Supreme Court Same Sex Marriage Argumet

[Foxaèr]

Another link, in case that one above did not suffice:

http://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com...ex_couples

[robvalue]

Fuck that stupid cunt of a judge.

You're "judging" skills are not required when performing marriages. If you can't do your damn job without whining like a bitch about your religious bigotry, then have the guts to quit.

[Ace]

There are some new rules for this thread. Every time someone makes a homophobic "argument", they get 5 flat-pack points. Once they get to 100, they combine them to make a closet.

HAHAHAHAH   HAHAHAHA

Wow!!!  you fucking joking? really???  


What are we 2? Hey if you don't want to act like an adult, that is up to you, but those who do want to, this is a fucking public discussion forum!!!! grow some balls and stop crying.  

Just because you don't like an augment or statement made by member????!!!! Come on, this "new rule" But would  actually close every thread  because there are disagreements and disputes in all of them. Because  that is what a discussion is. If we we just always say I agree than that is not a discussion from but a circle  jerk-off form  

So the only thing that can not be talked about in a "displeasing or hateful"  manner is  Homosexuality?

WOW !!!

We can say personal insults and say hateful and discriminatory things about religion, (which is actually discrimination speech, Religion is a protected class in both  the U.S. Law and in International Law. Homosexuality is not a protected class in either one International Law

UMM How is that equality? How is that not discrimination or hate speech!!!???

So what happens if I have two bodies of law on my side? Given that the county were I am this is not illegal as well as international law. So I have two but France's Law (one) can override my two?

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-orientated or any other material that may violate any laws be it of your country, the country where “Atheist Forums” is hosted (France) or International Law.
So what happens if I have two bodies of law on my side? The U.S and international law. Does France's Law (one) override my two?


Is this your personal statement or accrual rules?

If actual rule, who made this rule and when?
What if the  thread that was made to discuss homophobic topic or homosexuality?

How does this not violate the site's other rules? Because this "new rule" is in contortionist to other site rule's

We believe in [i]freedom of speech / expression, which means you can discuss your ideas without fear of censorship or limitation, provided you are not breaking the rules & guidelines below.

General Forum Rules: Disrupting Forum Activity
Trying to disrupt or disable forum activity, through any means possible (e.g. blanking posts, attempting hacks, threatening members), is strictly forbidden. This activity will very quickly attract the attention of the forum staff and will almost certainly result in a warning and possibly a ban.

Also, what a thread was made before the "New rule" were put into place? Do they fall under the grandfather clauses or ex po facto,( which is the law in the U.S., International Law and Frances) which make the "new Rules" obsolete to the old and is only active to new threads that have been made after the passing of new rule?

Also how is this considered LEGAL if it actual violates my country law in regarding free speech in a public form

The standard legal stuff...

The IP addresses of all posts are recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions.


HAHAHA ok so this public forum is also taking on the rules of the NAS, CIA, and FBI . . . .? recording and keeping citizens privet activity on the inter net for the  "national security . HAHAH  
"The IP addresses of all posts are recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions."

I would have never thought of Frances to ever be in support of such Gestapo Laws

  Oh Atheist's, You So Disappoint

[Redbeard The Pink]

He's calling you guys closeted gays, Ace. What are you, brain-dead?

[Ace]

I have to say yes because I did not get the joke/ statement . If that is what it really is and not actually an informed post of the change of the form rules.


But how is that an "insult" if begging gay is good!!!!??

[Redbeard The Pink]

I have to say yes because I did not get the joke/ statement . If that is what it really is and not actually an informed post of the change of the form rules.


But how is that an "insult" if begging gay is good!!!!??

If you think being gay is good, then it isn't an insult.

[Ace]

I would think they would let him recuse himself from performing any marriages.  It is a good thing this is just an advisory opinion and not binding..

You are a fucking idiot.

http://patriotpost.us/posts/36931

The Ohio judge "must" perform the marriages.

Fuck you.

Hmm that is very interesting because the recusing of a judge is to remove him and place someone who will judge with out basi or persional intent. I wonder how that works with judicial process? Because that is a right that all judges have.

Hmmm?

[Ace]

I have to say yes because I did not get the joke/ statement . If that is what it really is and not actually an informed post of the change of the form rules.


But how is that an "insult" if begging gay is good!!!!??

If you think being gay is good, then it isn't an insult.

If I think,? Hell the western world thinks it so it does not matter what I think. It is western ideology.
Also, question if you are gay support gayness then how is calling someone gay (in a derogatory form) not insulting to you who is gay and to those you support? Because in essences you are using gay as bad word in the statement. I am seeing that a lot on this form.
Just wondered about that.

[Homeless Nutter]

[...]it so it does not matter what I think.[...]

There you go. I knew you'd finally get there, sport. Now - please - could you pass this on to as many of your angry closet-buddies as you can?

[robvalue]

Yes, it was a humorous way of implying that anyone who spends this much time agonising over what gays do to each other is very likely actually gay/bisexual themself. Being prepared to nuke the entire gay community rather than simply come out is a bit extreme.

And no, it's not an insult, it's an observation based on experience.

The second most likely thing going on here is that you've both been "educated" by the same/similar people, who have indoctrinated you heavily with vicious lies/slurs about homosexuals.

I have no power to change forum rules, nor would I want to.