Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 30, 2024, 8:10 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Testimony is Evidence
RE: Testimony is Evidence
(August 29, 2017 at 10:01 am)Astonished Wrote:
(August 29, 2017 at 9:59 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: No, it isn't. What they've seen is the event itself. Evidence is that information which would bring a third person to a conclusion about what had happened in the event, even though the third person wasn't there.

What they've seen and what they believe happened and how they recall it happening in their mind, are three entirely different things.

Of course. That's the point of this discussion, when you boil it down.

Reply
RE: Testimony is Evidence
(August 29, 2017 at 10:16 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:
(August 29, 2017 at 10:01 am)Astonished Wrote: What they've seen and what they believe happened and how they recall it happening in their mind, are three entirely different things.

Of course. That's the point of this discussion, when you boil it down.

So why can't that sink into any of the minds of any of the proponents of testimony?
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?

---

There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
Reply
RE: Testimony is Evidence
(August 29, 2017 at 9:59 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:
(August 29, 2017 at 8:49 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote: [...] The evidence is what they had seen [...]

No, it isn't. What they've seen is the event itself. Evidence is that information which would bring a third person to a conclusion about what had happened in the event, even though the third person wasn't there.

What they seen of the event, is not information in which to base a conclusion?  Does a person need to see the evidence for themselves, in order for it to be evidence?
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man.  - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire.  - Martin Luther
Reply
RE: Testimony is Evidence
(August 29, 2017 at 10:17 am)Astonished Wrote:
(August 29, 2017 at 10:16 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Of course. That's the point of this discussion, when you boil it down.

So why can't that sink into any of the minds of any of the proponents of testimony?

[Image: db2beb1615d907748637770057da1b88.gif]

Reply
RE: Testimony is Evidence
(August 29, 2017 at 10:19 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote:
(August 29, 2017 at 9:59 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: No, it isn't. What they've seen is the event itself. Evidence is that information which would bring a third person to a conclusion about what had happened in the event, even though the third person wasn't there.

What they seen of the event, is not information in which to base a conclusion?  Does a person need to see the evidence for themselves, in order for it to be evidence?

How do you manage to ignore every relevant point? How? HOW?!!!!!!!
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?

---

There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
Reply
RE: Testimony is Evidence
(August 29, 2017 at 10:19 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote: What they seen of the event, is not information in which to base a conclusion?  Does a person need to see the evidence for themselves, in order for it to be evidence?

You missed my point. The event is not the evidence. The event is the occurrence. If you're going to engage in discussion, it pays to use words in accordance with their definitions.

As for your second question, I've already mentioned in this thread that I think testimony may be evidence in some situations. If a person comes to a conclusion in the absence of evidence -- such as you or NS with regards to your faith -- that's your business. If you want to convince me of something, bring me evidence.

Reply
RE: Testimony is Evidence
Fucking hell  how does this guy function ?

[Image: banging-head-on-desk.gif] 
[Image: banging-head-on-desk.gif]
[Image: banging-head-on-desk.gif]
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.

Inuit Proverb

Reply
RE: Testimony is Evidence
(August 29, 2017 at 10:22 am)Astonished Wrote:
(August 29, 2017 at 10:19 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote: What they seen of the event, is not information in which to base a conclusion?  Does a person need to see the evidence for themselves, in order for it to be evidence?

How do you manage to ignore every relevant point? How? HOW?!!!!!!!

practice.

He will take us down this inane rabbit hole for as long as we're willing to go along.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”

Wiser words were never spoken. 
Reply
RE: Testimony is Evidence
(August 29, 2017 at 10:31 am)Tizheruk Wrote: Fucking hell  how does this guy function ?

[Image: banging-head-on-desk.gif] 
[Image: banging-head-on-desk.gif]
[Image: banging-head-on-desk.gif]

Dude, don't do that. I thought you were Shit-Eating Doofus Rik invading this thread too.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?

---

There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
Reply
RE: Testimony is Evidence
(August 29, 2017 at 11:01 am)Astonished Wrote:
(August 29, 2017 at 10:31 am)Tizheruk Wrote: Fucking hell  how does this guy function ?

[Image: banging-head-on-desk.gif] 
[Image: banging-head-on-desk.gif]
[Image: banging-head-on-desk.gif]

Dude, don't do that. I thought you were Shit-Eating Doofus Rik invading this thread too.
Rik does not own that emoji. And we have every right to use it .
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.

Inuit Proverb

Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
Video Neurosurgeon Provides Evidence Against Materialism Guard of Guardians 41 6058 June 17, 2019 at 10:40 pm
Last Post: vulcanlogician
  The Philosophy of Mind: Zombies, "radical emergence" and evidence of non-experiential Edwardo Piet 82 15111 April 29, 2018 at 1:57 am
Last Post: bennyboy
  Testimony: Are we being hypocritical? LadyForCamus 86 11506 November 22, 2017 at 11:37 pm
Last Post: Martian Mermaid
  Is the statement "Claims demand evidence" always true? Mudhammam 268 42151 February 3, 2017 at 6:44 pm
Last Post: WisdomOfTheTrees
  Anecdotal Evidence RoadRunner79 395 66842 December 14, 2016 at 2:53 pm
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  What philosophical evidence is there against believing in non-physical entities? joseph_ 150 15730 September 3, 2016 at 11:26 am
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  The nature of evidence Wryetui 150 19227 May 6, 2016 at 6:21 am
Last Post: ignoramus
  Witness Evidence RoadRunner79 248 43306 December 17, 2015 at 7:23 pm
Last Post: bennyboy
  Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence RoadRunner79 184 35271 November 13, 2015 at 12:17 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Miracles are useless as evidence Pizza 0 1303 March 15, 2015 at 7:37 pm
Last Post: Pizza



Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)