Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: 23rd November 2017, 05:32

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
#1
Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
A Christian friend of mine has set me a challenge –

He says I need a scientific reason for being moral and for living by the secular humanism philosophy. He believes I must have no reason other than a scientific one because I use science to rationalize my claims about the existence of any deities.

I’m not sure how to answer this because I haven’t yet explored it properly. I’m not entirely sure if there really does have to be a scientific reason... I mean... I guess so. But how would I go about answering this?
On spot, I said my scientific reason is because it works... and it’s been proven. Because helping others works for the benefit of my own race and has proved equally beneficial for myself.

He didn’t seem to think that was valid... he didn’t even give me a reason why. Of course, I’m not simply thinking my argument isn’t valid...
I would like to be able to build a better argument...
Perspective goes a long way to finding some acceptance.

When I say I don't need salvation, I'm saying I don't need a sky daddy to forgive me for being born.

"We need not a God; just another human being to give life a meaning. For people are truly all people have" author unknown

Reply
#2
RE: Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
Quote:He says I need a scientific reason for being moral and for living by the secular humanism philosophy.

No, you don't.

Your friend is an ignoramus,I really wouldn't bother Be.like trying to communicate with an Orangutang. However,if you must:

Refer him to the notion of ETHICS, aka moral philosophy,based on reason,not science..,


Quote:Ethics (also known as moral philosophy) is a branch of philosophy that addresses questions about morality — that is, concepts such as good and evil, right and wrong, justice, virtue, etc.
Major branches of ethics include:
Meta-ethics, about the theoretical meaning and reference of moral propositions and how their truth-values (if any) may be determined;
Normative ethics, about the practical means of determining a moral course of action;
Applied ethics, about how moral outcomes can be achieved in specific situations;
Moral psychology, about how moral capacity or moral agency develops and what its nature is; and
Descriptive ethics, about what moral values people actually abide by.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_philosophy

Man is not so much a rational animal as a rationalising one.
Reply
#3
RE: Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
Scientific answer.


Quote:Many that live deserve death. Some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them, Frodo? Do not be too eager to deal out death in judgment. Even the very wise cannot see all ends.

Gandalf The Gray.
Reply
#4
RE: Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
@Padriac- So reason alone is indicative without scientifc evidence? I think the point was to defend his lack of scientific evidence of the existance of God.

In the video it says... "Where ever else it comes from it's not from scripture" when if some use scripture to better their own personal morality. Those individuals are then part of society which shapes societal morality. Societal Morality is at least partially based on the Bible (or at the very least people who use the Bible). His contention is that any influence from the Bible would be counter productive to furthering altruis, but one of the key proponents of Biblical teachings are to love thy neighbor as you would want to be loved. Seems to be an inaccurate and unfounded statement.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post

"A lot of people are unwilling to acknowledge anything that contradicts their worldview. So telling them that it's false doesn't necessarily slow them down. That's how urban legends get started for the most case. Like the woman who supposedly put her poodle in the microwave to dry it off. And it exploded." David Mikkelson (snopes)
Reply
#5
RE: Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
(21st September 2010, 00:08)Scott Richens Wrote: A Christian friend of mine has set me a challenge –

He says I need a scientific reason for being moral and for living by the secular humanism philosophy. He believes I must have no reason other than a scientific one because I use science to rationalize my claims about the existence of any deities.

I’m not sure how to answer this because I haven’t yet explored it properly. I’m not entirely sure if there really does have to be a scientific reason... I mean... I guess so. But how would I go about answering this?
On spot, I said my scientific reason is because it works... and it’s been proven. Because helping others works for the benefit of my own race and has proved equally beneficial for myself.

He didn’t seem to think that was valid... he didn’t even give me a reason why. Of course, I’m not simply thinking my argument isn’t valid... I think the problem is mainly him... he doesn’t want to hear it and just blocks it out. He wants to have me stumped. I would like to be able to build a better argument...

Scientific answer

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_evolution



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply
#6
RE: Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
(21st September 2010, 12:37)tackattack Wrote: @Padriac- So reason alone is indicative without scientifc evidence? I think the point was to defend his lack of scientific evidence of the existance of God.

In the video it says... "Where ever else it comes from it's not from scripture" when if some use scripture to better their own personal morality. Those individuals are then part of society which shapes societal morality. Societal Morality is at least partially based on the Bible (or at the very least people who use the Bible). His contention is that any influence from the Bible would be counter productive to furthering altruis, but one of the key proponents of Biblical teachings are to love thy neighbor as you would want to be loved. Seems to be an inaccurate and unfounded statement.

The moss copied 7 commandments from the Egyptian book of the dead
Reply
#7
RE: Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
(21st September 2010, 00:08)Scott Richens Wrote: A Christian friend of mine has set me a challenge –

He says I need a scientific reason for being moral and for living by the secular humanism philosophy. He believes I must have no reason other than a scientific one because I use science to rationalize my claims about the existence of any deities.

He didn’t seem to think that was valid... he didn’t even give me a reason why. Of course, I’m not simply thinking my argument isn’t valid... I think the problem is mainly him... he doesn’t want to hear it and just blocks it out. He wants to have me stumped. I would like to be able to build a better argument...

It's pretty simple how to answer this- firstly your friend (although why you want to be friends with a person like that is beyond me) needs to be reminded that you don't have to explain or justify your position. Your views are based on logic and common sense, and common sense has been around far longer than the idea of gods, christianity or supposed morality. A neanderthal understood that if he stuck a spear in his friend, his friend would die, therefore he wouldn't do it. That is common sense.

Christians love to claim a monopoly on morality, but they have no basis for this whatsoever.

Furthermore, after many attempts myself, I would no longer bother trying to deconvert a christian. Because frankly this planet was ours long before it was taken over by the sheep and their god of delusions; it's christianity that is the new kid on the block, not atheists, and the way it swaggers about proclaiming hither and dither is well deserving of an ass kicking.

Devil
[Image: cassandrasaid.jpg]
Reply
#8
RE: Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
Who needs a scientific answer when you have George Carlin?





“Society is not a disease, it is a disaster. What a stupid miracle that one can live in it.” ~ E.M. Cioran
Reply
#9
RE: Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
Ashendant.. back up your claim with specifics.. I count maybe 3 at a stretch.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post

"A lot of people are unwilling to acknowledge anything that contradicts their worldview. So telling them that it's false doesn't necessarily slow them down. That's how urban legends get started for the most case. Like the woman who supposedly put her poodle in the microwave to dry it off. And it exploded." David Mikkelson (snopes)
Reply
#10
RE: Challenge - Scientific reason for being moral.
(21st September 2010, 15:34)tackattack Wrote: Ashendant.. back up your claim with specifics.. I count maybe 3 at a stretch.

He's right, I already brought this up recently ..

http://atheistforums.org/thread-4684.html
[Image: cassandrasaid.jpg]
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  a challenge All atheists There is inevitably a Creator. Logic says that suni_muslim 64 814 Yesterday, 02:59
Last Post: Wololo
  Being An Atheist Doesn't Make You A Good Person mlmooney89 38 1057 7th September 2017, 10:29
Last Post: drfuzzy
  The Nice Thing About Being An Atheist JackRussell 83 3426 21st July 2017, 13:33
Last Post: KevinM1
  Creationist Moral Panic Tizheruk 15 1126 13th June 2017, 10:42
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  Are there any scientific books or studies that explain what makes a person religious? WisdomOfTheTrees 13 652 9th February 2017, 02:33
Last Post: Mirek-Polska
  Is atheism a scientific perspective? AAA 358 10767 27th January 2017, 19:49
Last Post: mh.brewer
  Being atheist in the Bible Belt MyelinSheath 37 1790 23rd January 2017, 05:01
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  A challenge for any Atheist who been here for a long time! MysticKnight 36 1656 11th January 2017, 20:16
Last Post: comet
  A challenge! MysticKnight 87 3129 10th January 2017, 01:43
Last Post: Astonished
  A challenge! MysticKnight 3 306 3rd January 2017, 00:27
Last Post: Cyberman



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)