Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 19, 2024, 6:37 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Richard Dawkins and the God of the Old Testament
#21
RE: Richard Dawkins and the God of the Old Testament
(September 27, 2015 at 12:05 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Shooting the messenger, right?  Quite possibly ad hominem as well.  What do I win??

Boru

A moment to reconsider whether dismissing an argument because of its source is an intelligent thing to do.
Reply
#22
RE: Richard Dawkins and the God of the Old Testament
(September 27, 2015 at 12:06 pm)abaris Wrote:
(September 27, 2015 at 12:03 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: Is there any chance you might actually interact with the argument instead of dismissing it because of who wrote it?

Unlikely.

No, because the source is the message. What makes a catholic ehticist more credible than an atheist? That's what you fail to get. Bias on both sides of the issue.

Just deal with the argument at hand.
Reply
#23
RE: Richard Dawkins and the God of the Old Testament
(September 27, 2015 at 12:06 pm)Aoi Magi Wrote: Atheism is NOT a worldview or anything like that, it doesn't dictate morality or almost anything we do in our daily lives. Why is it so hard to understand?

Because strawmen fall down easier than reality. And it's the victory that counts; however facile. Gotta rack up those brownie points!
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
#24
RE: Richard Dawkins and the God of the Old Testament
(September 27, 2015 at 12:06 pm)Aoi Magi Wrote: Atheism is NOT a worldview or anything like that, it doesn't dictate morality or almost anything we do in our daily lives. Why is it so hard to understand?

Because atheism is a worldview.
Reply
#25
RE: Richard Dawkins and the God of the Old Testament
(September 27, 2015 at 11:09 am)Randy Carson Wrote: Wiker notes that in coming over to the atheist side, we face a number of new problems that arise.

Quote:First of all, as he himself admits in his book River out of Eden, in coming over to Dawkins' side, we have thereby embraced a cosmos indifferent to good or evil. As a consequence, we immediately face a dilemma: we have no moral grounds for condemning the actions of God (He doesn't exist) or the characters in the Bible (good and evil don't exist). Since God doesn't exist, there is no reason to work up a froth of indignation against Him, anymore than against the lunkheaded Zeus in Homer's Iliad.
[snip]

Atheism doesn't equate to moral anti-realism. Your 'ethicist' has erected a moral straw man. Total fail.
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
#26
RE: Richard Dawkins and the God of the Old Testament
3rd times the charm!

(September 27, 2015 at 11:50 am)Bad Wolf Wrote: Randy, answer me this: would it hurt if for no reason, I approached you with a cleaver and cut off your hand?
'The more I learn about people the more I like my dog'- Mark Twain

'You can have all the faith you want in spirits, and the afterlife, and heaven and hell, but when it comes to this world, don't be an idiot. Cause you can tell me you put your faith in God to put you through the day, but when it comes time to cross the road, I know you look both ways.' - Dr House

“Young earth creationism is essentially the position that all of modern science, 90% of living scientists and 98% of living biologists, all major university biology departments, every major science journal, the American Academy of Sciences, and every major science organization in the world, are all wrong regarding the origins and development of life….but one particular tribe of uneducated, bronze aged, goat herders got it exactly right.” - Chuck Easttom

"If my good friend Doctor Gasparri speaks badly of my mother, he can expect to get punched.....You cannot provoke. You cannot insult the faith of others. You cannot make fun of the faith of others. There is a limit." - Pope Francis on freedom of speech
Reply
#27
RE: Richard Dawkins and the God of the Old Testament
(September 27, 2015 at 12:12 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: A moment to reconsider whether dismissing an argument because of its source is an intelligent thing to do.

No, no, no. Dismissing an argument is something totally different from being skeptical of an argument. The source is dubious by any scientifics standards. Both authors have an agenda. So, if you were really out for a serious discussion, both arguments would have to be evaluated according to source criticism. Which is really something you can't do in an opinonated thread.

That's what you constantly fail to understand. Your champions aren't right because they happen to confirm your opinion. They aren't wrong by default either. But it needs a lot more than just copy pasting a piece to make a case. And I guess, even you wouldn't go by the same standards if it was about a Marxist making a claim.
[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]
Reply
#28
RE: Richard Dawkins and the God of the Old Testament
20 replies in the first hour.

Only one half-ass hearted attempt to respond to the argument.

You guys really aren't as good at this as you think you are...

[Image: dts.gif]
Reply
#29
RE: Richard Dawkins and the God of the Old Testament
(September 27, 2015 at 12:12 pm)Randy Carson Wrote:
(September 27, 2015 at 12:05 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Shooting the messenger, right?  Quite possibly ad hominem as well.  What do I win??

Boru

A moment to reconsider whether dismissing an argument because of its source is an intelligent thing to do.

*chuckle* Gotcher. I didn't commit any logical fallacy, since Wiker's motives (given his publication history, his background, and the fact that he works for The Discovery Institute) are a priori inimical to Dawkins' position. Ad hominem is not always a fallacy. This is one of those cases.

Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#30
RE: Richard Dawkins and the God of the Old Testament
(September 27, 2015 at 12:13 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: Just deal with the argument at hand.

No, read my latest reply.
[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Darth Dawkins having "rare" moments of weakness GrandizerII 5 1412 February 9, 2022 at 4:30 pm
Last Post: Simon Moon
  Did Jesus call the Old Testament God the Devil, a Murderer and the Father of Lies? dude1 51 8458 November 6, 2018 at 12:46 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Old Testament Prophecy Proof of Jesus Nihilist Virus 45 6279 August 12, 2016 at 12:50 pm
Last Post: Nihilist Virus
  The Immorality of God - Slavery in the Old Testament athrock 307 35828 January 31, 2016 at 5:03 pm
Last Post: Aegon
  The Historical Reliability of the New Testament Randy Carson 706 108145 June 9, 2015 at 12:04 pm
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  The Utter Irrelevance of the New Testament Whateverist 66 10419 May 24, 2015 at 6:59 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  The Question of the Greek New Testament Rhondazvous 130 22465 May 19, 2015 at 8:13 am
Last Post: Aractus
  New Testament arguments urlawyer 185 21940 March 24, 2015 at 5:26 pm
Last Post: The Reality Salesman01
  Richard Carrier - The Romulus/Jesus Myth Connection Minimalist 0 4842 November 8, 2014 at 1:00 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Jews and the old testament Vivalarevolution 40 6876 October 21, 2014 at 5:55 am
Last Post: Vivalarevolution



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)