Posts: 6010
Threads: 253
Joined: January 2, 2013
Reputation:
30
RE: Transexuals
April 15, 2016 at 9:36 pm
(April 15, 2016 at 9:28 pm)Losty Wrote: (April 15, 2016 at 9:26 pm)paulpablo Wrote: I didn't say offering up control or offering up a service.
I'm saying when a woman wants to have sex with a man and has sex with a man she's utilizing control over what she owns.
When a person hires who they want to hire or sells to who they want to sell to they're utilizing control over what they own. (if it is the owner of the business doing the hiring)
I can't even have this discussion with you because I know you're not a moron. Which means you're pretending a position just to try to prove a point. It's dishonest and annoying. I don't have time for it. Argue it with someone else.
It's not even a position or me pretending I'm just drawing a comparison. You have said that my points are invalid and stupid but haven't shown why.
You believe that a person who owns a business shouldn't have a much control over their business they own as much a woman has over her own body that she owns.
I'm not specifically saying anything for or against that I'm just drawing the comparison that the two both do involve ownership and decision making based on that ownership.
If that's stupid then point out why.
Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.
Impersonation is treason.
Posts: 8214
Threads: 394
Joined: November 2, 2011
Reputation:
44
RE: Transexuals
April 15, 2016 at 9:39 pm
Whether it does or not effect the number of people doing it and make it easier, the problem is you are sacrificing the well being of Transgenders for simply decreasing the amount of peeping my pervs. It's not worth it in my view.
Posts: 28389
Threads: 226
Joined: March 24, 2014
Reputation:
185
RE: Transexuals
April 15, 2016 at 9:40 pm
(April 15, 2016 at 9:39 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: Whether it does or not effect the number of people doing it and make it easier, the problem is you are sacrificing the well being of Transgenders for simply decreasing the amount of peeping my pervs. It's not worth it in my view.
And it truly doesn't make a difference. I don't know where everyone thinks trans women have been peeing all this time...
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay
0/10
Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Posts: 8214
Threads: 394
Joined: November 2, 2011
Reputation:
44
RE: Transexuals
April 15, 2016 at 9:41 pm
(April 15, 2016 at 9:36 pm)paulpablo Wrote: (April 15, 2016 at 9:28 pm)Losty Wrote: I can't even have this discussion with you because I know you're not a moron. Which means you're pretending a position just to try to prove a point. It's dishonest and annoying. I don't have time for it. Argue it with someone else.
It's not even a position or me pretending I'm just drawing a comparison. You have said that my points are invalid and stupid but haven't shown why.
You believe that a person who owns a business shouldn't have a much control over their business they own as much a woman has over her own body that she owns.
I'm not specifically saying anything for or against that I'm just drawing the comparison that the two both do involve ownership and decision making based on that ownership.
If that's stupid then point out why.
Should a business be able to discriminate against a certain religion or sect? Why or why not? Yet when it comes to marriage, we easily can base our decisions on religion or sect? Why or why not?
Posts: 2088
Threads: 6
Joined: January 3, 2016
Reputation:
31
RE: Transexuals
April 15, 2016 at 9:41 pm
(April 15, 2016 at 9:40 pm)Losty Wrote: (April 15, 2016 at 9:39 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: Whether it does or not effect the number of people doing it and make it easier, the problem is you are sacrificing the well being of Transgenders for simply decreasing the amount of peeping my pervs. It's not worth it in my view.
And it truly doesn't make a difference. I don't know where everyone thinks trans women have been peeing all this time...
They've been holding it in, the whole time!
"He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. For if you gaze long into an abyss, the abyss also gazes unto you."
Posts: 9915
Threads: 53
Joined: November 27, 2015
Reputation:
92
Transexuals
April 15, 2016 at 9:44 pm
(April 15, 2016 at 9:41 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: (April 15, 2016 at 9:36 pm)paulpablo Wrote: It's not even a position or me pretending I'm just drawing a comparison. You have said that my points are invalid and stupid but haven't shown why.
You believe that a person who owns a business shouldn't have a much control over their business they own as much a woman has over her own body that she owns.
I'm not specifically saying anything for or against that I'm just drawing the comparison that the two both do involve ownership and decision making based on that ownership.
If that's stupid then point out why.
Should a business be able to discriminate against a certain religion or sect? Why or why not? Yet when it comes to marriage, we easily can base our decisions on religion or sect? Why or why not?
I think businesses should be required to service everyone equally regardless of personal religious beliefs.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Posts: 6010
Threads: 253
Joined: January 2, 2013
Reputation:
30
RE: Transexuals
April 15, 2016 at 9:49 pm
(April 15, 2016 at 9:41 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: (April 15, 2016 at 9:36 pm)paulpablo Wrote: It's not even a position or me pretending I'm just drawing a comparison. You have said that my points are invalid and stupid but haven't shown why.
You believe that a person who owns a business shouldn't have a much control over their business they own as much a woman has over her own body that she owns.
I'm not specifically saying anything for or against that I'm just drawing the comparison that the two both do involve ownership and decision making based on that ownership.
If that's stupid then point out why.
Should a business be able to discriminate against a certain religion or sect? Why or why not? Yet when it comes to marriage, we easily can base our decisions on religion or sect? Why or why not?
I really don't know the answers. As I have said it just depends to what extent you think people should have control over what they own and the method you want to use to interfere with that control.
Besides if I answer you with my gut instinct answer it will severely derail the thread which I don't want to do, if you want to start a new thread I can answer the question there.
Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.
Impersonation is treason.
Posts: 9915
Threads: 53
Joined: November 27, 2015
Reputation:
92
Transexuals
April 15, 2016 at 10:00 pm
(April 15, 2016 at 9:29 pm)Jello Wrote: (April 15, 2016 at 9:27 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: It's okay...it's been a long, hard train wreck of a thread...pun intended, lol. [emoji6]
Is a thread about a controversial topic ever not train wreck-y? 
Anyways, apologies CL, I totally jumped the gun there, too used to that assumption being used far too much D:
Lol, it's okay we've all done it. Some people watch too much Lifetime. (Me).
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Posts: 28389
Threads: 226
Joined: March 24, 2014
Reputation:
185
RE: Transexuals
April 15, 2016 at 10:04 pm
(April 15, 2016 at 10:00 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: (April 15, 2016 at 9:29 pm)Jello Wrote: Is a thread about a controversial topic ever not train wreck-y?
Anyways, apologies CL, I totally jumped the gun there, too used to that assumption being used far too much D:
Lol, it's okay we've all done it. Some people watch too much Lifetime. (Me).
Me too. OMG Bastard Out of Carolina T_T
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay
0/10
Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Posts: 9915
Threads: 53
Joined: November 27, 2015
Reputation:
92
Transexuals
April 15, 2016 at 10:10 pm
(April 15, 2016 at 10:04 pm)Losty Wrote: (April 15, 2016 at 10:00 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Lol, it's okay we've all done it. Some people watch too much Lifetime. (Me).
Me too. OMG Bastard Out of Carolina T_T
Lmao! Never heard of that one! I am a fan of "sleeping with the enemy."
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
|
