(March 24, 2016 at 9:41 am)vorlon13 Wrote: The Mormon hierarchy comes right out and says with their revelations and pronouncements, the thinking has ALREADY BEEN DONE. Clearly, the pew warmers and check writers are not encouraged to ask questions or spend any time considering the folderol and balderdash the LDS poobahs regurgitate all over them.Religious bigwigs don't like it when people question their favorite religious fairy tales. Some will even kill the person who dares ask the questions.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 7, 2025, 6:28 pm
Thread Rating:
A problem with how theists think.
|
At your local LDS franchise, you get to talk to the elders, and if you don't adjust your attitude, you'll be shown the door.
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
(March 23, 2016 at 1:25 pm)RozKek Wrote: I have heard and seen many theists ask "How did the universe come into existence? Where did the first cell/matter come from? Where did the Big Bang come from? etc" something along those lines. (Although that is a really weak argument and isn't evidence at all.) I am curious about your "if you think about it" statement here.... could you please expound on this more, and why you are questioning "how logical is it". (March 24, 2016 at 9:41 am)vorlon13 Wrote: The Mormon hierarchy comes right out and says with their revelations and pronouncements, the thinking has ALREADY BEEN DONE. Clearly, the pew warmers and check writers are not encouraged to ask questions or spend any time considering the folderol and balderdash the LDS poobahs regurgitate all over them. Not ENCOURAGED to ask questions? Vorlon, I have been in fundie churches where questioning was plainly said to be a mortal sin. I once got up the guts to ask my Mother why this one Bible passage disagreed with this other one, telling the same story. How did she know which one was right? She dragged me to the preacher, who told me emphatically that both were right, and they had me stay for -- I dunno, seemed like hours -- on my knees in the front of the church praying for the faith to trust that god was perfect and would explain everything when I got to heaven. Dozens of people kept coming in and praying with me ("Oh, Lord, let your spirit descend upon this confused little girl") and laying their hands on my back and shoulders. I didn't like it. Xtians ask for answers to questions that science can't answer, because they think the question has already been answered. God told 'em god didit. They're actually honestly confused when the poor atheist doesn't believe that.
"The family that prays together...is brainwashing their children."- Albert Einstein
RE: A problem with how theists think.
March 25, 2016 at 11:34 am
(This post was last modified: March 25, 2016 at 11:38 am by The Grand Nudger.)
Road, if all that you see here, around you...everything in this world, positively screams out for an explanation, for cause. So too, would a god. If a person was consistently applying whatever thought process led them to the former, the latter is inescapable. If, in the latter, one feels that no further explanation, no further cause, is necessary, then again, a person applying whatever thought process led them to that conclusion, consistently, would see no such requirement for the former.
Either the same thought process works in both cases, or it doesn't work at all.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
(March 25, 2016 at 11:29 am)drfuzzy Wrote:(March 24, 2016 at 9:41 am)vorlon13 Wrote: The Mormon hierarchy comes right out and says with their revelations and pronouncements, the thinking has ALREADY BEEN DONE. Clearly, the pew warmers and check writers are not encouraged to ask questions or spend any time considering the folderol and balderdash the LDS poobahs regurgitate all over them. and so many Mormon apologists wind up excommunicated too, thinking about their bat shit crazy theology Joe Smith shit out his ass can do that to ya The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
(March 25, 2016 at 11:17 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote:(March 23, 2016 at 1:25 pm)RozKek Wrote: I have heard and seen many theists ask "How did the universe come into existence? Where did the first cell/matter come from? Where did the Big Bang come from? etc" something along those lines. (Although that is a really weak argument and isn't evidence at all.) I don't understand what you want me to expand on "if you think about it". It's quite simple. Think about if it is logical that the first thing to exist/be is insanely complex with super intelligence, with the ability to do exactly everything, see everything, even change/break the laws of the universe (omnipotent). "And I am questioning how logical is it?" because many theists seem to think the existence of everything is illogical without a God and I am asking you theists how logical is it that the first thing to exist/be is insanely complex with super intelligence, with the ability to do exactly everything, see everything, even change/break the laws of the universe (omnipotent). I don't think I can be more clear than that. I want you to answer how logical it is from your perspective, and good points/arguments to why it would be logical, it seems like you're trying to dodge my question. (March 24, 2016 at 11:17 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: At your local LDS franchise, you get to talk to the elders, and if you don't adjust your attitude, you'll be shown the door. So, there's no downside.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Other than that fucking 10% tithe they squeeze out of everybody.
Walking away from that kind of investment would sting a little . . . The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
(March 24, 2016 at 8:37 am)RozKek Wrote: I think many bypass those because they're heavily affected by a state of cognitive dissonance and confirmation bias. They just have to realise it, but unfortunately many people even ignore their confirmation bias and their cognitive dissonance. It's kind of a chicken and egg problem: which came first, the confirmation bias, or the religious text that specifically cultivates that attitude in order to make its claims more palatable? Can't buy into the latter without the former, and as theistic attitudes to every other religion but their own demonstrate, the former isn't universally present whenever they read religious texts anyway.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects! |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)