Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 27, 2024, 4:23 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
More Race Hysteria from SJW's
RE: More Race Hysteria from SJW's
(October 9, 2017 at 6:22 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:
(October 9, 2017 at 3:00 pm)Hammy Wrote: Also right-wingers are generally racist. If you believe in equality and liberty you will be left-wing or at least political center and if you don't believe in those things you'll be bigoted. Right-wing political views are the perfect views for the racist and bigot to identify with.

A gross oversimplification.

Well I did say "generally".
Reply
RE: More Race Hysteria from SJW's
Quote:No. Policy that would only benefit either far left California or New York.
Pure ignorance and lies .

Quote:So, let me see if I understand your argument-  A student perhaps overreacted to a shoelace she mistook for a noose, therefore racism doesn't exist?

For someone who prides himself on impeccable logic, I would have thought you'd know what non-sequitur is.
And if one factors in all the racial tension in the states right now . The student is not totally unreasonable even if they were wrong . Like the Banana incident Wooters shows his ignorance and his blindness .

Quote:"If you keep pointing out that I'm a racist dems will lose elections!"
Better the Dems lose then bigotry wins .

Quote:I do think that one way that racism can show up, is by projecting racism on to others or almost automatically thinking that someone is racist, because of their ethnicity.
Cries of reverse racism and white victim hood  Dodgy
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.

Inuit Proverb

Reply
RE: More Race Hysteria from SJW's
(October 9, 2017 at 7:23 pm)Hammy Wrote:
(October 9, 2017 at 6:22 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: A gross oversimplification.

Well I did say "generally".

Of course, but that doesn't really save the thought from the criticism.

Reply
RE: More Race Hysteria from SJW's
(October 9, 2017 at 6:22 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:


(October 9, 2017 at 5:09 pm)A Theist Wrote: Too bad. That's the way it is in this country. At least with the electoral college the states with the biggest population won't be dictating policy for the rest of the country.[/hide]

What do you think the size of HoR delegations from each state is based on?

That's right -- population.
...and the Senate?
"Inside every Liberal there's a Totalitarian screaming to get out"

[Image: freddy_03.jpg]

Quote: JohnDG...
Quote:It was an awful mistake to characterize based upon religion. I should not judge any theist that way, I must remember what I said in order to change.
Reply
RE: More Race Hysteria from SJW's
(October 9, 2017 at 1:00 pm)Bob Kelso Wrote:
(October 9, 2017 at 12:43 pm)Hammy Wrote: His motives are what are questionable.

I haven't dealt with Wooters in a while, and even when I did I can't say I ever saw him being explicitly racist. That said I've been gone a while and a few of you have far more experience with his posts than I do, so maybe I'm giving him too much benefit of the doubt.

The OP just looked like (snarky) criticism of the regressive left's tendency to overblow literally everything and in turn unintentionally downplay actual racism to me.

That's exactly what it is and its a tactic that works on stupid people. The daily mail used a similar tactic to poison the EU in peoples minds and it worked making the UK forecer a lesser country.

I see a tendency for people on the right to call for people to stop pointing things out to them.
Stop calling me a racist when I say or do racist things. They say.
Do not call me a Nazi just because I'm goose stepping down the road holding a torch in a parade that features swastikas. They demand.
They want their bigotry, but by science they don't like to be called on it.



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply
RE: More Race Hysteria from SJW's
(October 10, 2017 at 1:37 am)A Theist Wrote:
(October 9, 2017 at 6:22 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:



What do you think the size of HoR delegations from each state is based on?

That's right -- population.
...and the Senate?

Obviously not based on population. But the HoR is, and that renders your concern nugatory. Laws are already subject to the large HoR delegations of populous states.

You had written, "At least with the electoral college the states with the biggest population won't be dictating policy for the rest of the country", but the EC (which determines the Presidential voting) and the HoR are apportioned by population. That means two out of the three elements are in fact subject to the control of states with high populations.

Reply
RE: More Race Hysteria from SJW's
(October 10, 2017 at 8:31 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:
(October 10, 2017 at 1:37 am)A Theist Wrote: ...and the Senate?

Obviously not based on population. But the HoR is, and that renders your concern nugatory. Laws are already subject to the large HoR delegations of populous states.

You had written, "At least with the electoral college the states with the biggest population won't be dictating policy for the rest of the country", but the EC (which determines the Presidential voting) and the HoR are apportioned by population. That means two out of the three elements are in fact subject to the control of states with high populations.
Their stuff still goes through the Senate.
"Inside every Liberal there's a Totalitarian screaming to get out"

[Image: freddy_03.jpg]

Quote: JohnDG...
Quote:It was an awful mistake to characterize based upon religion. I should not judge any theist that way, I must remember what I said in order to change.
Reply
RE: More Race Hysteria from SJW's
(October 10, 2017 at 8:43 am)A Theist Wrote:
(October 10, 2017 at 8:31 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Obviously not based on population. But the HoR is, and that renders your concern nugatory. Laws are already subject to the large HoR delegations of populous states.

You had written, "At least with the electoral college the states with the biggest population won't be dictating policy for the rest of the country", but the EC (which determines the Presidential voting) and the HoR are apportioned by population. That means two out of the three elements are in fact subject to the control of states with high populations.
Their stuff still goes through the Senate.

Of course. And that still doesn't negate my point, that the EC does nothing at all to minimize the influence of the heavily populated states, contrary to your assertion.

Reply
RE: More Race Hysteria from SJW's
(October 10, 2017 at 8:31 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:
(October 10, 2017 at 1:37 am)A Theist Wrote: ...and the Senate?

Obviously not based on population. But the HoR is, and that renders your concern nugatory. Laws are already subject to the large HoR delegations of populous states.

You had written, "At least with the electoral college the states with the biggest population won't be dictating policy for the rest of the country", but the EC (which determines the Presidential voting) and the HoR are apportioned by population. That means two out of the three elements are in fact subject to the control of states with high populations.

No, a state's electors in the EC are based on its number of representatives plus senators, so it's skewed in favor of smaller states.

https://www.archives.gov/federal-registe...about.html

Quote:Your state’s entitled allotment of electors equals the number of members in its Congressional delegation: one for each member in the House of Representatives plus two for your Senators.
Reply
RE: More Race Hysteria from SJW's
I'm so sick and fucking tired of these stupid conservatives bitching and moaning about EVERY GOD DAMN THING ON THE PLANET.

"Oh no, these people are crying out about something I disagree with! That means they're all wrong all the time and we shouldn't listen to them!"

Meanwhile...

"STARBUCKS HAS A RED CUP!? NOT SAYING MERRY CHRISTMAS!? WAR ON CHRISTMAS! WAR ON RELIGION! WAR ON RELIGION!"

So get the fuck out of here with this shit, you dumb fuck.
"Tradition" is just a word people use to make themselves feel better about being an asshole.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Current Head of WHO plays the "Race Card." Can you guess if he's black looking? Duty 9 1042 April 14, 2022 at 5:04 pm
Last Post: HappySkeptic
  Liam Neeson: Rape, Revenge, and Race Relations Rev. Rye 233 23212 February 21, 2019 at 4:10 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Vote Rigging Discovered In Canadian Tory Leadership Race Amarok 0 587 March 17, 2017 at 7:07 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  Obviously the Republicans need even more idiots - Donald Trump enters the race abaris 17 3802 June 19, 2015 at 4:25 pm
Last Post: ReptilianPeon



Users browsing this thread: 12 Guest(s)