Wikileaks publishes Podesta emails

[Minimalist]

who later helped oversee

So McAuliffe had a crystal ball?

Fuck Drumpf and all his idiot fans.

[Aroura]

Wikileaks is no longer viewed as whistle blowers, but an organization with an agenda, and so it has lost a lot of credibility with a lot of people.

It finds and releases info about how corrupt our political system is? no, it's not doing that. it's focusing very, very hard on one piece of the system. if it was an unbiased information source, we'd be seeing the same corrupt kind of shit from the RNC as well. If you think one side is playing these political games behind the scenes and the other isn't, then you aren't living in reality.

Nothing surprising has been released, it pretty much seems politics as usual. The only surprising thing is, is how lopsided this supposed non biased whistle blowing has been.

[abaris]

Wikileaks is no longer viewed as whistle blowers, but an organization with an agenda, and so it has lost a lot of credibility with a lot of people.

The emails are real. But you're right, of course. Assange has lost all respect I had for him during these last four years. Not because of attacking Clinton, because I hate her guts. It's just curious that he and his toy boys only focus on her campaign without digging up some dirt on her opponent. And there's no shortage of that in Trump's vita. Also curious that RT is always the first to report on the newest wikileaks findings.

But wikileaks lost the last shred of my respect by throwing Bradley Mannings to the wolves, along with the informants, who's names they published. It was also the time when Assange's cofounders of the platform left him and openly called him a self centered asshole. The more I hear from him, the more I agree. He's become a tool and does a bad service to every whistleblower out there.

[Minimalist]

The emails are real.

But they have not been authenticated.  Drumpf's Russian pals are certainly not above inserting a word or phrase to help their ally out.

[abaris]

But they have not been authenticated.

No? Don't you think the campaign would run a large scale counter attack by this time? Apart from that Podesta character saying they were real when the first bunch was published.

Assange probably is in Russia's pocket, but that doesn't change the fact that your gal is dirty too. Wise up, man, you really start to give the appearance of buying every load of bullshit coming from her. I didn't say anything so far, since I consider her the lesser evil still. But your Hilary flag waving is getting really old very fast. Can't wait for the 8th and you and the rest of the world will have to deal with how evil the lesser evil can be. I'm not looking forward to make that experience.

[Minimalist]

You do have to listen.

http://crooksandliars.com/2016/10/megyn-...ir-reading

After being cautioned by her guests that the emails were unauthenticated and therefore shouldn't be considered anything to be discussing, she continued to try to hammer on the "bucket of losers" phrase.
At the end of her show, she read this statement.
"Team Clinton strongly denies that she called anyone a bucket of losers. That was apparently a doctored quote and not real. We apologize for that error."

[vorlon13]

Maybe the republicans have heard of McAfee malware protection and the democrats haven't ??

It literally could be as simple as that.

Or the 'pubs are still using Kaypros . . . .

[Thumpalumpacus]

Pfft, give me a 99/4A any day.

[Aractus]

Code:

Date: 2015-07-25 00:28
Subject: Re: Cnn poll

Do we actually know who told Hillary she could use a private email?  And has that person been drawn and quartered?

Like whole thing is fucking insane.

And:

Code:

Date: 2015-03-07 16:01
Subject: Re: HRC and the email flap

There
Is
Just
No
Good
Answer

We need to gut through the process phase, get them all out there and let the content do the talking.

LOL! Look at the way it's formatted too.

[Pat Mustard]

Wall Street Journal (not Tin Foil Hat Land, for any Correct The Record trolls here)

Calling the WSJ "not tin foil hat land" is frankly laughable. That paper has two policies, 1) within the finance paper report relatively accurately in favour of big business and 2) in the editorial section champion every far right conspiracy wingnuttery dismissed by Breitbart and Alex James as too obviously untrue.