Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: September 27, 2024, 11:17 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The fine tuning argument
#41
RE: The fine tuning argument
(September 24, 2010 at 5:06 pm)Rayaan Wrote: A naturalistic explanation would ultimately lead to something which doesn't require anymore explanation because that is the source of explanation for everything else. That's why God doesn't have to be so complex. He could be so simple that it's beyond our grasp to understand His true nature. The simplest thing could also be the greatest and the most mysterious thing you can ever imagine (or can't imagine).
Of course, the muslim ideology allows for god to explain everything without being an explaination himself. How very convenient.

(September 24, 2010 at 5:06 pm)Rayaan Wrote: We can't understand the mind of God. Maybe it can exist all by itself without needing a brain like we do.
And that, among other reasons, is a good reason for god to be unnecessary as an explaination for anything - as god is not such an explaination for anything. The entire concept has no predictive or empirical value to actually prove anything.

(September 24, 2010 at 5:06 pm)Rayaan Wrote: It's more than just feelings.
It's a combination of faith + reason + intuition - the evidence only.
That's nice, but only with evidence can you actually prove anything.

(September 24, 2010 at 5:06 pm)Rayaan Wrote: I don't know the answer to that, but it's possible that He gave the universe some kind of a self-organizational intelligence to ultimately sort out everything by itself to finally bring out the result which He had planned for. Yet again, maybe He could've done it the first time if He wanted to.
So... he created the universe but didn't necessarily need to have anything else to do with it and all the evidence in the universe can't get to the point of actually proving a creator. Even if such a being exists, then why bother with it anyway? Particularly when the naturalistic laws can bring about the same explailnation without the necessity of extra and unnecessary complexities, such as a supernatural and omnipotent intelligence.
If today you can take a thing like evolution and make it a crime to teach in the public schools, tomorrow you can make it a crime to teach it in the private schools and next year you can make it a crime to teach it to the hustings or in the church. At the next session you may ban books and the newspapers...
Ignorance and fanaticism are ever busy and need feeding. Always feeding and gloating for more. Today it is the public school teachers; tomorrow the private. The next day the preachers and the lecturers, the magazines, the books, the newspapers. After a while, Your Honor, it is the setting of man against man and creed against creed until with flying banners and beating drums we are marching backward to the glorious ages of the sixteenth centry when bigots lighted fagots to burn the men who dared to bring any intelligence and enlightenment and culture to the human mind. ~Clarence Darrow, at the Scopes Monkey Trial, 1925

Politics is supposed to be the second-oldest profession. I have come to realize that it bears a very close resemblance to the first. ~Ronald Reagan
Reply
#42
RE: The fine tuning argument
(September 24, 2010 at 5:06 pm)Rayaan Wrote: That's why God doesn't have to be so complex. He could be so simple that it's beyond our grasp to understand His true nature. The simplest thing could also be the greatest and the most mysterious thing you can ever imagine (or can't imagine).
Simple entities are normally the easiest to explain, by corollary, complex entities are usually more difficult to explain.


Quote:We can't understand the mind of God. Maybe it can exist all by itself without needing a brain like we do.
Its worth pointing out your blatant logical contradiction that we can't understand the mind of God, yet assert you can comprehend how complex it is. I can't understand everything about quantum mechanics, doesn't mean there isn't someone else out there who can.


Quote:It's more than just feelings.
It's a combination of faith + reason + intuition - the evidence only.
How you feel about reality has no bearing on what is actually demonstrable. For instance, regardless of how you feel about car crashes it doesn't change the fact there were over 6 million road accidents in the United States alone back in 2005, nor does it make them any less real.

http://www.car-accidents.com/

You need empirical evidence for god to silence your critics, not blind faith.


Quote:Not just a mind, but God is a law itself for the entire universe, a law for all the other laws of nature.
Then by all means, demonstrate how this entity/force governs the physical laws of the universe. Explain to us how it controls the laws of thermodynamics for example.


Quote:I don't know the answer to that, but it's possible that He gave the universe some kind of a self-organizational intelligence to ultimately sort out everything by itself to finally bring out the result which He had planned for. Yet again, maybe He could've done it the first time if He wanted to.
If you don't know the answer, that's fine, that would've been intellectually honest of you to leave it at that, but instead you rant on. So not only do you claim there's an infinite cosmic creator, but now you presuppose it also made the universe sentient? Why stop there? Why not further your groundless evidence-free claims by arguing that every atom in our body is self-aware and ensures we survive after biological death?


Quote:It's only that the universe if innefficient in certain ways. I don't know why He made it like that. However, God reveals His perfection in the universe by bringing order out of chaos. You'll notice that fine tuning has happened through different levels
You're speaking in present tense: When did it do that exactly? You can't coherently state the current universe is "inefficient" and then go on to say its all still "fine-tuned" anyway.
Reply
#43
RE: The fine tuning argument
So the basic problem is why are the laws the way they are.

I googled fine tuning it and the answers I recieved were the usual multiverse with random fluctuations etc.

Could it be that the laws HAVE to be this way for some reason? and that the possible fluctuations are incompatable with how reality works.

What I'm asking is what non-deistic mechanism can set the laws of nature?



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply
#44
RE: The fine tuning argument
Quote:There is no evidence of any design as such that couldn't be explained with empirical evidence for a naturalistic explaination.

Where is this evidence that explains away the need of a Designer?

Quote:That is an excellent question. It's still a very open question for physicists and astronomers around the world.
The religious answer, however, I can guarentee, is as good as any that I can make up right now.

What created the aliens?

Quote:Good. Now at least you admit that much. Now can we go further and admit that at the same time as we don't know "anything" about our universe we couldn't possibly know anything about something even more complex that shows no signs of even existing? eg god.

Such as Multiverses?

Note: Just because you cant understand, doesnt mean it exists...
Its ok to have doubt, just dont let that doubt become the answers.

You dont hate God, you hate the church game.

"God is not what you imagine or what you think you understand. If you understand you have failed." Saint Augustine

Your mind works very simply: you are either trying to find out what are God's laws in order to follow them; or you are trying to outsmart Him. -Martin H. Fischer
Reply
#45
RE: The fine tuning argument
(September 26, 2010 at 5:50 am)solja247 Wrote:
Quote:That is an excellent question. It's still a very open question for physicists and astronomers around the world.
The religious answer, however, I can guarentee, is as good as any that I can make up right now.

What created the aliens?

What created God?
"God is dead" - Friedrich Nietzsche

"Faith is what you have in things that DON'T exist. - Homer J. Simpson
Reply
#46
RE: The fine tuning argument
Quote:What created God?

Nothing, God is the uncaused cause. If there is no uncaused cause we can continue going around in circles, and going no where...
Its ok to have doubt, just dont let that doubt become the answers.

You dont hate God, you hate the church game.

"God is not what you imagine or what you think you understand. If you understand you have failed." Saint Augustine

Your mind works very simply: you are either trying to find out what are God's laws in order to follow them; or you are trying to outsmart Him. -Martin H. Fischer
Reply
#47
RE: The fine tuning argument
Why can't the universe be uncaused?
"God is dead" - Friedrich Nietzsche

"Faith is what you have in things that DON'T exist. - Homer J. Simpson
Reply
#48
RE: The fine tuning argument
Quote:Why can't the universe be uncaused?

Everything has a cause, we can try and say it doesnt but untill we have something which doesnt need a cause (other than God) Everything does have a cause, its not a theory, its a fact.
Its ok to have doubt, just dont let that doubt become the answers.

You dont hate God, you hate the church game.

"God is not what you imagine or what you think you understand. If you understand you have failed." Saint Augustine

Your mind works very simply: you are either trying to find out what are God's laws in order to follow them; or you are trying to outsmart Him. -Martin H. Fischer
Reply
#49
RE: The fine tuning argument
So what makes God exempt from this rule?

You can't make up shit about your god just because someone shoots a hole in your argument.
"God is dead" - Friedrich Nietzsche

"Faith is what you have in things that DON'T exist. - Homer J. Simpson
Reply
#50
RE: The fine tuning argument
Quote:So what makes God exempt from this rule?

Perhaps He isnt.
Something created God, something created God's creator, something created creator's creator, something created creator's creator, something created creator's creator, something created creator's creator, something created creator's creator...

You see how we dont get anywhere?

Either something created God and that God was created by another God and that God was created by another God OR there was an uncaused cause, which is God...
Its ok to have doubt, just dont let that doubt become the answers.

You dont hate God, you hate the church game.

"God is not what you imagine or what you think you understand. If you understand you have failed." Saint Augustine

Your mind works very simply: you are either trying to find out what are God's laws in order to follow them; or you are trying to outsmart Him. -Martin H. Fischer
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Fine Tuning Principle: Devastating Disproof and Scientific Refutation of Atheism. Nishant Xavier 97 9961 September 20, 2023 at 1:31 pm
Last Post: Silver
  Signature in the Cell: DNA as Evidence for Design, beside Nature's Laws/Fine-Tuning. Nishant Xavier 54 4053 July 8, 2023 at 8:23 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  The not-so-fine tuning argument. Jehanne 38 8325 March 10, 2016 at 9:11 am
Last Post: Jehanne
  Fine tuning of the multiverse? tor 8 1817 March 27, 2014 at 3:29 pm
Last Post: Alex K
  Fine tuning argument assessed max-greece 99 26114 March 10, 2014 at 10:35 pm
Last Post: Rampant.A.I.
  Fine Tuning Argument The_Flying_Skeptic 14 5657 September 2, 2010 at 5:52 pm
Last Post: Captain Scarlet



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)