4 Arrested In FB Video Torturing Of A Mentally Challenged Man

[SteelCurtain]

How can they raise much controversy when mostly everyone who replies to his 'Damn' threads are the fragile little SJW snowflakes who agrees with him.

So, why don't you reply? Needs an actual answer to the incidents he posts though. Which you obviously don't have. Otherwise you would reply and refute what he posts.

Not only that, but the vast majority of those threads are Min's personal echo chamber. His post count is that way for a reason.

But nay, it's much easier to call everyone who doesn't overtly disagree with Min a SJW than refute the points he makes in the threads. Messes up one's reality to see it any other way.

[Amarok]

How can they raise much controversy when mostly everyone who replies to his 'Damn' threads are the fragile little SJW snowflakes who agrees with him.

So, why don't you reply? Needs an actual answer to the incidents he posts though. Which you obviously don't have. Otherwise you would reply and refute what he posts.

Yup 'ab' the people who don't respond to the damned thread are bitter no nothings who have nothing to say  nor anything constructive to offer but will whine at those who do

see A I can be a douche too

---

So, why don't you reply? Needs an actual answer to the incidents he posts though. Which you obviously don't have. Otherwise you would reply and refute what he posts.

Not only that, but the vast majority of those threads are Min's personal echo chamber. His post count is that way for a reason.

But nay, it's much easier to call everyone who doesn't overtly disagree with Min a SJW than refute the points he makes in the threads. Messes up one's reality to see it any other way.

Well yeah that would take effort and intelligence something A has in short supply

Again my  A Theist Douche impression

[A Theist]

How can they raise much controversy when mostly everyone who replies to his 'Damn' threads are the fragile little SJW snowflakes who agrees with him.

So, why don't you reply? Needs an actual answer to the incidents he posts though. Which you obviously don't have. Otherwise you would reply and refute what he posts.

My thoughts exactly. I was going to put that in my response but didn't. I did reply to some his stuff some time back, but not often enough though. Has he responded to this thread yet? Wonder if he'll admit that this was a racially motivated hate crime? What do you think? Was it racially motivated?

[abaris]

What do you think? Was it racially motivated?

Didn't i make myself clear already? It was a hate crime. Wether it was racially motivated, against a disabled person or both is entirely irrelevant. It was a hate crime and it was despicable. There's nothing more to say.

[Amarok]

What do you think? Was it racially motivated?

Didn't i make myself clear already? It was a hate crime. Wether it was racially motivated, against a disabled person or both is entirely irrelevant. It was a hate crime and it was despicable. There's nothing more to say.

Agreed it's not relevant these animals beat that poor guy there motivations for doing so would be no less evil were it finical or just for fun you don't do that shit unless you are really fucked in the head

---

So, why don't you reply? Needs an actual answer to the incidents he posts though. Which you obviously don't have. Otherwise you would reply and refute what he posts.

My thoughts exactly. I was going to put that in my response but didn't. I did reply to some his stuff some time back, but not often enough though. Has he responded to this thread yet? Wonder if he'll admit that this was a racially motivated hate crime? What do you think? Was it racially motivated?

Why should he ?

[A Theist]

So, why don't you reply? Needs an actual answer to the incidents he posts though. Which you obviously don't have. Otherwise you would reply and refute what he posts.

Yup 'ab' the people who don't respond to the damned thread are bitter no nothings who have nothing to say  nor anything constructive to offer but will whine at those who do

see A I can be a douche too

---

Not only that, but the vast majority of those threads are Min's personal echo chamber. His post count is that way for a reason.

But nay, it's much easier to call everyone who doesn't overtly disagree with Min a SJW than refute the points he makes in the threads. Messes up one's reality to see it any other way.

Well yeah that would take effort and intelligence something A has in short supply

Again my  A Theist Douche impression

Yup, that's my impression of you too. Short on intelligence and long on Dumbassery.

Oro 'douchie' goofy, you do a fine impression of being quite the douche yourself.

[Napoléon]

Why should he ?

Why should we?

[A Theist]

What do you think? Was it racially motivated?

Didn't i make myself clear already? It was a hate crime. Wether it was racially motivated, against a disabled person or both is entirely irrelevant. It was a hate crime and it was despicable. There's nothing more to say.

Lol. I knew you wouldn't. Yeah, you made yourself clear enough alright.

[abaris]

Lol. I knew you wouldn't. Yeah, you made yourself clear enough alright.

So am I right in assuming the only hate crime you're willing to accept is a racially motivated one? Or do I read you wrong there? How about sexual orientation? How about mental or physical disabilities? How about religion?

[paulpablo]

Lol. I knew you wouldn't. Yeah, you made yourself clear enough alright.

So am I right in assuming the only hate crime you're willing to accept is a racially motivated one? Or do I read you wrong there? How about sexual orientation? How about mental or physical disabilities? How about religion?

I'm just observing the conversation but my guess is yes you're reading it wrong.

It was a pretty simple question of do you think the attack was racially motivated.

I didn't see any statements about hate crimes only being race related.

Seems illogical to me as to how you came to that conclusion.

The answer by the way is yes it was racially motivated.