As the Dover trial so richly showed, there is no science in creationism. Forced to admit under oath even...
So, science in creationism? Please....
So, science in creationism? Please....
|
Creation Muesum
|
|
As the Dover trial so richly showed, there is no science in creationism. Forced to admit under oath even...
So, science in creationism? Please.... (October 26, 2015 at 10:03 pm)JesusHChrist Wrote: As the Dover trial so richly showed, there is no science in creationism. Forced to admit under oath even... I've been asking for 20 pages now... (October 26, 2015 at 8:24 pm)robvalue Wrote: If god had just made exactly how many people he had wanted in the first place, and didn't make them die, then there would have been no need for reproduction at all. He Did. If you notice, He made man (all of mankind) in his image (spirit) on the 6th day, also man was BOTH male AND female. Quote:Genesis 1 God rested on the 7th day, THEN he created a body for Adam (1000 years AFTER he originally created mankind), the body created after the manner in which he made the beasts. Keep in mind Adam was both male and female. The feminine part of Adam was removed to create Eve. Quote:Genesis 2 What does this mean? It means that you didn't begin to exist when you were born, you've existed way back before Adam was put on the earth. (October 26, 2015 at 6:20 pm)Mermaid Wrote: God never intended for us to reproduce sexually? Like I said earlier, Adam was both male AND female, and was around long before Eve showed up, sooooo.... Also our body is made in the image the of beasts, but whats inside the body is in the image of God, and will return to God upon leaving the body. Quote:2 Corinthians 5:1
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>(October 27, 2015 at 12:22 am)Huggy74 Wrote:(October 26, 2015 at 11:57 pm)Redbeard The Pink Wrote: Huggy, that is some far-fetched shit, son. Your gender-bent Adam is a far-fetched twist on the Genesis story in the same way that The Ten Commandments (the 1956 movie) is a far-fetched twist on the Exodus story. RE: Creation Muesum
October 27, 2015 at 3:55 am
(This post was last modified: October 27, 2015 at 3:56 am by robvalue.)
Creationist science amounts to retrofitting known information (found out by actual science) to primitive texts. That's the reverse of science.
The parts which are convenient, that is. Ignorant propaganda declares the inconvenient parts to be some sort of conspiracy.
This is why it's so important to teach actual science in schools and not creation.
If The Flintstones have taught us anything, it's that pelicans can be used to mix cement.
-Homer Simpson (October 26, 2015 at 8:54 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: Not a priori. Show me some of this science. I'll let it stand on its own merits. I have asked politely for some of this creationist science multiple times, but you are loath to produce it. I suppose what I have been trying to get to; and will just come out and ask is what is your definition of science? What are the minimum requirements that are needed to be in your view science? I would like to nail down the goal posts, before we proceed. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|