Posts: 19881
Threads: 324
Joined: July 31, 2016
Reputation:
34
RE: Stupidiest Anti Science Statement I Have Encountered
May 20, 2017 at 11:27 am
One of my relatives uses Mary as proof that he doesn't need to wear a condom.
Posts: 30994
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: Stupidiest Anti Science Statement I Have Encountered
May 20, 2017 at 4:15 pm
The egg question is beyond stupid. By analogy, water is essential for human life. Too little, and you will die. Despite being essential, too much and you will also die.
Eggs contain nutrients essential to human life. Yes they have a fair amount of fat, but fat is necessary - in moderation. This is true of all foods containing fats.
The question, as asked, lacks sufficient nuance and is IMHO incoherent. There's just some people who prefer easy, binary answers.
Posts: 30129
Threads: 304
Joined: April 18, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: Stupidiest Anti Science Statement I Have Encountered
May 20, 2017 at 5:11 pm
There are 2 kinds of people, those who prefer easy binary answers and those whom don't . . .
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
Posts: 13901
Threads: 263
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: Stupidiest Anti Science Statement I Have Encountered
May 21, 2017 at 3:38 am
(May 20, 2017 at 5:26 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: (May 20, 2017 at 5:11 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: There are 2 kinds of people, those who prefer easy binary answers and those whom don't . . .
I realize you're joking, but I bet pretty much everyone likes easy binary answers to at least some questions. ("Is there botulotoxin in my latte?" or "Is the person at the door here to kill me?")
Actually its. "There are 10 kinds people, those who understand binary and those who don't."
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.