42
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
When you know something but can't justify it to yourself.
|
42
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
Hmmm. I think I have the solution.
I shouldn't require justification for belief but when I do have rational justification I should discard my intuition.
You need a hug
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe> RE: When you know something but can't justify it to yourself.
May 28, 2016 at 11:52 pm
(This post was last modified: May 28, 2016 at 11:52 pm by ErGingerbreadMandude.)
What you do is called backwards rationalizing.
You arrive at your conclusion first and then rationalize it. Not rationalize first and conclude afterwards. I believe it is stemmed from a yearning to live up to some expectations some people may have imposed on you, for example if someone important in your life (your mom) wants you to always be a good guy you'll backward rationalize your non-good guy deeds so that you still fit the picture of a good guy , you feel the need to rationalize your behaviors so that they are aligned with the expectations of someone in your life,or your own conscious. You're a people pleaser aka the good guy It means you're good with people. Personally, I've seen this type of behavior in lots of chicks but some guys are no exception either. RE: When you know something but can't justify it to yourself.
May 29, 2016 at 7:10 am
(This post was last modified: May 29, 2016 at 7:12 am by robvalue.)
Listening to your intuition can be the justification. We're not always able to consciously think everything through, with so much going on, and so many past experiences to relate to. Sometimes we don't have time to sit down and work everything through. And especially if our intuition is telling us to play it on the safe side (don't say something possibly offensive, don't go down that dark alleyway) then there's usually little risk in taking the "advice".
Of course, following intuition for more formal inquiries is generally a bad idea, except as a starting point. I also don't feel comfortable that I "know" something unless I can justify it with evidence to myself. This is usually evidence that I think another reasonable person would accept. Another question is how important is the belief? Does it have any impact or significance? If not, then worrying about it is probably wasted effort Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists. Index of useful threads and discussions Index of my best videos Quickstart guide to the forum (May 28, 2016 at 11:52 pm)pool the great Wrote: What you do is called backwards rationalizing. Not valid without accompanying algebraic equations for us laypersons.
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|