Play "Cards Against Atheist Forums" online now!
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: 20th July 2017, 20:32

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Heated debate on evolution with brother
RE: Heated debate on evolution with brother
(30th April 2017, 14:13)snowtracks Wrote:
(30th April 2017, 04:03)downbeatplumb Wrote: This has been explained to you.
Soft bodies do not fossilise well and small or single celled organisms are hard to find.
Your argument that they magically poofed into existence is laughable and kinda sad.
"Soft bodies do not fossilise well and small or single celled organisms are hard to find." - Soft bodies do not fossilize well or not so well; researcher haven't even been searching for single cell organisms in the Precambrian era.
All soft bodies directly to all fossils for all these phyla does not support the dictums of evolutionary theory.



Quote:"Soft bodies do not fossilise well and small or single celled organisms are hard to find." - Soft bodies do not fossilize well or not so well; researcher haven't even been searching for single cell organisms in the Precambrian era.

Ok so you agree with me then?
I really cant tell.


"All soft bodies directly to all fossils for all these phyla does not support the dictums of evolutionary theory."


What does that sentence mean, I'd try to answer it bit it looks like "some nonsense, therefore no evolution"
Opinions are like arseholes.
Once somethings firmly in there its very hard to dislodge.





 








Reply
RE: Heated debate on evolution with brother
(30th April 2017, 18:46)Neo-Scholastic Wrote:
(29th April 2017, 19:32)bennyboy Wrote: This is why religious ideas fail.  They do not evolve.  They do not respond to information.  

That's not entirely true. There is the idea of progressive revelation. There is also the idea that churches gradually get corrupted and need reformation. God remains the same but our understanding changes as He changes us. That's just an outline. The notion is much more complex than that though.

"We make shit up as we go"
Reply
RE: Heated debate on evolution with brother
It's time for god to progressively reveal that his followers no longer need to tie themselves into knots in order to deny a biological reality.  If godidit...modern synth is -how- goddidit.
Eat em up beat em up then switch sides.


Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why Debate a Teenager? Goosebump 16 1467 25th April 2016, 11:10
Last Post: Aegon
  Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false Rob216 206 13895 10th November 2014, 14:02
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  Free Will - A new angle on an old debate ManMachine 3 1204 11th June 2013, 19:22
Last Post: ManMachine
  Flying in the face of the organic debate Justtristo 1 1083 24th April 2013, 21:03
Last Post: Khemikal
  Intelligent design type evolution vs naturalism type evolution. MysticKnight 59 21178 6th April 2013, 17:12
Last Post: Khemikal



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)