Newer Quran Translations
February 24, 2015 at 6:56 pm
(This post was last modified: February 24, 2015 at 7:32 pm by ReptilianPeon.)
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 31, 2026, 1:42 pm
Thread Rating:
|
Newer Quran Translations
|
|
I'm re-reading Robert Spencer's "Did Mohammed Exist" right now and in chapter 9 he is discussing how the earliest versions of the koran had similar problems.
Apparently, just like all religious horseshit, it says whatever the powers that be want it to say.
I don't know how to read arabic but I know that these days, Muslims who are into proving the quran is scientifically accurate tend to use this translation
Quote:Shakir On the quran website all other translations say six days. There are others but I can't remember now, it's been ages since I joined in a good Islam debate, I'm getting rusty. Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them. Impersonation is treason.
Hmm, I don't know anything about this, but to me it does sound like trying to sneak stuff in that wasn't there to make it more credible.
But really, it's so much of a crock of shit that it would have to be entirely rewritten before it would represent reality in any serious way. No one with a brain is going to be fooled by this, it may be just massaging the ego of believers, giving more pseudo-scientific reasons to try and rationalize their belief. But since I don't know anything much about it, I could be way off :p RE: Newer Quran Translations
February 25, 2015 at 5:30 am
(This post was last modified: February 25, 2015 at 5:35 am by robvalue.)
It won't be long before they'll start inserting the words "didn't" and "wasn't" to try and reverse the meanings of sentences. Not that religious people have any problem doing that themselves!
Eventually the bible and quran are going to end up like these books: If you believe in evolution, go to verse 34. Otherwise, go to verse 2. If you think god likes slavery, go to verse 98. If you think he finds it objectionable, go to verse 102.
Sounds like some rewrites to me. Pretty soon we'll see "Mohammed didn't punch the moon in half, but it'd be cool if he did!"
I can't remember where this verse is from, I think it got removed from canon:
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay." For context, this is the previous verse: "Hi Jesus" -robvalue RE: Newer Quran Translations
February 25, 2015 at 5:42 am
(This post was last modified: February 25, 2015 at 5:43 am by robvalue.)
Actually, the word "metaphorically" might start making frequent appearances.
The problem with them trying to pull this kind of stunt is that we're in the internet age, and people are going to see very quickly that the perfect word of god has been altered. You can't just get away with it like you could when it was written on the back of fag packets or whatever.
(February 25, 2015 at 5:42 am)robvalue Wrote: The problem with them trying to pull this kind of stunt is that we're in the internet age, and people are going to see very quickly that the perfect word of god has been altered. You can't just get away with it like you could when it was written on the back of fag packets or whatever. The internet is where religions come to die.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)




