Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔

[Cyberman]

Ok, it's obviously time for the grownups to leave the baby alone until he finishes with his diarrhoea.

[The Joker]

There is no evidence for biological evolution.

yes accept the whole of biology, chemistry, genetics,paleontology etc

---

There is no evidence for biological evolution.

---

I am asking you that who said it was? Morality is based on absolute reason of right and wrong? Why is morality absolute? Who made us that way?

1. No it's not 

2. Circular reasoning

But the Law of Biogenesis states that "only life can create life", so where is the evidence for evolution?

[Amarok]

But the Law of Bio-genesis states that only life can create life, so where is the evidence for evolution?

sigh three points 

1. Your conflating two different theories abiogenisis and evolution there not the same thing and it's wholly dishonest to try and use one to debunk the other 

2. The law of biogenisis was proposed to debunk spontaneous generation and thus doesn't apply to abiogenisis your once again using a scientific law to tear down something it wasn't intended for .And no the fact life CURRENTLY comes from other life speaks of the perpetuation of life not it's origins.(actually universally it's all chemistry wether organic or inorgnic)

3.There plenty of evidence for both abiogenisis so even if the law opposed it. It would simply be the case that said law was wrong like laws before it .Science advances that's why it's not religion  

lastly my comment was about your statements about morality not evolution

[Angrboda]

Evolution is false as proven here, if you are willing to watch you will understand.

First you say that evolution is unfalsifiable, now you say it's been proven false. You can't have it both ways.

[Tonus]

I am asking you that who said it was? Morality is based on absolute reason of right and wrong? Why is morality absolute? Who made us that way?

No one said it was. Moral values can be reasoned out. What is this need for absolutes? I have yet to see a system of moral values that were all absolute.

[Cyberman]

I know any trolls present won't bother, but for everyone else:

[Amarok]

I know any trolls present won't bother, but for everyone else:





so you know him too 

---

I know any trolls present won't bother, but for everyone else:





so you know him too 

---

I know any trolls present won't bother, but for everyone else:





so you know him too 

[The Joker]

Evolution is false as proven here, if you are willing to watch you will understand.

First you say that evolution is unfalsifiable, now you say it's been proven false.  You can't have it both ways.

Evolution is falsifiable in the on the sense its unprovable.

[Cyberman]

You are still passing off the work of other people as your own. Paint it up however makes you feel better, but it is still a dishonest action. If you don't feel shame about it, then you are an immoral and bad person. I am so embarrassed for you right now.

If I took a video by someone else and made you believe it was my work, would that be right?

No It wouldn't, but in atheism there is no real right and wrong so according to atheism it doesn't matter, Friend. But anyway, Why is dishonesty the object of morality? If you do not have an objective standard of morality by which you can determine what is right or wrong, then how are your moral values not just based on your subjective opinions? If you do not have an objective standard of morality by which you can determine what is right or wrong, then what gives you the right to make moral judgments upon me that I am dishonest?

I don't care a wet fart about any of this herring shit. There is no "according to atheism", but even that's not relevant and I'm not going to bother chasing you on that. So quit trying.

Forget about "atheist" and "xtian" for two seconds. Is theft of another person's work right or wrong?

Put it this way. I know someone with an eight-year-old boy; even he knows the eifference between right and wrong. I don't believe for a nanosecond that you're as idiotic as you want to pretend.

[Amarok]

Evolution is falsifiable in the on the sense its unprovable

.
that makes no fucking sense 

-Evolution is falsifiable in the sense that it's key ideas are open to contradictory evidence or it's core ideas can be tested in the negative just like any other scientific idea. It's simply that the evidence in it's favor has reached a point where the probability of that is near zero  

-Nothing in science is ever proven  science does't deal in proof so no evolution being unproven will not faslefy it only evidence or reason to the contrary can overturn the theory but as i said good luck with that