Posts: 12743
Threads: 92
Joined: January 3, 2016
Reputation:
85
RE: U.S. 2016: For whom will you vote?
October 27, 2016 at 3:30 am
(This post was last modified: October 27, 2016 at 4:16 am by account_inactive.
Edit Reason: Corrected "all right" to "alright" Tired Bella is tired.
)
(October 27, 2016 at 3:26 am)Aractus Wrote: I would love to see Russia, China, and India form an alliance to disarm the United States of their Nuclear weapons. Someone needs to put a fucking stop to the world's leading terror state, sooner rather than later.
Alright, so you want to disarm the US but let the other nations you mentioned above keep their nuclear stockpiles?
No thanks.
Posts: 8090
Threads: 47
Joined: September 12, 2015
Reputation:
41
RE: U.S. 2016: For whom will you vote?
October 27, 2016 at 3:39 am
(October 24, 2016 at 8:57 pm)Faith No More Wrote: (October 24, 2016 at 5:22 pm)Cato Wrote: As of this moment, I will likely cast my vote for Johnson. I say 'likely' since I have considered not voting for POTUS; however, since I will be voting on other items know I'll have trouble leaving the POTUS choice blank. I will not vote for Clinton or Trump.
For those that argue I should vote considering the potential impact on others; I get the argument but maintain that it's too late. Nobody, Democrats nor Republicans, gave me much consideration when selecting these two buffoons. I could have voted for the likes of O'Malley or Webb in lieu of Trump, but Clinton is a non-starter for me and many others, regardless of how toxic Trump is. As far as going the other direction, I would have voted for Kasich; maybe even Rand Paul with the requirement of a decontaminating scrub and shower afterwards, if either faced Clinton.
[bold mine]
You don't like the two main buffoons nominated, so you're going to vote for a third buffoon?
Who's third party simply because he stormed off from the republicans in a huff because they wouldn't pick him as their candidate. And who when reublican governor of NM was essentially batting for the donminionist evangelical wing of the tea party.
That's what I don't get about libertarians in the US, they don't mind republicans being imposed on them (I have a different grief with libertarians in general, viz they support a braindead political philosophy).
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Posts: 15351
Threads: 118
Joined: January 13, 2014
Reputation:
117
RE: U.S. 2016: For whom will you vote?
October 27, 2016 at 3:59 am
(October 27, 2016 at 3:30 am)Bella Morte Wrote: All right, so you want to disarm the US but let the other nations you mentioned above keep their nuclear stockpile?
No thanks.
He is not familiar with such reasoned thought. His hatred for the US is clearly blinding.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Posts: 12743
Threads: 92
Joined: January 3, 2016
Reputation:
85
RE: U.S. 2016: For whom will you vote?
October 27, 2016 at 4:07 am
(This post was last modified: October 27, 2016 at 4:16 am by account_inactive.)
(October 27, 2016 at 3:59 am)SteelCurtain Wrote: (October 27, 2016 at 3:30 am)Bella Morte Wrote: Alright, so you want to disarm the US but let the other nations you mentioned above keep their nuclear stockpiles?
No thanks.
He is not familiar with such reasoned thought. His hatred for the US is clearly blinding.
Yeah, I always get a good laugh when he starts his anti-US rants.
Posts: 4484
Threads: 185
Joined: October 12, 2012
Reputation:
44
RE: U.S. 2016: For whom will you vote?
October 27, 2016 at 5:06 am
(October 27, 2016 at 3:30 am)Bella Morte Wrote: (October 27, 2016 at 3:26 am)Aractus Wrote: I would love to see Russia, China, and India form an alliance to disarm the United States of their Nuclear weapons. Someone needs to put a fucking stop to the world's leading terror state, sooner rather than later.
Alright, so you want to disarm the US but let the other nations you mentioned above keep their nuclear stockpiles?
No thanks.
I trust China with them far more that I trust the USA. The USA has already used them at wartime, and unlike China they go around instigating wars.
For Religion & Health see:[/b][/size] Williams & Sternthal. (2007). Spirituality, religion and health: Evidence and research directions. Med. J. Aust., 186(10), S47-S50. -LINK
The WIN/Gallup End of Year Survey 2013 found the US was perceived to be the greatest threat to world peace by a huge margin, with 24% of respondents fearful of the US followed by: 8% for Pakistan, and 6% for China. This was followed by 5% each for: Afghanistan, Iran, Israel, North Korea. -LINK
"That's disgusting. There were clean athletes out there that have had their whole careers ruined by people like Lance Armstrong who just bended thoughts to fit their circumstances. He didn't look up cheating because he wanted to stop, he wanted to justify what he was doing and to keep that continuing on." - Nicole Cooke
Posts: 21963
Threads: 24
Joined: February 2, 2010
Reputation:
106
RE: U.S. 2016: For whom will you vote?
October 27, 2016 at 6:50 am
(This post was last modified: October 27, 2016 at 6:51 am by Thumpalumpacus.)
(October 27, 2016 at 5:06 am)Aractus Wrote: (October 27, 2016 at 3:30 am)Bella Morte Wrote: Alright, so you want to disarm the US but let the other nations you mentioned above keep their nuclear stockpiles?
No thanks.
I trust China with them far more that I trust the USA. The USA has already used them at wartime, and unlike China they go around instigating wars.
It's a shame that our foreign policy shields people like you from the repercussions of your own opinions. Without American nukes, Australia would be a Chinese protectorate in a couple of generations.
Posts: 13051
Threads: 66
Joined: February 7, 2011
Reputation:
92
RE: U.S. 2016: For whom will you vote?
October 27, 2016 at 7:10 am
(This post was last modified: October 27, 2016 at 7:10 am by Faith No More.)
(October 27, 2016 at 3:26 am)Aractus Wrote: But war crimes deserve life imprisonment, and I believe wholeheartedly that Bill Clinton, George W, Dick Cheney, Obama, Hillary, and no doubt many others, should be convicted for war crimes - just like Germany has been doing to WWII war criminals.
You just keep saying she's guilty of war crimes. What specifically has she done to be guilty of that?
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Posts: 4484
Threads: 185
Joined: October 12, 2012
Reputation:
44
RE: U.S. 2016: For whom will you vote?
October 27, 2016 at 7:30 am
(October 27, 2016 at 6:50 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: (October 27, 2016 at 5:06 am)Aractus Wrote: I trust China with them far more that I trust the USA. The USA has already used them at wartime, and unlike China they go around instigating wars.
It's a shame that our foreign policy shields people like you from the repercussions of your own opinions. Without American nukes, Australia would be a Chinese protectorate in a couple of generations.
No it wouldn't because China doesn't want to invade other sovereign states.
(October 27, 2016 at 7:10 am)Faith No More Wrote: You just keep saying she's guilty of war crimes. What specifically has she done to be guilty of that?
I've already listed it out before. She armed ISIL in its infancy. She invaded Libya, even though she was advised against it by military personnel. You know who else overrode the advice of his military? Hitler.
For Religion & Health see:[/b][/size] Williams & Sternthal. (2007). Spirituality, religion and health: Evidence and research directions. Med. J. Aust., 186(10), S47-S50. -LINK
The WIN/Gallup End of Year Survey 2013 found the US was perceived to be the greatest threat to world peace by a huge margin, with 24% of respondents fearful of the US followed by: 8% for Pakistan, and 6% for China. This was followed by 5% each for: Afghanistan, Iran, Israel, North Korea. -LINK
"That's disgusting. There were clean athletes out there that have had their whole careers ruined by people like Lance Armstrong who just bended thoughts to fit their circumstances. He didn't look up cheating because he wanted to stop, he wanted to justify what he was doing and to keep that continuing on." - Nicole Cooke
Posts: 13392
Threads: 187
Joined: March 18, 2012
Reputation:
48
RE: U.S. 2016: For whom will you vote?
October 27, 2016 at 8:27 am
already voted for trump
Posts: 13392
Threads: 187
Joined: March 18, 2012
Reputation:
48
RE: U.S. 2016: For whom will you vote?
October 27, 2016 at 8:29 am
(October 27, 2016 at 5:06 am)Aractus Wrote: (October 27, 2016 at 3:30 am)Bella Morte Wrote: Alright, so you want to disarm the US but let the other nations you mentioned above keep their nuclear stockpiles?
No thanks.
I trust China with them far more that I trust the USA. The USA has already used them at wartime, and unlike China they go around instigating wars.
So You haven't heard of North Korea yet?
|
