Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 29, 2024, 5:59 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[4.1 SECOND Conversion] (without weird fonts too!)
#21
RE: [4.1 SECOND Conversion] (without weird fonts too!)
(January 15, 2017 at 10:27 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:
(January 15, 2017 at 3:19 am)ApeNotKillApe Wrote: Rassclaat!

Bomboclaat

----Boru's double signature is still silly

Yes, it is.

Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#22
RE: [4.1 SECOND Conversion] (without weird fonts too!)
(January 15, 2017 at 10:27 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: Boru's double signature is still silly

Sounds like a belief to me.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
#23
RE: [4.1 SECOND Conversion] (without weird fonts too!)
(January 15, 2017 at 11:02 am)Stimbo Wrote:
(January 15, 2017 at 10:27 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: Boru's double signature is still silly

Sounds like a belief to me.

It is observably redundant; 'Boru' is already contained in his/her signature.
Reply
#24
RE: [4.1 SECOND Conversion] (without weird fonts too!)
"Silly" is the belief in play, kiddo.

Reply
#25
RE: [4.1 SECOND Conversion] (without weird fonts too!)
(January 18, 2017 at 3:39 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:
(January 15, 2017 at 11:02 am)Stimbo Wrote: Sounds like a belief to me.

It is observably redundant; 'Boru' is already contained in his/her signature.

'If anyone could observe events with total/absolute accuracy, that person would probably get nobel prize.'

Whoopsy.

Get a bit of silliness in your life, Jordan.  Do you a world of good.  Smile

Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#26
RE: [4.1 SECOND Conversion] (without weird fonts too!)
(January 18, 2017 at 5:09 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(January 18, 2017 at 3:39 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: It is observably redundant; 'Boru' is already contained in his/her signature.

'If anyone could observe events with total/absolute accuracy, that person would probably get nobel prize.'

Whoopsy.  

Get a bit of silliness in your life, Jordan.  Do you a world of good.  Smile

Boru

Odd how someone who preaches the gospel of observation should have such an obvious blind spot.

Reply
#27
RE: [4.1 SECOND Conversion] (without weird fonts too!)
(January 18, 2017 at 5:09 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(January 18, 2017 at 3:39 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: It is observably redundant; 'Boru' is already contained in his/her signature.

'If anyone could observe events with total/absolute accuracy, that person would probably get nobel prize.'

Whoopsy.  

Get a bit of silliness in your life, Jordan.  Do you a world of good.  Smile

Boru

Would you care to explain the whoopsy?



Something to keep in mind:
Nowhere did I state that the observation of your redundant signature was of absolute nature.
As I prior stated, life appears to persist in the domain of probabilities.


Furthermore, recall that probabilities don't necessarily imply nonsense.

Probabilities are observed to give rise to life, and the sequences of particles of computers that comprise your post are demonstrably of probabilistic nature.
Reply
#28
RE: [4.1 SECOND Conversion] (without weird fonts too!)
Happy to. It indicates a conflict in your loopy worldview. You're constantly railing that nothing is perfectly observable, yet you claim that the silliness of my signature is observable.

You may now proceed with your nutty double talk in a futile effort to get yourself out of this predicament.

Boru the Silly
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#29
RE: [4.1 SECOND Conversion] (without weird fonts too!)
(January 18, 2017 at 6:49 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Happy to. It indicates a conflict in your loopy worldview. You're constantly railing that nothing is perfectly observable, yet you claim that the silliness of my signature is observable.

You may now proceed with your nutty double talk in a futile effort to get yourself out of this predicament.

Boru the Silly


So, it is as predicted.

Here is a meme that fits your behaviour:

[Image: B64mky1.jpg]

Simply, anyway, as I stated prior, I had not stated that your duplicate signature was absolutely silly, but instead, that it was silly.

You appeared to ignore my prior post, so here it is once more:



ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:Something to keep in mind:
NOWHERE DID I STATE THAT THE OBSERVATION OF YOUR REDUNDANT SIGNATURE WAS OF ABSOLUTE NATURE.

As I prior stated, life appears to persist in the domain of probabilities.



Furthermore, recall that probabilities don't necessarily imply nonsense.

Probabilities are observed to give rise to lifeand the sequences of particles of computers that comprise your post are demonstrably of probabilistic nature.
Reply
#30
RE: [4.1 SECOND Conversion] (without weird fonts too!)
I think I see. Your claim is not that my signature is absolutely silly but only probabilistically silly. But inherent in this claim, is that my signature has an equal chance of being probabilistically non-silly, as well as non-redundant and non-worthless.

Without resorting to multiple colors and a bewildering of font sizes, are you prepared to admit that your flat statements about my signature previously expressed are uncertain and silly ?

Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Is God hiding? or are our eyes too inferior? WinterHold 49 4931 February 10, 2023 at 9:30 pm
Last Post: Objectivist
  World without religion would just be replaced with Authoritartian socialism Katastroph2 17 1479 September 24, 2021 at 11:00 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  Covid-19 second wave WinterHold 58 6640 August 11, 2020 at 6:50 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Growing up, did your parents have weird rules because of religion GODZILLA 7 1134 November 15, 2018 at 1:34 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  A friendly religious discussion with theists without any fallacies! ignoramus 18 3147 May 14, 2018 at 5:07 pm
Last Post: GUBU
  Too Funny! Minimalist 14 2438 November 23, 2017 at 6:59 am
Last Post: ignoramus
  what believers accept without thinking Akat4891 17 6267 June 14, 2017 at 5:28 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  If God created all the good things around us then it means he created all EVIL too ErGingerbreadMandude 112 20453 March 3, 2017 at 9:53 am
Last Post: Harry Nevis
  [1 second conversion] Convert theist to atheist, in 1 second ProgrammingGodJordan 252 21986 February 17, 2017 at 1:10 am
Last Post: maestroanth
  Officially sold my "soul" for the second time. Foxaèr 2 1048 January 28, 2017 at 3:49 am
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)