Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 19, 2024, 6:15 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Pornography Rule
#21
RE: Pornography Rule
I think that would be going a bit too far, and it would certainly take the fun out of several threads where posting images is the main theme.

Our members report rule violations often, and our mods are diligent, so I think we'll be able to handle moderation of images without the need for approval.
Reply
#22
RE: Pornography Rule
(June 30, 2016 at 8:53 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: Just occured to me, another site I was on years ago had mod approval for all pics.  That is a bit much to task the mods with, but would the forum software permit the addition of a 'mod' tag (instead of a hide tag) that would allow only mods to see the pic, and if not a violation, to remove the tag.

It would also help on occasions when  the tag isn't removed that those of us out in the fora would then be getting feed back where the line is, as I am sure 'the line' is going to a be a subject of much behind the scene mod discussion.

I know I went a very long time without posting any pics here, and it seems I really post scads now.

The mod tag is the tag for the moderator notices. Adding mod approval for pictures is ridiculous. But if it came to that I am sure they'd manage no problem. There's eight moderators and five admins.
Reply
#23
RE: Pornography Rule
(June 30, 2016 at 8:55 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: Is there advertising on Atheist forums? Can't we just all donate a little more money? I mean it's not really a big deal for me personally, because I doubt I ever violate the rule anyway. It's not what I'm here for. I just like to avoid that slippery slope. Just like it's the nature of government to add laws and never repeal them, so too is it the nature of internet forums to add more rules and never get rid of any of the old ones.

There's advertising on all pages for logged out users. Unfortunately we ran the site on donations for several years, and the problem is that people don't just donate a little more money. We've had several large donations in the past that helped the site for a long time, but unfortunately donations these days are rare.

Adding adverts that only appeared for logged out users seemed like a good compromise, because ultimately nobody who joins the site saw them, but they still generated sufficient revenue to pay for the site bills.
Reply
#24
RE: Pornography Rule
How strictly are we going to be enforcing the sexual jokes thing? I think my entire sexual innuendo thread my need to be either deleted or preferably moved to a69
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply
#25
RE: Pornography Rule
(June 30, 2016 at 8:59 pm)Tiberius Wrote:
(June 30, 2016 at 8:55 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: Is there advertising on Atheist forums? Can't we just all donate a little more money? I mean it's not really a big deal for me personally, because I doubt I ever violate the rule anyway. It's not what I'm here for. I just like to avoid that slippery slope. Just like it's the nature of government to add laws and never repeal them, so too is it the nature of internet forums to add more rules and never get rid of any of the old ones.

There's advertising on all pages for logged out users. Unfortunately we ran the site on donations for several years, and the problem is that people don't just donate a little more money. We've had several large donations in the past that helped the site for a long time, but unfortunately donations these days are rare.

Adding adverts that only appeared for logged out users seemed like a good compromise, because ultimately nobody who joins the site saw them, but they still generated sufficient revenue to pay for the site bills.

Maybe you should do a wikipedia style donation drive once a year? Or make a patreon page. I'd be into something like a patreon page. You could make a thermometer where if so much money is raised, we can tell dirty jokes again.
[Image: dcep7c.jpg]
Reply
#26
RE: Pornography Rule
(June 30, 2016 at 8:55 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: Just like it's the nature of government to add laws and never repeal them, so too is it the nature of internet forums to add more rules and never get rid of any of the old ones.

That's not accurate, at least as far as AF is concerned. We've had plenty of rules that are no longer on the books; just off the top of my head there's the old "no preaching" one, for example. Then there was our Prime Directive, gone the way of all things. Our rules are constantly being revised and updated.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
#27
RE: Pornography Rule
This may get interesting. For visuals, I'm gonna play it like broadcast US TV. I may end up pushing the envelope verbally, but then I think a lot will.
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.
Reply
#28
RE: Pornography Rule
Quote:Republicunt is in half of the political threads here.

I'll re-double my efforts!
Reply
#29
RE: Pornography Rule
(June 30, 2016 at 9:45 pm)Minimalist Wrote:
Quote:Republicunt is in half of the political threads here.

I'll re-double my efforts!

And a penis is in all.
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.
Reply
#30
RE: Pornography Rule
So... my avatar? I'm fairly attached to it...
Nolite te bastardes carborundorum.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  PSA: Hate Speech, rule 7 arewethereyet 24 2381 September 21, 2023 at 7:14 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  PSA: Update to necroposting rule arewethereyet 51 6364 April 3, 2023 at 2:33 am
Last Post: Goosebump
  PSA: Added to threats rule arewethereyet 8 2784 May 19, 2022 at 12:42 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  PSA: The Necroposting Rule BrianSoddingBoru4 42 6410 April 6, 2022 at 3:03 pm
Last Post: brewer
  PSA - Clarification of rule #3 on doxxing. arewethereyet 18 3608 November 17, 2021 at 5:11 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  [Serious] Proposing A Rule Change BrianSoddingBoru4 24 4863 June 11, 2020 at 11:30 pm
Last Post: Ranjr
  PSA: New Rule BrianSoddingBoru4 75 13494 July 22, 2019 at 8:19 am
Last Post: LastPoet
  The 30/30 rule Losty 3 1260 June 27, 2018 at 10:28 pm
Last Post: Jackalope
  Pedophilia Rule Modification Tiberius 3 1170 June 27, 2018 at 12:28 am
Last Post: robvalue
  New Rule - Promoting Terrorism Tiberius 65 11320 June 21, 2018 at 1:33 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)