Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 27, 2015 at 3:19 am
Ok thank you, I see 
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 27, 2015 at 3:42 am
Ok let's get back on topic here! Less romance, more human banning!
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 27, 2015 at 3:45 am
Ban everyone! Ban everything! Ban the letter T and the number 9.
Thank you, drive through.
Posts: 7140
Threads: 12
Joined: March 14, 2013
Reputation:
72
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 27, 2015 at 8:41 am
(January 26, 2015 at 11:26 pm)Alice Wrote: This forum has gotten way way sexier in the last year. I can't turn a page without euphemism staring me in the face.
I've been blaming Losty, so that no one realizes that it's really me.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould
Posts: 28384
Threads: 226
Joined: March 24, 2014
Reputation:
185
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 27, 2015 at 9:14 am
(January 27, 2015 at 8:41 am)Tonus Wrote: (January 26, 2015 at 11:26 pm)Alice Wrote: This forum has gotten way way sexier in the last year. I can't turn a page without euphemism staring me in the face.
I've been blaming Losty, so that no one realizes that it's really me.
Banned because you only wish you could make this forum as sexy as I do. 
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay
0/10
Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Posts: 15755
Threads: 194
Joined: May 15, 2009
Reputation:
145
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 27, 2015 at 11:05 am
(This post was last modified: January 27, 2015 at 11:08 am by Violet.)
(January 27, 2015 at 3:09 am)robvalue Wrote: Can I ask what the redness is about? I seem to be ignorant about the colour scheme here. I know green is staff and blue is standard bum, but I'm not sure what red or purple or orange mean? Thanks
Purple means that you've contributed financially to keeping the forum running (within the last year? I don't remember).
(January 27, 2015 at 8:41 am)Tonus Wrote: I've been blaming Losty, so that no one realizes that it's really me.
I'm actually going to blame thesummerqueen for A69's establishment. She seems like a pretty good person to blame.
(January 27, 2015 at 9:14 am)Losty Wrote: Banned because you only wish you could make this forum as sexy as I do.
You haven't seen Tonus's left ankle yet... you've no grounds to comment, dearie~ 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rinz9Avvq6A
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
Posts: 2962
Threads: 44
Joined: March 22, 2013
Reputation:
39
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 27, 2015 at 11:33 am
(This post was last modified: January 27, 2015 at 11:34 am by JesusHChrist.)
(January 26, 2015 at 11:16 pm)Alice Wrote: Wait... weren't you banned?
* Alice is so freaking lost.
JHC has never been banned! Other than somewhat infrequent and plaintive crys from management to fix my @(#@*(*@(* quote tags, JHC tries to stay on the right side of the law.
You might be thinking of JesusChristLover. Easy to confuse us I suppose. One is a rabid anti-theist, loathing all manner of superstitious drivel.
The other has relationship issues with his wife, drinks like sailor,likes a bit of sheep sex now and again and loves (I mean loves! smootch smootch!) Jesus. The sky-daddy Jesus....go on and git a room you two. You're scaring the children.
Posts: 28555
Threads: 114
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation:
159
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 27, 2015 at 4:14 pm
(January 27, 2015 at 11:05 am)Alice Wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rinz9Avvq6A
Wikipedia Wrote:"He's So Fine" was written by Ronald Mack, an acquaintance of the Chiffons' members who set himself up as their manager after overhearing them sing in their high school's lunch room. Mack elicited the interest of Bright Tunes Corporation, a production company run by the Tokens who produced the Chiffons singing "He's So Fine" and two other Mack compositions at Capitol Recording Studios; the Tokens themselves - who'd never previously played on a recording session — provided the instrumentation, with the services of drummer Gary Chester.
Originally, "Oh, My Lover", one of the two other songs, was considered the potential hit but the completed track for "He's So Fine" with its now classic 'Doo-lang doo-lang doo-lang' background vocal — the suggestion of the session's sound engineer Johnny Cue — seemed an obvious smash, although Capitol Records for whom the Tokens were house producers rejected the track: Jay Siegal of the Tokens would recall Capitol president Voyle Gilmore dismissing the track as "too trite...too simple". The Tokens shopped "He's So Fine" to ten labels before placing it with Laurie Records. Siegal — "We played it and they locked the doors and said, 'You're not getting out of here. We want that record.'...Of course, we'd already been turned down by ten companies — give us eighty cents and we'd have given you the record."
Posts: 23918
Threads: 300
Joined: June 25, 2011
Reputation:
151
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 27, 2015 at 8:58 pm
(This post was last modified: January 27, 2015 at 9:00 pm by Whateverist.)
The pandas represent most of us when we first join the forums. The women in blue represent the mods.
http://youtu.be/cPi1LSi7WYw
Once we've been around a while, we can be more of a challenge.
http://youtu.be/Kvd-K6XCFfc
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 27, 2015 at 10:07 pm
Hence the black eyes. Where are the pandas on meth and vodka? That'd be far more realistic.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
|
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)
