Posts: 43730
Threads: 526
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: [4.1 SECOND Conversion] (without weird fonts too!)
January 15, 2017 at 10:29 am
(January 15, 2017 at 10:27 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: (January 15, 2017 at 3:19 am)ApeNotKillApe Wrote: Rassclaat!
Bomboclaat
----Boru's double signature is still silly
Yes, it is.
Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: [4.1 SECOND Conversion] (without weird fonts too!)
January 15, 2017 at 11:02 am
(January 15, 2017 at 10:27 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: Boru's double signature is still silly
Sounds like a belief to me.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 354
Threads: 9
Joined: November 1, 2016
Reputation:
1
RE: [4.1 SECOND Conversion] (without weird fonts too!)
January 18, 2017 at 3:39 am
(This post was last modified: January 18, 2017 at 3:39 am by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(January 15, 2017 at 11:02 am)Stimbo Wrote: (January 15, 2017 at 10:27 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: Boru's double signature is still silly
Sounds like a belief to me.
It is observably redundant; 'Boru' is already contained in his/her signature.
Posts: 21718
Threads: 24
Joined: February 2, 2010
Reputation:
106
RE: [4.1 SECOND Conversion] (without weird fonts too!)
January 18, 2017 at 5:07 am
"Silly" is the belief in play, kiddo.
Posts: 43730
Threads: 526
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: [4.1 SECOND Conversion] (without weird fonts too!)
January 18, 2017 at 5:09 am
(This post was last modified: January 18, 2017 at 5:12 am by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
(January 18, 2017 at 3:39 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: (January 15, 2017 at 11:02 am)Stimbo Wrote: Sounds like a belief to me.
It is observably redundant; 'Boru' is already contained in his/her signature.
'If anyone could observe events with total/absolute accuracy, that person would probably get nobel prize.'
Whoopsy.
Get a bit of silliness in your life, Jordan. Do you a world of good.
Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Posts: 21718
Threads: 24
Joined: February 2, 2010
Reputation:
106
RE: [4.1 SECOND Conversion] (without weird fonts too!)
January 18, 2017 at 5:23 am
(January 18, 2017 at 5:09 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: (January 18, 2017 at 3:39 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: It is observably redundant; 'Boru' is already contained in his/her signature.
'If anyone could observe events with total/absolute accuracy, that person would probably get nobel prize.'
Whoopsy.
Get a bit of silliness in your life, Jordan. Do you a world of good.
Boru
Odd how someone who preaches the gospel of observation should have such an obvious blind spot.
Posts: 354
Threads: 9
Joined: November 1, 2016
Reputation:
1
RE: [4.1 SECOND Conversion] (without weird fonts too!)
January 18, 2017 at 6:43 am
(This post was last modified: January 18, 2017 at 6:48 am by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(January 18, 2017 at 5:09 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: (January 18, 2017 at 3:39 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: It is observably redundant; 'Boru' is already contained in his/her signature.
'If anyone could observe events with total/absolute accuracy, that person would probably get nobel prize.'
Whoopsy.
Get a bit of silliness in your life, Jordan. Do you a world of good.
Boru
Would you care to explain the whoopsy?
Something to keep in mind:
Nowhere did I state that the observation of your redundant signature was of absolute nature.
As I prior stated, life appears to persist in the domain of probabilities.
Furthermore, recall that probabilities don't necessarily imply nonsense.
Probabilities are observed to give rise to life, and the sequences of particles of computers that comprise your post are demonstrably of probabilistic nature.
Posts: 43730
Threads: 526
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: [4.1 SECOND Conversion] (without weird fonts too!)
January 18, 2017 at 6:49 am
Happy to. It indicates a conflict in your loopy worldview. You're constantly railing that nothing is perfectly observable, yet you claim that the silliness of my signature is observable.
You may now proceed with your nutty double talk in a futile effort to get yourself out of this predicament.
Boru the Silly
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Posts: 354
Threads: 9
Joined: November 1, 2016
Reputation:
1
RE: [4.1 SECOND Conversion] (without weird fonts too!)
January 18, 2017 at 7:06 am
(This post was last modified: January 18, 2017 at 7:08 am by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(January 18, 2017 at 6:49 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Happy to. It indicates a conflict in your loopy worldview. You're constantly railing that nothing is perfectly observable, yet you claim that the silliness of my signature is observable.
You may now proceed with your nutty double talk in a futile effort to get yourself out of this predicament.
Boru the Silly
So, it is as predicted.
Here is a meme that fits your behaviour:
Simply, anyway, as I stated prior, I had not stated that your duplicate signature was absolutely silly, but instead, that it was silly.
You appeared to ignore my prior post, so here it is once more:
ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:Something to keep in mind:
NOWHERE DID I STATE THAT THE OBSERVATION OF YOUR REDUNDANT SIGNATURE WAS OF ABSOLUTE NATURE.
As I prior stated, life appears to persist in the domain of probabilities.
Furthermore, recall that probabilities don't necessarily imply nonsense.
Probabilities are observed to give rise to life, and the sequences of particles of computers that comprise your post are demonstrably of probabilistic nature.
Posts: 43730
Threads: 526
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: [4.1 SECOND Conversion] (without weird fonts too!)
January 18, 2017 at 9:24 am
I think I see. Your claim is not that my signature is absolutely silly but only probabilistically silly. But inherent in this claim, is that my signature has an equal chance of being probabilistically non-silly, as well as non-redundant and non-worthless.
Without resorting to multiple colors and a bewildering of font sizes, are you prepared to admit that your flat statements about my signature previously expressed are uncertain and silly ?
Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
|