Give Constructive Criticism To The User Above You

[Edwardo Piet]

The purpose of this thread is indeed to give constructive criticism to the forum user/member/poster above you.

It has to be constructive, no flaming insulting or otherwise breaking the forums' rules of course. The whole idea is to give some constructive criticism.

Note: It can be either serious or a joke, but try to not make it nasty or hostile.

(Hopefully this could possibly even get some of the more angry members into the habit of being more constructively critical. It's a longshot but a bonus hope of mine).


EDITED: I fucked up and put this as "below you" instead of "above you", as StarCraft noted.

[SteelCurtain]

This is a good thread, but it might have worked better if you had made it about the poster above you, as we'd have an object for our constructive criticism. He says, to whomever posts next.

[Excited Penguin]

Great observation, except he obviously did that on purpose to get things going. The two of you probably even conspired together to get us to post in this thread.

[Edwardo Piet]

Oh fuck I MEANT above. LOL I'm correcting it, ignore this post

EDIT: Ok done.

My constructive criticism to you EP is: Try to not spread rumors of conspiracy unless you have evidence. Unless you're just joking, in that case it's absolutely fine!

[c172]

Could you maybe consider a name change? I keep thinking you're a girl, but posters keep acting like you're a guy.

(totes kidding, btw)

[Edwardo Piet]

My constructive criticism is that I'd recommend you not advise me on changing my most turtleyest name.

(I also totes kidding).

[Longhorn]

I would recommend using words that actually exist....But it's optional

[Excited Penguin]

Is it against the rules to say that this sucks? If it is, it blows.

[Alex K]

[I'm kinda disappointed that it was changed to "above" though...]

[Edwardo Piet]

I would advise not skipping EP because now I can't address him because you're above me.