Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 2, 2024, 5:33 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[split] Radiometric Dating
#61
RE: [split] Radiometric Dating
(November 24, 2014 at 11:14 am)Creatard Wrote:
(November 24, 2014 at 3:30 am)TubbyTubby Wrote: The phrases 'real world experiences' and 'pursue pastoral ministries' are not compatible.

Again, enough with the trolling.

'Snark' does not equal 'trolling'.

What led you to an atheist site for a science question instead of a science site? Consider this one:

http://www.scienceforums.com/

(November 24, 2014 at 12:03 pm)Creatard Wrote: Yes, because mission projects in Africa and South America have done nothing to improve water systems and housing

Nothing that can't be done without holy strings attached.

I'm no physicist, and I think someone already touched on this, but if decay rates were ever sped up to the rates needed to make the earth thousands of years old instead of 100s of millions of years old, wouldn't that cause a release of heat that would melt the earth's crust? Seems like geologists would pick up on an event like that.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
Reply
#62
RE: [split] Radiometric Dating
(November 24, 2014 at 5:34 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote:
(November 24, 2014 at 11:14 am)Creatard Wrote: Again, enough with the trolling.

'Snark' does not equal 'trolling'.

What led you to an atheist site for a science question instead of a science site? Consider this one:

http://www.scienceforums.com/

(November 24, 2014 at 12:03 pm)Creatard Wrote: Yes, because mission projects in Africa and South America have done nothing to improve water systems and housing

Nothing that can't be done without holy strings attached.

I'm no physicist, and I think someone already touched on this, but if decay rates were ever sped up to the rates needed to make the earth thousands of years old instead of 100s of millions of years old, wouldn't that cause a release of heat that would melt the earth's crust? Seems like geologists would pick up on an event like that.

It would melt the Earth's crust....unless there was a shit ton of water everywhere. Thinking Arguing like a creationist is kinda easy. I may go to another atheist forum and switch sides for giggles.
Reply
#63
RE: [split] Radiometric Dating
(November 24, 2014 at 5:34 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote:
(November 24, 2014 at 12:03 pm)Creatard Wrote: Yes, because mission projects in Africa and South America have done nothing to improve water systems and housing

Nothing that can't be done without holy strings attached.

And whatever said missionaris might have done pales in comparison to the anti gay legislation pushed through and the denial of condoms to allow an even wider spread of HIV.
[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]
Reply
#64
RE: [split] Radiometric Dating
Don't forget the literal witch hunts incited by american evangelicals in Africa!
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#65
RE: [split] Radiometric Dating
(November 24, 2014 at 5:34 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote:
(November 24, 2014 at 11:14 am)Creatard Wrote: Again, enough with the trolling.

'Snark' does not equal 'trolling'.

What led you to an atheist site for a science question instead of a science site? Consider this one:

http://www.scienceforums.com/

(November 24, 2014 at 12:03 pm)Creatard Wrote: Yes, because mission projects in Africa and South America have done nothing to improve water systems and housing

Nothing that can't be done without holy strings attached.

I'm no physicist, and I think someone already touched on this, but if decay rates were ever sped up to the rates needed to make the earth thousands of years old instead of 100s of millions of years old, wouldn't that cause a release of heat that would melt the earth's crust? Seems like geologists would pick up on an event like that.

How dare you allow math and physics stand in the way of bullshit from the very lips of he whom idiots assert to be god?

(November 24, 2014 at 6:18 pm)Exian Wrote:
(November 24, 2014 at 5:34 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: 'Snark' does not equal 'trolling'.

What led you to an atheist site for a science question instead of a science site? Consider this one:

http://www.scienceforums.com/


Nothing that can't be done without holy strings attached.

I'm no physicist, and I think someone already touched on this, but if decay rates were ever sped up to the rates needed to make the earth thousands of years old instead of 100s of millions of years old, wouldn't that cause a release of heat that would melt the earth's crust? Seems like geologists would pick up on an event like that.

It would melt the Earth's crust....unless there was a shit ton of water everywhere. Thinking Arguing like a creationist is kinda easy. I may go to another atheist forum and switch sides for giggles.

It can easily be shown that a ball of water the size of the earth would be boiled off completely many times over over by the heat released by radioactive decay that has occurred in the earth. If God unleashed a flood to cool the earth the flood water still had to have had million of years in which to slowly absorb radioactive heat and gradually radiate that heat into space if it were not to all flash into steam and cook Noah's ark.
Reply
#66
RE: [split] Radiometric Dating
(November 24, 2014 at 7:34 pm)Chuck Wrote: It can easily be shown that a ball of water the size of the earth would be boiled off completely many times over over by the heat released by radioactive decay that has occurred in the earth.

...and that the crust would still be molten, had such radioactive decay occurred over timescales that young earth crackpots assert.

That is, unless one is willing to invoke *magic*, in which case, I'd exit the conversation, because with magic, you can assert anything at all.
Reply
#67
RE: [split] Radiometric Dating
Don't all god propositions begin and end with magic?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#68
RE: [split] Radiometric Dating
(November 24, 2014 at 7:59 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Don't all god propositions begin and end with magic?

I expect it to be invoked at some point, yes - because science sure as fuck isn't on his side. I just want to see him admit that's what he's relying on.
Reply
#69
RE: [split] Radiometric Dating
(November 24, 2014 at 5:28 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote:
(November 24, 2014 at 2:37 am)Creatard Wrote: I was led to believe people would debate civilly on this site. If you don't have anything to add to the argument, kindly get off. Its funny you guys insist we are the intolerant and narrow minded ones.

We didn't come to a Christian community to make blatant over-generalizations about Christians, now did we? If we're not as kind and patient as you would prefer, blame the thousands of creationist trolls that preceded you and left us permanently on guard. If you're not a troll and you embody the change you want to see, most of us will eventually warm up to you.

He named himself Creatard. There is no "if" in my mind. There's no reason for such nonsense besides obvious trolling. He seems like one of Dave's stinky old socks to me anyways.
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply
#70
RE: [split] Radiometric Dating
(November 24, 2014 at 8:44 pm)Losty Wrote:
(November 24, 2014 at 5:28 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: We didn't come to a Christian community to make blatant over-generalizations about Christians, now did we? If we're not as kind and patient as you would prefer, blame the thousands of creationist trolls that preceded you and left us permanently on guard. If you're not a troll and you embody the change you want to see, most of us will eventually warm up to you.

He named himself Creatard. There is no "if" in my mind. There's no reason for such nonsense besides obvious trolling. He seems like one of Dave's stinky old socks to me anyways.

...and Dave seemed a lit like one of Edward's moldy socks.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Scientific Dating Blondie 22 4606 October 21, 2015 at 7:30 am
Last Post: Cyberman
  Research shows radiometric dating still reliable (again) orogenicman 7 3347 November 16, 2010 at 6:14 pm
Last Post: orogenicman
  Radiometric Dating littlegrimlin1 20 10483 November 28, 2009 at 2:20 am
Last Post: littlegrimlin1



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)