Posts: 30129
Threads: 304
Joined: April 18, 2014
Reputation:
91
Jesus and the money changers
July 24, 2014 at 11:54 am
Jesus seemed quite put out over the money changers at the temple, pretty much his only act of violence, curiously.
However, in Matthew 19, when asked about the 10 Commandments;
18 He saith unto him, Which? Jesus said, Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness,
19 Honour thy father and thy mother: and, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
In view of that, I am hard pressed to see where the money changers were screwing up. Am I missing something, or is Jesus, for lack of a better term, inconsistent ?
Posts: 4664
Threads: 100
Joined: November 22, 2013
Reputation:
39
RE: Jesus and the money changers
July 24, 2014 at 12:12 pm
I don't think he cared about what they were doing but rather where they were doing it.
Posts: 2471
Threads: 21
Joined: December 7, 2013
Reputation:
43
RE: Jesus and the money changers
July 24, 2014 at 12:39 pm
Jesus was pissed at the money changers because they were selling imperfect sacrificial animals as if they were whole and clean. In effect, they were stealing by selling shoddy goods at premium prices.
Posts: 4484
Threads: 185
Joined: October 12, 2012
Reputation:
44
RE: Jesus and the money changers
July 24, 2014 at 12:56 pm
(July 24, 2014 at 11:54 am)vorlon13 Wrote: In view of that, I am hard pressed to see where the money changers were screwing up. Am I missing something, or is Jesus, for lack of a better term, inconsistent ? Well this event appears in all 4 gospels, so it very likely did happen. He accuses them of thieving, so whether this was by extortion, or simply by occupying the only space accessible to the unclean is unclear. The second explanation in my mind is favourable since they could provide services outside the temple.
Posts: 69246
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
258
RE: Jesus and the money changers
July 24, 2014 at 1:03 pm
Posts: 3644
Threads: 20
Joined: July 20, 2011
Reputation:
47
RE: Jesus and the money changers
July 24, 2014 at 2:21 pm
(July 24, 2014 at 12:56 pm)Aractus Wrote: Well this event appears in all 4 gospels, so it very likely did happen. He accuses them of thieving, so whether this was by extortion, or simply by occupying the only space accessible to the unclean is unclear. The second explanation in my mind is favourable since they could provide services outside the temple.
How did this actually happen? What were the logistics?
The Temple was 35 acres filled with livestock, vendors and money changers. There were also many Roman guards scattered around. Just to give you an idea, 35 acres is about the size of 26 American football fields.
So, just how is it possible that Jesus walked into the Temple, filled with guards, livestock, tables of other vendors, and drove out the money changers?
Also, wouldn't the money changers have their own guards to protect the money?
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
Posts: 5399
Threads: 256
Joined: December 1, 2013
Reputation:
60
RE: Jesus and the money changers
July 24, 2014 at 2:27 pm
(This post was last modified: July 24, 2014 at 2:27 pm by Mudhammam.)
(July 24, 2014 at 2:21 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: (July 24, 2014 at 12:56 pm)Aractus Wrote: Well this event appears in all 4 gospels, so it very likely did happen. He accuses them of thieving, so whether this was by extortion, or simply by occupying the only space accessible to the unclean is unclear. The second explanation in my mind is favourable since they could provide services outside the temple.
How did this actually happen? What were the logistics?
The Temple was 35 acres filled with livestock, vendors and money changers. There were also many Roman guards scattered around. Just to give you an idea, 35 acres is about the size of 26 American football fields.
So, just how is it possible that Jesus walked into the Temple, filled with guards, livestock, tables of other vendors, and drove out the money changers?
Also, wouldn't the money changers have their own guards to protect the money?
Well, the presence of Roman guards at least doesn't make it unbelievable--if I recall correctly, this was his final public act before they had him executed. So, that sort of disruption (assuming his followers joined in the racket)-- coupled with their proclamation that he was their equivalent to Caesar and assumption that he would lead the revolt that ushered in God's kingdom-- seems like sufficient cause for executing him by the manner they did, which was a punishment reserved for the worst of the worst, and included political adversaries.
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
Posts: 69246
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
258
RE: Jesus and the money changers
July 24, 2014 at 2:36 pm
I am unaware of any historical reference to Roman 'guards' at the fucking temple.
Why would they be there? To inflame the locals? There was a small Roman garrison at the Antonia Fortress near the temple. Close enough.
Posts: 2962
Threads: 44
Joined: March 22, 2013
Reputation:
39
RE: Jesus and the money changers
July 24, 2014 at 3:04 pm
(This post was last modified: July 24, 2014 at 3:05 pm by JesusHChrist.)
(July 24, 2014 at 2:21 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: How did this actually happen? What were the logistics?
Like Santy Claus delivering all those presents?
Or perhaps just a token money-changer-ass-whuppin'? Like painting a bridge, you clear out one money-changer, get on to the next and the next, and before you know it, the first money-changer is right back in there. Gots to start all over.
At least in my money-changer-ass-whuppin' experience.
Posts: 7568
Threads: 20
Joined: July 26, 2013
Reputation:
54
RE: Jesus and the money changers
July 24, 2014 at 3:07 pm
(July 24, 2014 at 2:27 pm)Pickup_shonuff Wrote: Well, the presence of Roman guards at least doesn't make it unbelievable--if I recall correctly, this was his final public act before they had him executed. So, that sort of disruption (assuming his followers joined in the racket)-- coupled with their proclamation that he was their equivalent to Caesar and assumption that he would lead the revolt that ushered in God's kingdom-- seems like sufficient cause for executing him by the manner they did, which was a punishment reserved for the worst of the worst, and included political adversaries.
I might be misremembering this, but I think it's the Synoptic Gospels that place this alleged event near the end of Jesus' life, while John places it earlier in his career.
|
