Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔

[The Joker]

You are still passing off the work of other people as your own. Paint it up however makes you feel better, but it is still a dishonest action. If you don't feel shame about it, then you are an immoral and bad person. I am so embarrassed for you right now.

If I took a video by someone else and made you believe it was my work, would that be right?

No It wouldn't, but in atheism there is no real right and wrong so according to atheism it doesn't matter, Friend. But anyway, Why is dishonesty the object of morality? If you do not have an objective standard of morality by which you can determine what is right or wrong, then how are your moral values not just based on your subjective opinions? If you do not have an objective standard of morality by which you can determine what is right or wrong, then what gives you the right to make moral judgments upon me that I am dishonest?

[Crossless2.0]

"Life didn't evolve from a rock, it was made from dirt.  TOTALLY DIFFERENT!"

Then it is still stupid.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLI0GMMbQaQ


Don't recognize your own holy book, dumbass?  

[The Joker]

Then it is still stupid.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLI0GMMbQaQ


Don't recognize your own holy book, dumbass?  

Yes brother, I do

[LastPoet]

You are still passing off the work of other people as your own. Paint it up however makes you feel better, but it is still a dishonest action. If you don't feel shame about it, then you are an immoral and bad person. I am so embarrassed for you right now.

If I took a video by someone else and made you believe it was my work, would that be right?

No It wouldn't, but in atheism there is no real right and wrong so according to atheism it doesn't matter, Friend. But anyway, Why is dishonesty the object of morality? If you do not have an objective standard of morality by which you can determine what is right or wrong, then how are your moral values not just based on your subjective opinions? If you do not have an objective standard of morality by which you can determine what is right or wrong, then what gives you the right to make moral judgments upon me that I am dishonest?

You notice that Stimbo's username is in red right? We have rules.

[Whateverist]

Extreme stupidity is impossible to tell from extreme farce but I really think the joker dumbass is some pimply teenage boy atheist on a lark. His comments lack subtlety or originality. Bored with this guy.

[Cyberman]

And we're not discussing atheist morality vs xtian morality, we're discussing your moral understanding. I seriously don't give a flying fox whose morality is superior; that's totally irrelevant. You asked why it's wrong and I told you. Now as far as this forum is concerned, plagiarism is a violation of forum rules. Rules that you agreed to abide by when you signed up here.

This is not up for negotiation.

[Whateverist]

And we're not discussing atheist morality vs xtian morality, we're discussing your moral understanding. I seriously don't give a flying fox whose morality is superior; that's totally irrelevant. You asked why it's wrong and I told you. Now as far as this forum is concerned, plagiarism is a violation of forum rules. Rules that you agreed to abide by when you signed up here.

This is not up for negotiation.

And as an annoying cunt just here to rattle a stick around inside the bee's nest it would behoove you to observe the rules if you still enjoy your little game.

[The Joker]

No It wouldn't, but in atheism there is no real right and wrong so according to atheism it doesn't matter, Friend. But anyway, Why is dishonesty the object of morality? If you do not have an objective standard of morality by which you can determine what is right or wrong, then how are your moral values not just based on your subjective opinions? If you do not have an objective standard of morality by which you can determine what is right or wrong, then what gives you the right to make moral judgments upon me that I am dishonest?

You notice that Stimbo's username is in red right? We have rules.

Yes, you have rules and I am not in opposition to it, but what I am saying is that, if atheism is true, then in atheism there is no real right and wrong so according to atheism it doesn't matter, Friend. But anyway, Why is dishonesty the object of morality? If you do not have an objective standard of morality by which you can determine what is right or wrong, then how are your moral values not just based on your subjective opinions? If you do not have an objective standard of morality by which you can determine what is right or wrong, then what gives you the right to make moral judgments upon me that I am dishonest? Because in atheism there is no objective morality but morality is subjective. So why is lying the object of morality?

There most be a moral giver, that moral giver is God.

[Amarok]

Ah the tired old atheists have not magic sky daddy so no morality exists blahda blahda says someone who likely has never actually studied meta ethics or ethical theory but is content to mindlessly spew creationist talking points. No serious philosopher of either considers  theism moral foundations tenable (because there not). Oh and you have of coursed shaped morality in theistic image then chide us for our morality not conforming to a theistic framework talk about a self fulfilling prophesy. And lastly your whole argument is a false narrative based on presup nonsense no matter how much you repeat it .

Lastly  Kent Hovid is an idiot so plagiarism or not all you have done is copy crap

[Cyberman]

Joker, if you want to discuss that as a subject, make a thread about it. Stop throwing red herrings around like a baby throwing his toys.