Now what?

[Cyberman]

No no no, Drich owns a pair of those sunglasses from They Live which let him see all the conformist propaganda on all the billboards and TV screens. He knows too much and must be 'disappeared'.

[Cato]

Do you think the supremecourt decision would have been null and void if they used the term 'civial union' over marriage?

I understand that it's difficult for you, but please try to keep up. Had legislatures influenced by the religious right permitted civil unions that provided the same legal benefits of marriage, there would have been no basis for a 14th amendment equal protection case. The fact is that many did not and the result was last week's decision. Screaming for civil unions now is laughable; kind of like treating decapitation with a bandage.

Citation?
I couldn't find anything.. matter of fact I found that there is a 600 yearold example of gay civial unions which the church did not cosponsor.

Are you seriously making an attempt to disavow the religious right's influence in the Ohio style legislation prohibiting civil unions?

What are you talking about? I wasn't till the last 20 years that supposed Christians have not taken marriage seriously.

Even then we still fair better than most.

Bullshit:

Actually I did infact research everything I say as well as what you say sport, and can not find anything to support anything you said here off your cuff. Maybe regoup and try again. This time take the time to check the crap you try and sell with google first. Because I will, and force feed it back to you if it does not fly.

Looks like your research skills require an upgrade.

[Cato]

Didn't you know the separation of Church and state only work one way in this hypocritical society. The Church is not aloowed to infringe on the state, but the state is allowed to mandate rules to the church.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014...rry-gays-/

The couple are not operating a fucking church you imbecile:

The dictate comes on the heels of a legal battle with Donald and Evelyn Knapp, ordained ministers who own the Hitching Post wedding chapel in the city, but who oppose gay marriage, The Daily Caller reported.

As ministers they can refuse to marry homosexuals in a church until Christ returns, but as business owners they cannot. American Jesus probably doesn't have an issue with turning a profit with his dad's sacred covenant, but traditional Jesus probably wouldn't be too pleased. Tell me again how important marriage is to Christians when they will marry off anyone, excluding gays of course, wielding a marriage license.

[tokutter]

What are you talking about? I wasn't till the last 20 years that supposed Christians have not taken marriage seriously.
Even then we still fair better than most.

Yep ............more christians........out there ..........making up their own rules.............just...... WINGING IT



PRESENT COMPANY EXCLUDED OF COURSE

[Pyrrho]

So, what's left? Slavery is done for, we have civil rights on paper at least, we kicked God out of schools, and now we have marriage equality. But I keep hearing that this latest move is a step or a sign that "they're taking away our religious freedoms". But is there anything left to change for the betterment of America that was put in place for religious reasons?

I would be tempted to say taxing churches, but I wouldn't want to lose separation of church and state.

There is a whole new level of debauchery in which we as a society can move into. I think giving our young children the right to choose their gender is one. (allowing them to choose to be a boy or a girl even before they know what it fully means.) that seems to be topping the news lately.

Under age sex. We keep pushing the sexualization of children in this country. Movies, magazines etc...

Normalizing incest would be another direction society will go before too long.. as it is in our movies and is being pushing into our homes via popular TV shows. (right now for shock value, but before too long it will be the new 'normal.')

then you also have to strip the church of it place in the community, after all you have already blurred the lines between church and state when the state determines who can be apart of one of our most sacred covenants. (marriage)

Then force everyone to take a mark on their hand or forehead and we will be all set for the final judgement!

So you are wanting to promote Biblical marriage?  Here is Biblical marriage explained:

[The Valkyrie]

Tax churches that deliberately violate the rules of not endorsing political candidates or parties.

Three step rule.

1st time: They're fined
2nd time: Heavier fine
3rd time:  Lose tax free status

Anyway, weren't you at the meeting?  Next is micro-chipping all believers, banning religion, and then Fema death camps.

[Exian]

Ah, missed the damn meeting. Happy to hear the micro-chip plan is a go. We're sure to win this years War on Christmas.

[The Valkyrie]

Ah, missed the damn meeting. Happy to hear the micro-chip plan is a go. We're sure to win this years War on Christmas.

Yeah, this year we're getting aircraft . . . and tanks.

[Randy Carson]

Tax churches that deliberately violate the rules of not endorsing political candidates or parties.

Three step rule.

1st time: They're fined
2nd time: Heavier fine
3rd time:  Lose tax free status

Anyway, weren't you at the meeting?  Next is micro-chipping all believers, banning religion, and then Fema death camps.

Unlikely.

We'll be losing tax-exempt status within the next decade, IMO. And that will be the least of our worries.

[The Valkyrie]

Just think of it this way. Even if the "persecution" Christians claim is happening to them now actually happens, it can't be any worse than the Christians have done to others for hundreds of years.