Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 27, 2024, 12:47 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Travis Walton versus The Resurrection.
#21
RE: Travis Walton versus The Resurrection.
(November 13, 2017 at 9:31 am)Jehanne Wrote: My point with the OP is that with people like Mr. Watson and their stories, there is no reason to believe anything from the New Testament in the way of the "miraculous".  Faith is inconsistent, which is why it is irrational.

And I've given differences between his testimony and that from the NT.
Reply
#22
RE: Travis Walton versus The Resurrection.
(November 13, 2017 at 7:15 am)alpha male Wrote: For one thing, Paul suffered greatly for his testimony and stuck to it. Who's to say Travis would keep it up if he suffered like Paul?

Evidence?  Or do we have to suffer through more "church tradition?"
Reply
#23
RE: Travis Walton versus The Resurrection.
(November 11, 2017 at 1:44 pm)Jehanne Wrote: First, some background (from Wikipedia):

Quote:The Travis Walton UFO incident was an alleged abduction of an American logger by a UFO on November 5, 1975, while working with a logging crew in the Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest in Arizona. Walton reappeared after a five-day search. The Walton case received mainstream publicity and remains one of the best-known alien abduction stories. Skeptics consider it a hoax.[1][2][3][4][5] Walton wrote a book about it in 1978 called The Walton Experience, which was adapted into the film Fire in the Sky in 1993, written by Tracy Tormé.[6]

He and his co-workers all passed lie detector tests:

Quote:In the days following Walton's UFO claim, The National Enquirer awarded Walton and his co-workers a $5000 prize for "best UFO case of the year" after they allegedly passed polygraph exams administered by the Enquirer and a UFO organization.[2][7] Walton, his older brother, and his mother were described by the Navajo County, Arizona sheriff as "longtime students of UFOs".[1] Some UFOlogists believe Walton was abducted by aliens. UFOlogist Jim Ledwith said, “For five days, the authorities thought he’d been murdered by his co-workers, and then he was returned. All of the co-workers who were there, who saw the spacecraft, they all took polygraph tests, and they all passed, except for one, and that one was inconclusive.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Travis_Wal...O_incident

Here he is defending his experience:





And, he maintains his story to this very day:

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4487397/wo...y-is-true/

Anyone here a skeptic?

Not a skeptic, I just plain ol' do not believe it.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
Reply
#24
RE: Travis Walton versus The Resurrection.
(November 12, 2017 at 10:10 pm)Jehanne Wrote:
(November 12, 2017 at 9:49 pm)alpha male Wrote: You just talked about Travis Walton. You didn't make any "versus The Resurrection" argument. Are we supposed to actually make the argument for you before refuting it?  Confused

It was kind of implicit in the title of my OP.  But, please, "refute" it?  Why should we value the testimony of a person such as Paul, a clear epileptic who may have been eating too many mushrooms who also thought that the World was flat with demons and angels in the air above, over someone like Travis Walton??
What kind of psychedelic mushrooms grow in desert reqions?
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!






Reply
#25
RE: Travis Walton versus The Resurrection.
(November 16, 2017 at 12:04 am)Godscreated Wrote:
(November 11, 2017 at 1:44 pm)Jehanne Wrote: First, some background (from Wikipedia):


He and his co-workers all passed lie detector tests:


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Travis_Wal...O_incident

Here he is defending his experience:





And, he maintains his story to this very day:

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4487397/wo...y-is-true/

Anyone here a skeptic?

Not a skeptic, I just plain ol' do not believe it.

How is his testimony any different than Paul's?

(November 16, 2017 at 8:02 pm)chimp3 Wrote:
(November 12, 2017 at 10:10 pm)Jehanne Wrote: It was kind of implicit in the title of my OP.  But, please, "refute" it?  Why should we value the testimony of a person such as Paul, a clear epileptic who may have been eating too many mushrooms who also thought that the World was flat with demons and angels in the air above, over someone like Travis Walton??
What kind of psychedelic mushrooms grow in desert reqions?

1st century Palestine was not a desert.  But, how about these:

[Image: desert-mushroom-9-19-14-thumb-600x450-81016.jpg]

https://www.kcet.org/redefine/hard-summe...-mushrooms
Reply
#26
RE: Travis Walton versus The Resurrection.
(November 16, 2017 at 8:59 pm)Jehanne Wrote:
(November 16, 2017 at 12:04 am)Godscreated Wrote: Not a skeptic, I just plain ol' do not believe it.

How is his testimony any different than Paul's?
  Paul was inspired by God through the Holy Spirit. this man claims to have been abducted by aliens that can't possibly have traveled the distance it would take to get hear. We know of no planets that are habitual by beings like to us. If it were possible to reach earth from some where in the galaxy why in the world would they try to keep things a secret, why would they let people go to tell about them if they wanted to remain unnoticed. I mean really how hard can it be to see this man is either a glory seeker or a nut.
GC
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
Reply
#27
RE: Travis Walton versus The Resurrection.
(November 18, 2017 at 2:10 am)Godscreated Wrote:
(November 16, 2017 at 8:59 pm)Jehanne Wrote: How is his testimony any different than Paul's?
  Paul was inspired by God through the Holy Spirit. this man claims to have been abducted by aliens that can't possibly have traveled the distance it would take to get hear. We know of no planets that are habitual by beings like to us. If it were possible to reach earth from some where in the galaxy why in the world would they try to keep things a secret, why would they let people go to tell about them if they wanted to remain unnoticed. I mean really how hard can it be to see this man is either a glory seeker or a nut.
GC

What makes Walton's story implausible is not that we didn't discover aliens but the story he says and his character as a swindler. On the other hand Paul's "world" is actually without any evidence. Paul belied that there were actually seven spherical layers of heaven above the firmament (which extended from the earth to the moon): Mercury, Venus, the Sun, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, (not always in that order), and above them all, the sphere of the stars. Each was filled with all manner of physical things: trees, gardens, rivers, palaces - everything you could find on earth you could find in heaven. In fact, everything on earth was merely the imperfect copy and shadow of the real things in the heavens, and as you ascended from heaven to higher heaven, the more real and perfect things became, the closer you drew to God. Paul even claims in 2 Corinthians 12:2-4 he knows a guy who "was taken as far up as the third heaven," where he heard "things that are not to be told, that no mortal is permitted to repeat"

Now today this is the definition of a nut.
teachings of the Bible are so muddled and self-contradictory that it was possible for Christians to happily burn heretics alive for five long centuries. It was even possible for the most venerated patriarchs of the Church, like St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, to conclude that heretics should be tortured (Augustine) or killed outright (Aquinas). Martin Luther and John Calvin advocated the wholesale murder of heretics, apostates, Jews, and witches. - Sam Harris, "Letter To A Christian Nation"
Reply
#28
RE: Travis Walton versus The Resurrection.
(November 16, 2017 at 12:04 am)Godscreated Wrote: [quote pid='1655059' dateline='1510422268']
I just plain ol' do not believe it.

[/quote]

That's how I feel about all religion.



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply
#29
RE: Travis Walton versus The Resurrection.
(November 18, 2017 at 2:10 am)Godscreated Wrote:
(November 16, 2017 at 8:59 pm)Jehanne Wrote: How is his testimony any different than Paul's?
  Paul was inspired by God through the Holy Spirit. this man claims to have been abducted by aliens that can't possibly have traveled the distance it would take to get hear. We know of no planets that are habitual by beings like to us. If it were possible to reach earth from some where in the galaxy why in the world would they try to keep things a secret, why would they let people go to tell about them if they wanted to remain unnoticed. I mean really how hard can it be to see this man is either a glory seeker or a nut.
GC

Your "reasoning" is circular.  How do you know that Paul was inspired as opposed to being just another 1st-century loon?  Why not just say that he was just another nutjob like Travis Walton, except 2,000 years earlier in time?
Reply
#30
RE: Travis Walton versus The Resurrection.
(November 18, 2017 at 3:16 pm)Jehanne Wrote:
(November 18, 2017 at 2:10 am)Godscreated Wrote:   Paul was inspired by God through the Holy Spirit. this man claims to have been abducted by aliens that can't possibly have traveled the distance it would take to get hear. We know of no planets that are habitual by beings like to us. If it were possible to reach earth from some where in the galaxy why in the world would they try to keep things a secret, why would they let people go to tell about them if they wanted to remain unnoticed. I mean really how hard can it be to see this man is either a glory seeker or a nut.
GC

Your "reasoning" is circular.  How do you know that Paul was inspired as opposed to being just another 1st-century loon?  Why not just say that he was just another nutjob like Travis Walton, except 2,000 years earlier in time?

Because what Paul taught us about God has been experienced by me, revealed by the Holy Spirit. I have found what Paul said to be true in my life. Paul never claimed to have seen space ships that couldn't have made a journey across the galaxy, he did claim to experience the supernatural God and creator of the universe as billions have over the last 2000 years.

GC

(November 18, 2017 at 9:38 am)downbeatplumb Wrote:
(November 16, 2017 at 12:04 am)Godscreated Wrote: [quote pid='1655059' dateline='1510422268']
I just plain ol' do not believe it.

That's how I feel about all religion.
[/quote]

It's your right, given to you by the God you reject.

GC

(November 18, 2017 at 2:49 am)Fake Messiah Wrote:
(November 18, 2017 at 2:10 am)Godscreated Wrote:   Paul was inspired by God through the Holy Spirit. this man claims to have been abducted by aliens that can't possibly have traveled the distance it would take to get hear. We know of no planets that are habitual by beings like to us. If it were possible to reach earth from some where in the galaxy why in the world would they try to keep things a secret, why would they let people go to tell about them if they wanted to remain unnoticed. I mean really how hard can it be to see this man is either a glory seeker or a nut.
GC

What makes Walton's story implausible is not that we didn't discover aliens but the story he says and his character as a swindler. On the other hand Paul's "world" is actually without any evidence. Paul belied that there were actually seven spherical layers of heaven above the firmament (which extended from the earth to the moon): Mercury, Venus, the Sun, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, (not always in that order), and above them all, the sphere of the stars. Each was filled with all manner of physical things: trees, gardens, rivers, palaces - everything you could find on earth you could find in heaven. In fact, everything on earth was merely the imperfect copy and shadow of the real things in the heavens, and as you ascended from heaven to higher heaven, the more real and perfect things became, the closer you drew to God. Paul even claims in 2 Corinthians 12:2-4 he knows a guy who "was taken as far up as the third heaven," where he heard "things that are not to be told, that no mortal is permitted to repeat"

Now today this is the definition of a nut.

  Seems you know things about Paul others do not, then it could be that you know nothing about what he teaches. Tell me this, you should have the answer since you seem to know all about what the Bible teaches. Why did the writer of Genesis know that the stars were innumerable when only about 6000 stars are visible to the human eye? The ancient people knew that the stars were numerable because they studied them, they were more observable of the stars then they the common man of today even with all our knowledge. Most people do not know that only 6000 stars are visible with the naked eye.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  In what way is the Resurrection the best explanation? GrandizerII 159 14892 November 25, 2019 at 6:46 am
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  The Gospel of Peter versus the Gospel of Matthew. Jehanne 47 5755 July 14, 2018 at 12:22 am
Last Post: Godscreated
  The Big Debate -- Price versus Ehrman Jehanne 43 9718 November 26, 2016 at 3:42 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  Why do Christians believe in the Resurrection of Jesus but not alien abductions? Jehanne 72 11700 June 27, 2016 at 1:54 am
Last Post: Redbeard The Pink
  It's Always Sunny - evolution versus Christianity LadyForCamus 201 42558 February 27, 2016 at 1:19 pm
Last Post: Nihilist Virus
  We can be certain of NO resurrection - A Response Randy Carson 136 37547 October 2, 2015 at 4:10 am
Last Post: Aractus
  Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach Randy Carson 1298 177984 July 26, 2015 at 10:05 am
Last Post: Randy Carson
  Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach BrianSoddingBoru4 160 24733 July 5, 2015 at 6:35 pm
Last Post: Jenny A
  Obama and the simulated resurrection professor 116 18005 April 25, 2015 at 10:39 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) His_Majesty 1617 322862 January 12, 2015 at 5:58 pm
Last Post: dyresand



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)