Cash for vasectomy....

[Autumnlicious]

[Existentialist]

Carbunkle sweep butter in oppositional gurkens. Yaya~! I can redefine things too!

I think the difference is that I talk in English, whereas you just talk shit.

[Anomalocaris]

This is in answer to everyone from Post #55 of this thread onwards as I haven't had many chances to answer posts in the last couple of days. Sorry to batch you all up like this - let me know if I've missed you out!

Can you address my post #69 or is de-Nazification more important?

[Existentialist]

Can you address my post #69 or is de-Nazification more important?

Since Post #69 is the same argument that was used in the 1930s/1940s for disabled people, Jews and bisexual men, I think de-nazification is probably more important.

[Anomalocaris]

Can you address my post #69 or is de-Nazification more important?

Since Post #69 is the same argument that was used in the 1930s/1940s for disabled people, Jews and bisexual men, I think de-nazification is probably more important.

So as long as an argument has been used dishonestly by the Nazis for one thing, it could not be used honestly for another ever again?

It seems you will always be fleeing from specters of Nazi arguments rather than building from ground up good arguments of your own.

[Autumnlicious]

I think the difference is that I talk in English, whereas you just talk shit.

Really? See below:

And I respect your right to hold this belief. However, I believe in the freedom of people to express their views in their own words. It's not as if either of us can ethically impose our beliefs on the other, is it?

I do believe that is the sound of you eating your own words.

[Existentialist]

I do believe that is the sound of you eating your own words.

How exactly? I totally support your right to talk shit.

---

So as long as an argument has been used dishonestly by the Nazis for one thing, it could not be used honestly for another ever again?

Just one alteration. So as long as a nazi argument has been used dishonestly by the Nazis for one thing, it could not be used honestly for another ever again.

It seems you will always be fleeing from specters of Nazi arguments rather than building from ground up good arguments of your own.

You embrace them, I flee from them. Whose is the better judgement?

[Tiberius]

Eugenics is not a Nazi argument.

[Anomalocaris]

You embrace them, I flee from them. Whose is the better judgement?

I embrace my own arguments. I don't care about the Nazis and its beneath my notice if some of my arguments, which I reasoned out, happen to have been used by some Nazi somewhere. That fact does not add to or subtract from the native strength of my own argument.

My judgement is my own and stand on the merit of my own reason. Yours is just an unthinking reflex bound up with whatever policies the Nazis happened to have implemented. So who really has judgement and who doesn't?

[Existentialist]

Eugenics is not a Nazi argument.

Tell that to six million Jews