(December 9, 2015 at 6:57 am)paulpablo Wrote:You must not have read the articles. All ideas start with one person and then it spreads. The Jewish commies and socialists came up with the idea of politcal correctness as a method to destabilize the Western nations. They did not do it for the good of humanity.(December 9, 2015 at 4:40 am)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote: Political correctness was the brainchild of the Italian socialist Antonio Gramsci and Jewish commie Georg Lukacs who wanted to overthrow the western nations and turn them into commie land. They cooked up their plot after WWI. The Jews attempt to turn Germany into commie land made them enemies of the German nation.
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/2...rrectness/
http://www.academia.org/the-origins-of-p...rrectness/
Political correctness isn't an invention made by any specific country, it's simply people taking measures to not offend or disadvantage any group. It can get ridiculous because people can be offended by anything and people are often naturally disadvantaged in comarison to one another.
I think the whole thing is too complex to say would I rather go with or without it.
I don't understand political correctness when it comes to individual words being used. And I think religions can cause people to be offended irrationally by things in a very stubborn way.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 11, 2025, 11:36 am
Thread Rating:
Political Correctness
|
(December 9, 2015 at 1:10 pm)paulpablo Wrote:Did you know that "Negro" is the only race mentioned in the original US Constitution?(December 9, 2015 at 11:30 am)bennyboy Wrote: Yeah, it is. These words serve to dehumanize. And once someone is seen is sub-human, then they are outside the umbrella of protection of "civilized" fold-- you know, good guys. Like. . . white and stuff.In those situations it isn't the word that dehumanises them, the word is interchangeable to the dehumanisation.
Has anyone talked about midgets yet? I found one that I want.
(December 9, 2015 at 9:03 pm)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote:(December 9, 2015 at 1:10 pm)paulpablo Wrote: In those situations it isn't the word that dehumanises them, the word is interchangeable to the dehumanisation.Did you know that "Negro" is the only race mentioned in the original US Constitution? Was that in reference to antique farm equipment? RE: Political Correctness
December 9, 2015 at 9:17 pm
(This post was last modified: December 9, 2015 at 9:20 pm by Cinjin.)
Regarding OP:
To decide whether or not PC is an appropriately functioning mechanism in our society one must look a the definitions of the words 'politically correct.' Most definitions of the word 'political' will define the word as: of or relating to governing, and/or the concerns of a political party. 'Correct', obviously means true and without fault ... or does it? The word correct has another meaning: to scold, rebuke, or to point out the errors. This means political correctness is a product of some ruling body's arbitrary censorship. What is the dominant group where you live? If you live in a Hispanic community you will be rebuked (corrected) for verbiage that they find offensive, and so on with any other race, creed, or sexual lifestyle of any group. I believe this is why political correctness is such a problem. It opens a door to abuse and it stifles open communication between opposing groups. It's essentially governing censorship and any dominant group can be the "governing power". Attempting to be considerate of others feelings and sensitivities is simply polite. It has nothing to do with whether or not you have been politically correct. The biggest racist asshole in the world can hold his tongue. Being "all PC" is lip service ... it means nothing, and in truth I think the more people feel they HAVE TO be politically correct the more it breeds contempt for the group that has set themselves up to be above the opinions of others. One will find it difficult to grow and improve if he will not even consider the opinions of others about who they are. You can always discard the angry irrational rantings of a bigot, but to simply protect yourself under the flag of political correctness has turned into a quagmire of PC bull shit here in the US. Maybe in Europe too? Whatever your opinion, I think common sense and politeness should be enough. This business of "you better not say that here" has just become about unbearable these days.
I don't use the term PC, since human decency works just as well in my mind.
I've also noticed that many folks who have a tendency to rail against the suggestion of anything being considered offensive, are often quite easily offended themselves. Of course, when they find something to be insulting or offensive, it's with good and very legitimate reason; usually because they're involved. (December 9, 2015 at 8:08 pm)Clueless Morgan Wrote:(December 9, 2015 at 7:35 pm)bennyboy Wrote: How about using negative words like "retarded?" I'm perfectly comfortable using this word when I think someone/something is stupid, exactly because a retarded person is stupid. But then I have to listen to the outrage from my aunts, and how her special-needs students are "differently abled" and all that. Fine, let them help my daughter with her calculus homework, then. I don't like it when the simple reality of the human condition, and the words about it, take a backseat to a kind of condescending "support." When you criticize someone, you criticize them for something that, in your eyes, is dysfunctional. With respect to at least one person in this thread, if a driver bumped into my car in the parking lot, I'd likely ask, "Dude, are you blind?" That means neither that I really think the person is blind, nor that I have a general disrespect for people who really can't see well. But the analogy is clear enough, and fair enough. It is true that retarded people don't think as well as others. When a normal person acts in a way in which they aren't processing ideas as they should, then I am likely to ask "Dude, are you retarded?" Again, that means neither that I really think the person is retarded, nor that I have a general disrespect for people who really can't think well. But the analogy is clear enough, and fair enough, in my opinion. (December 9, 2015 at 1:08 pm)Clueless Morgan Wrote:You know what God said about holidays? "Fuck your holidays and festivals."(December 9, 2015 at 12:25 pm)Kingpin Wrote: PC debates always arise this time of year, because people get "offended" by words like "Christmas" or manger scenes in yards. It's a little ironic because PC is meant to be speech to make all feel inclusive, but in reality it's rephrasing to exclude that which people find offensive and in turn offending others. It's a not a "holiday" tree lighting ceremony. it's a Christmas tree lighting ceremony. It's not a holiday menora, it's a Hanukkah Menora. Call it what it is. Isaiah 1:13-14 (CEV) = "13 Your sacrifices are worthless, and incense is disgusting. I can’t stand the evil you do on your New Moon Festivals or on your Sabbaths and other times of worship. 14 I hate your New Moon Festivals and all others as well. They are a heavy burden I am tired of carrying." RE: Political Correctness
December 13, 2015 at 5:23 pm
(This post was last modified: December 13, 2015 at 5:45 pm by Regina.)
It can go too far. I get tired of when little trivial things, or even humour, are taken out of context and people get offended at it. Sometimes, humour is genuinely funny way to approach taboo topics.
I also get sick of seeing straight white liberals "getting offended" on other peoples' bahalves, and not being sincere about it. For example, if you want to speak out and show your support for LGBT people, I really appreciate that. What I don't need is you telling me when to be offended. I have the right to see homophobia in a particular instance or to not see homophobia, I don't need to be told "this is offensive and you should be outraged". I can decide that for myself. Another thing is that selective outrage I'm always calling out. If you're going to be PC, at least be fucking consistent with it. I'm tired of seeing the liberals go off on someone who is in a relatively "privileged" position in society for something, and then turn a blind eye when someone who is in some way a minority does the exact same thing. Shit like this pisses me off; I'm not saying anything here is right or wrong. I'm just saying, if you want to be a PC brigade member who wants to sensor everything in society, you have to have that standard for everyone, not just for straight white Christians. You can either not take offense at anything, or take offense to everything. There's no one standard for one group of people and then a completely different standard for everyone else. Misogyny is misogyny whether it's coming out the mouth of a straight or a gay man, and anti-semitism is still anti-semitism when it's coming from a Muslim.
"Adulthood is like looking both ways before you cross the road, and then getting hit by an airplane" - sarcasm_only
"Ironically like the nativist far-Right, which despises multiculturalism, but benefits from its ideas of difference to scapegoat the other and to promote its own white identity politics; these postmodernists, leftists, feminists and liberals also use multiculturalism, to side with the oppressor, by demanding respect and tolerance for oppression characterised as 'difference', no matter how intolerable." - Maryam Namazie (December 8, 2015 at 8:13 pm)abaris Wrote:(December 8, 2015 at 8:04 pm)Shining_Finger Wrote: Would you rather live in a world where evolution made a different turn, not creating political correctness a function of the brain? Or would you rather continue to live in this world? Why for either? Let's put the blame back where it belongs shall we? Political correctness is the brainchild of the so-called Frankfort school, leftist European intellectuals working in the US. Because the workers' revolution never happened they prompted 'critical' theory to undermine capitalism. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
Political Compass test | Regina | 18 | 5424 |
March 18, 2015 at 5:27 pm Last Post: KevinM1 |
|
What political philosophy is best | cratehorus | 48 | 18516 |
August 6, 2012 at 3:36 am Last Post: Darth |
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)