Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 13, 2024, 5:40 pm
Poll: What do you choose This poll is closed. |
|||
For Evolution | 44 | 93.62% | |
For Creation | 1 | 2.13% | |
Something else | 2 | 4.26% | |
Total | 47 vote(s) | 100% |
* You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
Thread Rating:
Evolution V Creation
|
(February 18, 2010 at 2:57 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote: Again, what?!?
Tavarish,
In the future if you want to show agreement you can just click the thumbs up button in the lower right corner. It amounts to the same thing and doesn't repost the same information. Rhizo
The thumbs up button (or "Kudos" button) also has a direct link to that user's ego, as displayed in tabular form here: http://atheistforums.org/topmembers.php
*Disappointed it isn't actually called ego*
As if my ego needs inflating.
Best regards,
Leo van Miert Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you RE: Evolution V Creation
February 19, 2010 at 2:23 am
(This post was last modified: February 19, 2010 at 2:24 am by theVOID.)
(February 17, 2010 at 7:11 am)Darwinian Wrote: My favourite proof for evolution being true is that it is a falsifiable scientific theory that has stood up to all the tests made of it and is backed up by at least 150 years of study made by countless intelligent, diligent and fastidious individuals who have dedicated their lives to the truth as opposed to creationism which is an ancient story written down by desert tribes people who simply couldn't have known any better that we are supposed to believe without question because is has been written down in an ancient book and must be true because it is the word of an omnipotent, omniscient entity who inspired the writing of this book that we know to be true because the book tells us so. Best evidence for evolution is the fossil record prediction that hippopotami and modern whales shared a common ancestor, Pakicetid, a jackal/cheetah/rat looking semi-aquatic animal - This was predicted 60 years before the genetic evidence not only confirmed it, but solidified the claim beyond reasonable doubt. (February 19, 2010 at 1:59 am)Shell B Wrote:(February 19, 2010 at 1:45 am)leo-rcc Wrote: As if my ego needs inflating. For all us non-wirters, pulling a Hemingway?
.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
My essay on evolution vs creation. | Yahweh | 11 | 4358 |
February 25, 2014 at 11:05 am Last Post: bennyboy |
|
Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth | Alter2Ego | 190 | 79213 |
August 23, 2013 at 6:14 am Last Post: pocaracas |
|
Intelligent design type evolution vs naturalism type evolution. | Mystic | 59 | 32375 |
April 6, 2013 at 5:12 pm Last Post: The Grand Nudger |
|
Need some help refuting this creation argument... | DaveSumm | 25 | 10804 |
January 12, 2013 at 7:16 am Last Post: Aractus |
|
Creation Museum | Manowar | 55 | 23304 |
April 20, 2011 at 3:14 pm Last Post: Thor |
|
Did man get here by evolution or by creation??? | solja247 | 10 | 6397 |
April 7, 2011 at 9:43 am Last Post: KichigaiNeko |
Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)