RE: [split] Peanut Gallery Commentary-and the drama over the nudity thread continues
July 11, 2016 at 12:30 am
(This post was last modified: July 11, 2016 at 12:31 am by bennyboy.)
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 10, 2025, 7:31 am
Thread Rating:
[split] Peanut Gallery Commentary-and the drama over the nudity thread continues
|
RE: [split] Peanut Gallery Commentary-and the drama over the nudity thread continues
July 11, 2016 at 12:58 am
(This post was last modified: July 11, 2016 at 12:59 am by robvalue.)
The ONI rule is for people who purposefully and skilfully skirt the rules, making it extremely hard to take action, while causing a lot of real damage.
It's meant to be a last resort, to plug any remaining gaps in the rules. We can't cover absolutely everything. We can't predict exactly what some maniac might do in the future. So we have a way of making sure that we can deal with such people, if it gets really serious. Hopefully one of the other rules will cover it. If so, great. If not... you want them fucking up the whole forum while we try and write a new rule for whatever insidious crap they are doing? As Losty said, we've never used it since setting it up. I hope we never do. It's quite possible we won't. It's certainly not there to try and generally shut people up who are disagreeing with us. Anyone who feels that way has things completely wrong, I can assure you. People are welcome to disagree with us all day long. Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists. Index of useful threads and discussions Index of my best videos Quickstart guide to the forum RE: [split] Peanut Gallery Commentary-and the drama over the nudity thread continues
July 11, 2016 at 2:45 am
I would have voted to use the ONI option exactly once: DespondentFishDeathMachismo.
Every other instance anyone could think of, I would have voted against, therefore killing the vote. Before anyone suggests it, he who shall not be named broke so many other rules that ONI would not have been an option.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<--- RE: [split] Peanut Gallery Commentary-and the drama over the nudity thread continues
July 11, 2016 at 3:01 am
Who, Thunder Cunt?
RE: [split] Peanut Gallery Commentary-and the drama over the nudity thread continues
July 11, 2016 at 3:03 am
I doubt we will ever use it, to be honest.
It's like an emergency containment procedure for a new kind of disease we have no idea how to deal with. You'll be really glad it's there on the off chance it's needed. Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists. Index of useful threads and discussions Index of my best videos Quickstart guide to the forum RE: [split] Peanut Gallery Commentary-and the drama over the nudity thread continues
July 11, 2016 at 3:23 am
We could always use it for getting rid of someone we don't like that hasn't done anything wrong. :-)
RE: [split] Peanut Gallery Commentary-and the drama over the nudity thread continues
July 11, 2016 at 3:26 am
I can just do that anyway. A couple of clicks and someone is banned.
I just wouldn't get away with it abuse my power like that. Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists. Index of useful threads and discussions Index of my best videos Quickstart guide to the forum RE: [split] Peanut Gallery Commentary-and the drama over the nudity thread continues
July 11, 2016 at 4:18 am
(This post was last modified: July 11, 2016 at 4:19 am by Edwardo Piet.)
Anytime someone protests about "unfair treatment" I just wanna permanently ban their ass immediately. Sure it would prove them right when they're wrong as fuck which is why it is so annoying but at least I would enjoy screaming "FUCK YEAH!" and dancing about like a fuckturtle. I'm a very calm and levelheaded staff member and that's why I make a good mod.
RE: [split] Peanut Gallery Commentary-and the drama over the nudity thread continues
July 11, 2016 at 8:06 am
RE: [split] Peanut Gallery Commentary-and the drama over the nudity thread continues
July 11, 2016 at 8:36 am
I'm pretty sure it was TC.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like. | Whateverist | 4493 | 784347 |
March 31, 2021 at 5:55 am Last Post: The Valkyrie |
|
Nudity, Is It Sexist In This Forum? | Heatheness | 702 | 78346 |
July 7, 2016 at 2:08 am Last Post: Thumpalumpacus |
|
[split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action | Shell B | 94 | 47308 |
June 2, 2012 at 1:27 pm Last Post: kılıç_mehmet |
|
[split] Quoting Full Articles | Violet | 8 | 4105 |
April 27, 2010 at 11:34 am Last Post: Tiberius |
Users browsing this thread: 34 Guest(s)