|
Conversational Challenges
|
 RE: Conversational Challenges
November 14, 2015 at 11:10 am
(This post was last modified: November 14, 2015 at 11:11 am by Fidel_Castronaut.)
OP, if you want to read some wacky arguments and get a lobotomy on the cheap you'd be best off reading the arguments from the poster 'little rik' (above). That's some nut fuckery you're unlikely to encounter in meat space.
 (November 14, 2015 at 4:56 am)Oceanian Wrote:(November 13, 2015 at 8:05 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: No doubt, the sincerity of the OP is questionable at best. Sorry about that. Didn't mean to get all personal and mean on you. It just fits a pattern for theists to come here and be leaning toward atheism except for ..  (November 14, 2015 at 11:10 am)Pandæmonium Wrote: OP, if you want to read some wacky arguments and get a lobotomy on the cheap you'd be best off reading the arguments from the poster 'little rik' (above). That's some nut fuckery you're unlikely to encounter in meat space. And there's enough of it to keep you entertained for years... Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists. Index of useful threads and discussions Index of my best videos Quickstart guide to the forum 
Also, do try the lasagne!
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear. 
I just stumbled across my youtube comments' replies, and found THE stereotypical close-minded christian yet again.
Comments goes as follows: User 'Ekto Snot' +Yu Xi Tao (that's me) My friend, your assumption was already talked and studied. And guess what? He existed! Before bullshiting, learn! Bullshit, we can all talk. ------------------------------------------------------- My reply: User 'Yu Xi Tao' What the actual fuck? You are trying to convince me a invisible male/female in the sky exists by saying he does? What kind of argument is that? You know what, you're not worth reasoning... --------------------------------------------------------- What he meant by assumption was the evolution theory. You know, his comment actually made me laugh. Anyways, I didn't really think it would be worth reasoning.
"The belief that everything came from a invisible man, was rational enough in the prehistoric era.
This belief in the modern world however, is hallucination and cannot be explained otherwise." -Oceanian  (November 14, 2015 at 7:29 am)Little Rik Wrote:(November 12, 2015 at 12:26 pm)robvalue Wrote: Heya, welcome to the forum Who let this guy loose? Quick, grab the chain! 
I actually enjoyed Dawkins and TGD
 . It was my first time reading on the subject of atheism. I really liked his concept of the crane versus the skyhook when talking about natural selection and creationism. But I am relatively new to atheism, and far from a great intellect, the likes of which I see all the time on these forums, so what the hell do I know? ?
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken. 
I also enjoyed TGD very much, one of my favourite books ever. Oh, BTW though, he borrowed the crane and skyhook analogy from Daniel Dennett.
Conversational Challenges
December 8, 2015 at 1:24 pm
(This post was last modified: December 8, 2015 at 1:25 pm by LadyForCamus.)
Oh my! Thank you for the clarification
Also, I definitely posted that comment on the wrong thread...lol
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
![[Image: 146748944129044_zpsomrzyn3d.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i629.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fuu13%2FRXM843%2F146748944129044_zpsomrzyn3d.gif)
