Women's March - PDX Edition

[The Valkyrie]

"millions of women exercised and enjoyed their rights and freedoms by going on a march where they openly, freely and without recrimination, spoke loudly, and without censorship, about how they are oppressed, arent Free to do as they please, and dont have Rights."

^^ something funny I found

So, you're saying it's okay for a man to brag about sexually assaulting women so long as it's the guy you support.

Imagine the outrage in the cons if Obama had bragged about that...

[Amarok]

There clearly an error on this picture

After mature adults protested trump

Trump supporters are the ones who cheerlead a whiny man child who throws twitter hissy fits when people calling his  hands small or question the size of his inauguration or not calling him man of the year

So chug back the white stuff trumpers and pat yourselves on the back for electing a president the reflects you maturity level

---

"millions of women exercised and enjoyed their rights and freedoms by going on a march where they openly, freely and without recrimination, spoke loudly, and without censorship, about how they are oppressed, arent Free to do as they please, and dont have Rights."

^^ something funny I found

So, you're saying it's okay for a man to brag about sexually assaulting women so long as it's the guy you support.

Imagine the outrage in the cons if Obama had bragged about that...

Great pool logic if your not openly being assaulted or censored in a mass protest then your not oppressed at all. Well see in 2 years how protests are dealt with by the Trump regime considering he has yet to completely push his agenda

Face palm

[Clueless Morgan]

Or, how about this one? This is my favorite....

Considering that Trump just signed an executive order reinstating the Mexico City Policy (and expanding its scope) meaning that even organizations that mention abortion as an option will now lose US support, he's pretty well proven that the Women's March and those standing up for women's and reproductive rights was entirely justified.

And that was just his opening salvo.  We've potentially got 4 more years of attacks on women's health to look forward to.

So call me a baby all you want 'cause nobody puts baby in a corner.



---

Also, I heard after the fact that Lawrence Krauss was at the PDX march...

https://twitter.com/LKrauss1/status/822925155022225408

[Amarok]

Or, how about this one? This is my favorite....

Considering that Trump just signed an executive order reinstating the Mexico City Policy (and expanding its scope) meaning that even organizations that mention abortion as an option will now lose US support, he's pretty well proven that the Women's March and those standing up for women's and reproductive rights was entirely justified.

And that was just his opening salvo.  We've potentially got 4 more years of attacks on women's health to look forward to.

So call me a baby all you want 'cause nobody puts baby in a corner.



---

Also, I heard after the fact that Lawrence Krauss was at the PDX march...

https://twitter.com/LKrauss1/status/822925155022225408

Indeed I would rather be a baby then trumptard. After all babies are cute and actually need them to continue the human race.

[ErGingerbreadMandude]

But Trump said some mean things 20 years ago so it's cool

---

Didn't the woman's March have a woman that tortured, raped and killed a man? She was complaining about how everybody is out to get her because she got punished for killing a human being. Cool cool.

[The Valkyrie]

But Trump said some mean things 20 years ago so it's cool

---

Didn't the woman's March have a woman that tortured, raped and killed a man? She was complaining about how everybody is out to get her because she got punished for killing a human being. Cool cool.

You keep posting this stuff but you don't answer any of the statements put forward by others.

Why is that, pool?

And, as an aside, I just noticed my name, along with others, in your signature. What's that about?

[Amarok]

But Trump said some mean things 20 years ago so it's cool

---

Didn't the woman's March have a woman that tortured, raped and killed a man? She was complaining about how everybody is out to get her because she got punished for killing a human being. Cool cool.

1. 20 years ago? how about throughout his whole campaign and his comments were not "mean" there were overtly misogynistic

2. Swearing and  Misogyny are two different things idiot

3.What kids are watching  Cspan and were the hell there parents  supervising them

4. Citation needed for your last comment (expecting fake news sites)

[ErGingerbreadMandude]

Yep. Found it.


http://www.speroforum.com/a/ISRZGUKJVH49...IgMG1nhXqD

Her website states that she is a “women's rights activist and criminal justice reform advocate,”

“Spurling himself interviewed Donna: ‘I couldn't believe this girl who was so intelligent and nice-looking could be so unemotional about what she was telling me she and her friends had done. They'd squeezed the victim's testicles with a pair of pliers, beat him, burned him.

Hylton is heard to say, “Every person that represents an institution within this country is involved in the abuse that happened to me and so many other women. It doesn't matter black, brown, or white or whatever. A lot of the crimes that peopel are in prison for, especially women, are not crimes. They're situations."

Not only does she torture and kill a person but she also has no remorse. In her head by some twisted logic what she did was justified. Aaaand she's featured in the woman's March Cool cool.

---

And, as an aside, I just noticed my name, along with others, in your signature. What's that about?

Oh It's just people I like, if you don't like it I'll take it off though no probs.

[Amarok]

Once again you overtly simplfy things

1. so your objection is that an ex convict was allowed to speak at a rally as a woman on womens issues. (setting aside her crime for a moment) why shouldn't this be allowed ? How is this a approval of her crime?

2. As for lack of remorse where? the interview as i understand it was before her sentence . Do you have proof that she isn't remorseful now .IF your evidence is she hasn't apologized it's possible she doesn't wanna reflect on her crime she's had 27 years to do that .

3.As for her statement i don't agree but see her logic  .She believes society failed her .(via the fact she was sold and abused ) then jailed her because they failed her. Of course i don't agree with this . but it's her feelings on the matter .And depending on your opinion of justice she has a point.
 
Ultimatly thou she was tried and convicted and jailed so her crime is in the past. (and yes you can disagree with the punishment but neither you or me are the law). You have no proof she does regret her crime in the now.As for her speech you can disagree with her idea's about crime vs  situtions .(i totally diagree) And you can disagree with her on socities responsibilty in creating criminals (i do).But she's free and appears to have reformed .She's taken up a worthy cause . So how again does her presence change anything ?.

And yes before you start spouting yes if it were a  man id be making arguments i am now. I have worked with both for long time professionally when i worked in corrections

And how does any of this excuse Donald Trump again?

[pocaracas]