Dark Matter is from the devil?

The Universe is Music

Yeah em… I heard someone else say the same thing once before. It was a little hairy elf that appeared in the He-Man and the Masters of the Universe (film). I didn't believed him either.

Balance is Universal Law.
I, Shen Hui Zhang, am the first human being in the history of the human race to balance the periodic table of elements.

Why do I have the feeling that if we ask Shen Hui Zhang to give us his opinion of how someone else uses his work to prove there is a God he ain't gonna be very happy.
If you put God behind every inexplicable data you have you are just conforming instead of questioning. The very foundations of science is skepticism not religion YOU WORDS SIR ARE AN INSULT TO SCIENCE.


I write this because in a recent study it is written that banned users from online communities tend to still watch the comments of their articles.

[ska88]

Well... we can say deep way of thinking.. really, I thought of something like that before.. who knows?

But the thing is that .. no one can say this is 100% true.. God only knows.

But I think that God wants us to search too.. and that can be seen as a new hypothesis that needs special thinking.

Good Luck

---

what I really want to say for the rest of you .. Why sarcasm ?

Wether he was right of wrong only wit people can understand his intelligent way of thinking.. and shallow people who think only "inside the box" can NEVER understand the yearning for the truth and knowledge.

Even if you have different ideas .. you can still discuss and change knowledge without segregation and arrogance.

Thats ignorance.

[One Above All]

Well... we can say deep way of thinking.. really, I thought of something like that before.. who knows?

Very deep... Did you miss the part where I proved I was God using the same logic? Then a member confirmed it with a few commands on Python.

But the thing is that .. no one can say this is 100% true.. God only knows.

So nobody can say, since imaginary beings don't really know anything other than what the people imagining them know.

But I think that God wants us to search too.. and that can be seen as a new hypothesis that needs special thinking.

You do realize that this "special thinking" is... you know, "special thinking", right?
In case that wasn't clear, I'm saying they're the thoughts of someone who's severely brain damaged.

what I really want to say for the rest of you .. Why sarcasm ?

Because the OP was a spammer who didn't reply to anything that was said; just posted some admittedly pleasant pictures (if you ignore the text on them) along with "logic" that could only come from a vacuum.

Wether he was right of wrong only wit people can understand his intelligent way of thinking.. and shallow people who think only "inside the box" can NEVER understand the yearning for the truth and knowledge.

It's the other way around, sort of. Only people with an IQ lower than 20 (google it to see why I picked this very specific value) can understand his dumb way of thinking. Either that or people with an IQ over 200 who have studied psychology for decades and therefore can understand just about any way of thinking.

Even if you have different ideas .. you can still discuss and change knowledge without segregation and arrogance.

You are conflating arrogance with confidence. His ideas are stupid. That's all there is to it. If you were honest, you'd think the same thing.

Thats ignorance.

No. It's called "having a bullshit filter inside your skull". In other words, "not being gullible".
You should look into what being open-minded really is.

[Esquilax]

what I really want to say for the rest of you .. Why sarcasm ?

Because when someone's content to just enter into our space and, without even introducing themselves, launch into a series of wide ranging and only vaguely connected assertions, supplementing that with contextless diagrams that are nothing but assertions themselves with portentous imagery pasted over sciency stuff, well... what else do you want?

The guy was acting ridiculous, and hence he invited ridicule.

Wether he was right of wrong only wit people can understand his intelligent way of thinking.. and shallow people who think only "inside the box" can NEVER understand the yearning for the truth and knowledge.

I think we all understand the yearning. It's just that some of us also understand that the best way to obtain truth isn't to twist the evidence toward a given conclusion.

And I think we're at least willing to offer some modicum of respect to those who'd twist it competently, something the OP was not doing.

Even if you have different ideas .. you can still discuss and change knowledge without segregation and arrogance.

Thats ignorance.

You should probably tell that to the OP: at least we regular members bothered to respond to him. I didn't exactly see the same courtesy being returned to us, and you're saying we were the ones unwilling to discuss things?

Honestly, this forum is full of threads, pages long, from people discussing ideas under the assumption that the discussion would be both ways, and not just a soapbox for some anonymous theist. The only way you could possibly characterize us as unwilling to discuss is by ignoring the majority of the boards. Get your head out of your ass.

[Raeven]

All I got out of it was that somehow god was yellow. Yellow is the color of urine and later, it was shown that god is bisexual. So I felt better.

[downbeatplumb]

All I got out of it was that somehow god was yellow. Yellow is the color of urine and later, it was shown that god is bisexual. So I felt better.

Didn't zeus once rain down on someone as a "golden shower"?

DANAE was a princess of Argos in the Greek Peloponessos, a daughter of King Akrisios. When her father learned a prophecy that he was destined to be killed by a son of his daughter, he locked Danae away in a subterranean, bronze chamber. Her prison, however, was easily infiltrated by the god Zeus who impregnated her in the guise of a golden shower. She conceived and bore him a son named Perseus.

http://www.theoi.com/Heroine/Danae.html

[Cyberman]

Matter is Vibration
Vibration is Wave
Wave is Motion
Motion is the seeking of Balance
Balance is the seeking of Equilibrium
Equilibrium is Stillness
Stillness is Eternal
Eternity is God.

The Universe is expanding constantly
Expansion is change
Constant change is incompatible with equilibrium
Since equilibrium =stillness=eternal=“God“, this “God“ cannot exist in this Universe.

Congratulations on disproving “God“. Your Nobel is in the mail.

[Whateverist]

Matter is Vibration
Vibration is Wave
Wave is Motion

Motion is the seeking of Balance
Balance is the seeking of Equilibrium

Equilibrium is Stillness
Stillness is Eternal
Eternity is God.

Let me see if I follow the gist of the argument here:

word 1 = word 2
word 2 = word 3
yada
yada
yada
therefore word 1 = word n

Evaluation: so long as you use each word in a loosely defined manner for poetic effect you should be safe from making any mistake. But it may rule out the possibility that you've actually said anything at all.