*eyeroll* We protect the president and his family. Donald Trump has a little more than twice the immediate family member of Barack Obama and his costs are....shocking, a little more than twice as much. So basically it's the same expense as with Obama.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 2, 2025, 1:40 am
Thread Rating:
Why Are We Protecting This Fuck In The First Place?
|
See, this is the kind of nonsense that makes the left look stupid.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
(May 9, 2017 at 10:03 am)Divinity Wrote: I get why we're protecting him. But why protect his ADULT children? I don't think they should receive taxpayer funded security. Let them fund their own damn security if they want it. Protect Barron Trump, fine. He's a kid. We protect the adult children of presidents for the same reason we protect their spouses. They're very useful tools if bad people get ahold of them. Would you want a president making choices concerning national security if their 25-year-old kid were being held by foreign powers?
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
(May 9, 2017 at 4:17 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: We protect the adult children of presidents for the same reason we protect their spouses. They're very useful tools if bad people get ahold of them. Would you want a president making choices concerning national security if their 25-year-old kid were being held by foreign powers? A President has to be able to make those choices. They make those choices every fucking day when other people's children's lives are at stake (often minors, not adults). If they can't do it--then they're not fit to be President. And it still doesn't explain why the fuck we still protect past Presidents. They can afford their own damn security. (Just as the adult children of Presidents can afford their own) (May 9, 2017 at 4:16 pm)Alex K Wrote: See, this is the kind of nonsense that makes the left look stupid. ^^^ Not to mention that as much as the expense sounds, it's not much more than a rounding error compared to the national budget. I dislike the man as much as the next person and fully support holding him accountable, but this is just silly. (May 9, 2017 at 4:17 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote:(May 9, 2017 at 10:03 am)Divinity Wrote: I get why we're protecting him. But why protect his ADULT children? I don't think they should receive taxpayer funded security. Let them fund their own damn security if they want it. Protect Barron Trump, fine. He's a kid. But why protect them, then, in the case when the bad people already got their hooks into them before Drumpfuck was elected?
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home RE: Why Are We Protecting This Fuck In The First Place?
May 9, 2017 at 7:09 pm
(This post was last modified: May 9, 2017 at 7:10 pm by Ravenshire.)
(May 9, 2017 at 4:26 pm)Divinity Wrote:(May 9, 2017 at 4:17 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: We protect the adult children of presidents for the same reason we protect their spouses. They're very useful tools if bad people get ahold of them. Would you want a president making choices concerning national security if their 25-year-old kid were being held by foreign powers? Do you really think anyone is going to be as cold and calculating when their family is on the line as when faceless it's faceless strangers? (May 9, 2017 at 5:37 pm)Tazzycorn Wrote:(May 9, 2017 at 4:17 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: We protect the adult children of presidents for the same reason we protect their spouses. They're very useful tools if bad people get ahold of them. Would you want a president making choices concerning national security if their 25-year-old kid were being held by foreign powers? So, we should only offer protection to presidential families on a case by case basis? Who gets to decide which are worthy and which aren't?
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
(May 8, 2017 at 9:39 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: To him, it's just travel and holiday at the expense of the taxpayer. No. To him, it is what he expects. When he was a rich business man, do you think he actually paid for his golfing or do you think his businesses paid for it?
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter (May 9, 2017 at 7:09 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: So, we should only offer protection to presidential families on a case by case basis? Who gets to decide which are worthy and which aren't? More a case of you shouldn't be letting it up to a traitor's cronies to decide if he retains the most powerful seat in the land. Oh, and in the case of Drumpfuck, surely his family are rich enough to afford their own protection? I know he's lied every single other time he's talked in his life, but surely as a rich and powerful man we can trust Drumpfuck to tell the truth when he tells us he's not broke, bigly.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home (May 9, 2017 at 9:29 am)Tiberius Wrote: Why are we protecting him? Because for better or worse he's the President. I don't agree with much of what he says or does but I respect the office he holds enough to think that whomever holds it should be protected. Quote:the total for Trump's first 100 days was at least $30 million. By comparison, the conservative think tank Judicial Watch found that costs for President Barack Obama and his much smaller family averaged $12 million a year. $74 million is a metric fuckton of money.... for a country which always claims it is broke....until it is time to cut taxes on billionaires! |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)