Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 27, 2024, 5:32 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Reverse Pascals Wager
#11
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager
(August 20, 2010 at 3:26 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: I think our version of Pascal's Wager should be:

If God is just, what does the unbeliever have to fear?
If God is not just, what does the believer hope to serve?

Long version:

Ok, let's assume there's a god. Let's assume there's an afterlife. Let's assume said afterlife is the judgment day model that Islamo-Christians are so fond of. All that assumed, what is this judgment based on?

If God is just, than our character would be fairly evaluated regardless of how much we suck up. What kind of a judge let's criminals go just because they say "you're so great!"? If this is the case, God's favor couldn't be bought with praise and faith. Our character would have to be evaluated without prejudice. If this is the case, what do we need religion for? We can follow our own moral compass and be just fine by trying to live as best as we can, just like if there were no afterlife.

If God evaluates our character on our faith, then Islamo-Christians abandon all pretense that they serve a just god. Heaven becomes a reward for the suck-ups while Hell is a purile punishment for those who won't kiss his ass. Religion has a purpose but only in being sycophantic to an unjust god.

Why do you presume you can set the rules for God's court. God has already set the rules and guess what you can not get in on your own merit it will not stand up to God's rules. There are two ways one can enter heaven.
1) You can be judged by God's perfect standard by your own merit. (Fail)
2) You can allow Christ and His perfect life to stand in your place and be jugded for you. (Pass)
Islam and Christianity do not share the same God.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
Reply
#12
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager
Quote:What I find amusing about Pascal's so-called wager is it reduces faith (which is presumably central to Christianity) to a mere bet

Even better, it reduces their so-called "all-knowing" god to a buffoon who is easily fooled.

Reply
#13
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager
(August 20, 2010 at 2:27 pm)Captain Scarlet Wrote: Part of what makes us human is overcoming adversity, being able to grow as people, struggling, feeling loss as well as great joy. Could anyone really say they want to go to heaven. Mindless worshipping living in joy forever!

Well if you find Heaven dull or mindless or unappealing in any way then it's clearly not "heaven". Heaven surely would have to be, heavenly, otherwise it's not Heaven.

Likewise, Hell cannot be pleasant in any way otherwise it's clearly not "Hell", hell surely must be hellish by definition.

Assuming we go by Heaven=eternal bliss and hell=eternal torture.... Heaven must be blissful and Hell must be torturous.

Reply
#14
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4AXOmPZ6fo



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply
#15
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager
Quote:Islam and Christianity do not share the same God.
They don't? I thought they just disagreed on who was the chosen son of Abram. Yes it's in Genesis, but that's after the god created everything. Yeah, the god does some different things, but originally–same one––and then Jesus comes along.
[Image: siggy2_by_Cego_Colher.jpg]
Reply
#16
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager
@downbeatplumb

That's an argument I've used before, although without the bit about angels and cream cakes XD
Reply
#17
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager
(August 21, 2010 at 10:04 am)Cego_Colher Wrote:
Quote:Islam and Christianity do not share the same God.
They don't? I thought they just disagreed on who was the chosen son of Abram. Yes it's in Genesis, but that's after the god created everything. Yeah, the god does some different things, but originally–same one––and then Jesus comes along.
No the god of Islam is very different in many ways that are incompatible with the Christian God.
Reply
#18
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager
(August 21, 2010 at 12:54 am)Godschild Wrote: Why do you presume you can set the rules for God's court. God has already set the rules and guess what you can not get in on your own merit it will not stand up to God's rules. There are two ways one can enter heaven.
And you base this on what? The bible? It has already been established that the bible isn't worth the toilet paper it is printed on. Try again.
Quote:1) You can be judged by God's perfect standard by your own merit. (Fail)
2) You can allow Christ and His perfect life to stand in your place and be jugded for you. (Pass)
So you can live a good moral life and it won't mean a friggin' thing unless you are prepared to massage gods delicate little ego by telling him how wonderful he is every damn day, for eternity.
How very,very just.......
I'll also make the point that your pathetic little god appears to be punishing us for his own ineptitude in the(according to the bible anyway) way he made us.
Quote:Islam and Christianity do not share the same God.
Yes they do.

P.s god isn't perfect, not if he doesn't know that bats are mammals, not birds.
[Image: mybannerglitter06eee094.gif]
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.
Reply
#19
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager
(August 21, 2010 at 3:47 am)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote:
(August 20, 2010 at 2:27 pm)Captain Scarlet Wrote: Part of what makes us human is overcoming adversity, being able to grow as people, struggling, feeling loss as well as great joy. Could anyone really say they want to go to heaven. Mindless worshipping living in joy forever!
Well if you find Heaven dull or mindless or unappealing in any way then it's clearly not "heaven". Heaven surely would have to be, heavenly, otherwise it's not Heaven.
Likewise, Hell cannot be pleasant in any way otherwise it's clearly not "Hell", hell surely must be hellish by definition.
Assuming we go by Heaven=eternal bliss and hell=eternal torture.... Heaven must be blissful and Hell must be torturous.
That would be a relativist view surely. So a masochistic may naturally choose hell but if they meet gods standards heaven for them would be hell. Surely that is wrong. From what we are told heaven seems dull and sterile.
Reply
#20
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager
Well surely Heaven and Hell has to be subjective otherwise they are pointless as concepts.

A masochist enjoys pain (maybe not absolute torture though... but pain at least), so pain for him/her is pleasure. Hence why pleasure is subjective. And so is Heaven and Hell then.

If we are to define Heaven as "Eternal Bliss" and Hell as "Eternal torture", then since pleasure and pain are subjective, since emotions themselves are subjective, of course it's relative to the person somewhat.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Problem with Pascal's Wager Rhondazvous 45 6767 May 11, 2018 at 7:27 am
Last Post: brewer
  A response to "upping the ante" on pascals wager Won2blv 26 3703 April 12, 2016 at 8:21 pm
Last Post: Won2blv
  Atheist version of Pascal's wager Nihilist Virus 57 10596 February 4, 2016 at 3:07 pm
Last Post: RobbyPants



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)