Member Photos

[Jackalope]

Apparently, he gave himself a vasectomy.

[popeyespappy]

Apparently, he gave himself a vasectomy.

I guess it's a good thing he didn't post in the castration thread.

[Annik]

LOL

There was some conversation a member wanted removed and it got removed by Tibbers, I guess. Or he got circumcised.

[Shell B]

But staff doesn't remove posts. Hmmm. He probably wrote something he didn't mean to write.

[Annik]

[Removed at member's request]

Supports my hypothesis.

[Gilgamesh]

But staff doesn't remove posts. Hmmm. He probably wrote something he didn't mean to write.

He said you're ugly.

[Shell B]

[Removed at member's request]

Supports my hypothesis.

Not really. That is a Germans post. It could mean anything.

Anyway, if that is the case, the staff has started a whole new habit, as 1. It has always been a policy that it's your problem if you post something stupid. The reason being that we shouldn't have a ton of idiotic posts like: "Removed at user's request" all over the forum. 2. Why would Tibbers quote it and then "snip" it, if he can just delete his post entirely without leaving that?

ETA: It was a photo, I see. Much different from a conversation. That explains it. I even upvoted the photo, so I remember what it was, and there was clearly some issue with it being in the forum. Both Germans and Tibbers must have made some comment about it and now it's gone. Little do they know, I take screenshots of everything!! Mwahaha. (How creepy would that be?)

---

He said you're ugly.

Yeah . . . I'm not 12 and you're not that funny. Lifting and an insane obsession with what people look like. Well, at least you're a two-trick pony.

[Annik]

Not really. That is a Germans post. It could mean anything.

Anyway, if that is the case, the staff has started a whole new habit, as 1. It has always been a policy that it's your problem if you post something stupid. The reason being that we shouldn't have a ton of idiotic posts like: "Removed at user's request" all over the forum. 2. Why would Tibbers quote it and then "snip" it, if he can just delete his post entirely without leaving that?

Well, I actually know why these posts were removed as they were removed at a member's request. The post was regarding a third party and could potentially harm the third party, so snippity-snip!

[Gilgamesh]

Yeah . . . I'm not 12 and you're not that funny. Lifting and an insane obsession with what people look like. Well, at least you're a two-trick pony.

Do I sense rustled jimmies?

[Jackalope]

ETA: It was a photo, I see. Much different from a conversation. That explains it. I even upvoted the photo, so I remember what it was, and there was clearly some issue with it being in the forum.

I'm the one who edited German's post (at his request). Tiberius did his own dirty work.

Generally, we don't do this. In this case an exception was made because personal information about a third party in the photos in question was posted.