RE: Interview with a Jovo
June 12, 2015 at 9:33 am
(This post was last modified: June 12, 2015 at 9:34 am by Drich.)
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 2, 2026, 3:21 pm
Thread Rating:
|
Interview with a Jovo
|
|
Your continous misrepresentation of this situation is absolutely infuriating. You really are that dense.
Read the bolded part of your own post very carefully, Dripsy. Quote:The law requires an employer or other covered entity to reasonably accommodate an employee's religious beliefs or practices, unless doing so would cause more than a minimal burden on the operations of the employer's business . And now, read this part of the OP, paying extra special attention to the bolded sentence: (June 10, 2015 at 3:40 am)Pandæmonium Wrote: We got down to the details of the role, which included every month working a Saturday or a Sunday with a day off in the week or time in lieu. She flat out refused to work the Sunday citing her religious observance as the reason why: "I have to observe my religion which I'm very passionate about, so I cannot work Sunday's under any circumstances." Case. Dismissed. (June 12, 2015 at 9:40 am)Neimenovic Wrote: Your continous misrepresentation of this situation is absolutely infuriating. You really are that dense. Keep reading monkey man.. The paragraph includes examples. Those examples specifically dictate that scheduling days off to conside with religious beliefs is indeed to be considered to be a " a minimal burden on the operations of the employer's business." In this case the government sets the standard on what is and is not to be a minimal burden, not the OP or you! This law specifically allows (in this case) the right for a cleaning lady to have a sunday off to goto Church. Why? Because again to do so according to the goverment does indeed fall into the term "minimal burden" to make such an allowance. (June 12, 2015 at 9:46 am)Drich Wrote:(June 11, 2015 at 9:15 am)Neimenovic Wrote: How many times do you need to hear it? You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid. Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis. RE: Interview with a Jovo
June 12, 2015 at 11:52 am
(This post was last modified: June 12, 2015 at 11:52 am by KevinM1.)
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
RE: Interview with a Jovo
June 12, 2015 at 11:52 am
(This post was last modified: June 12, 2015 at 11:56 am by Longhorn.)
(June 12, 2015 at 9:53 am)Drich Wrote: Keep reading monkey man.. The paragraph includes examples. Those examples specifically dictate that scheduling days off to conside with religious beliefs is indeed to be considered to be a " a minimal burden on the operations of the employer's business." Um, no. The paragraph does mention flexible scheduling. To be exact, it states: Quote:This means an employer may be required to make reasonable adjustments to the work environment that will allow an employee to practice his or her religion. The keywords being 'may' and 'reasonable'. I underlined them for you. Then it goes on to list examples of religious accommodations commonly made by employers. It does not specifically state that a cleaning lady has to have a Sunday off, that would be ridiculous. As mentioned in the OP, it's essential that the cleaners work in the agreed working hours, otherwise it would put a strain on the manager. And you are STILL missing two aspects of the case, namely that the job description clearly stated the working hours and that the woman applied with that knowledge in mind and also the fact that other religious employees were denied a day off for the very same reason. There is no prejudice or discrimination here, it's the exact opposite. RE: Interview with a Jovo
June 12, 2015 at 12:01 pm
(This post was last modified: June 12, 2015 at 12:04 pm by Nope.)
Drich, I asked how you would feel about hiring a teacher whose religious beliefs include wearing a phallic symbol around their neck. If Christians get special privileges because of religion than all religions get those same privileges.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads… | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| [Serious] Interview Assignment | Student | 70 | 18285 |
November 21, 2019 at 12:00 pm Last Post: Mister Agenda |
|
| Pope says in interview that there is no hell. | downbeatplumb | 56 | 20849 |
April 16, 2018 at 8:53 pm Last Post: Jehanne |
|
| Atheist Interview! All knowledgeable Atheists needed! | danidare13 | 19 | 7201 |
September 25, 2013 at 11:25 am Last Post: Jackalope |
|
| Interview | Drich | 93 | 39441 |
October 31, 2012 at 2:14 pm Last Post: Tnmusicman |
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



