Evolution

[The Grand Nudger]

The notion of a karmic loophole to excuse your actions is a foolish dogma.  Everyone will get what they deserve...even you. Can you prove otherwise?

[Little Rik]

The notion of a karmic loophole to excuse your actions is a foolish dogma.  Everyone will get what they deserve...even you.  Can you prove otherwise?

Gee, that is terrible mate.  

I am in a big big trouble after what you just said.  
I just think about all the bad karma that I got when I was scolding my kids in various occasions.  

Who will help me now?  

[Homeless Nutter]

Little Rik doesn't come here to debate, or learn - he comes here to teach. He doesn't perceive anyone here as equal partner in a discussion, everyone who disagrees with him is just an unruly, stupid child that needs to be derided and reprimanded.

He's a narcissistic nut-job. He can't be reasoned with, because he can't comprehend the possibility that he's wrong about anything.

[GrandizerII]

Little Rik doesn't come here to debate, or learn - he comes here to teach. He doesn't perceive anyone here as equal partner in a discussion, everyone who disagrees with him is just an unruly, stupid child that needs to be derided and reprimanded.

He's a narcissistic nut-job. He can't be reasoned with, because he can't comprehend the possibility that he's wrong about anything.

Allow me to quote this for Rik's viewing pleasure. I bet most if not all agree here with thus analysis. Its clear as sun to me at least.

[Little Rik]

Little Rik doesn't come here to debate, or learn - he comes here to teach. He doesn't perceive anyone here as equal partner in a discussion, everyone who disagrees with him is just an unruly, stupid child that needs to be derided and reprimanded.

He's a narcissistic nut-job. He can't be reasoned with, because he can't comprehend the possibility that he's wrong about anything.

Allow me to quote this for Rik's viewing pleasure. I bet most if not all agree here with thus analysis. Its clear as sun to me at least.

If the nutter thinks that I am wrong about every thing then how come that so far not a single person in here is able to answer any of the questions in the OP correctly?  

For people that allege and declare that they know very well how evolution works it shouldn't be difficult to answer these question correctly, isn't it.  

[GrandizerII]

Allow me to quote this for Rik's viewing pleasure. I bet most if not all agree here with thus analysis. Its clear as sun to me at least.

If the nutter thinks that I am wrong about every thing then how come that so far not a single person in here is able to answer any of the questions in the OP correctly?  

For people that allege and declare that they know very well how evolution works it shouldn't be difficult to answer these question correctly, isn't it.  

Thanks for proving the point. You are unable to see how you could be wrong about anything, no matter what we say. You, as far as you're concerned, are a master of everything. You can't be wrong about anything. But how you perceive yourself isn't in line with how we are perceiving you. You see yourself as a guru, we see you for the fool you are.

[Amarok]

For people that allege and declare that they know very well how evolution works it shouldn't be difficult to answer these question correctly, isn't 

We do understand evolution . We don't understand whatever the hell your talking about . Because it's not evolution . It's gibberish.

As for your questions you can't answer a question if the person asking it seems to have no clue what their saying or their talking about . And the few questions that make any kind of sense are answered only for you to ignore the answer and continue the same empty rant as before you asked . Because you won't except the answer even when it is the correct answer .

[Little Rik]

For people that allege and declare that they know very well how evolution works it shouldn't be difficult to answer these question correctly, isn't 

We do understand evolution . We don't understand whatever the hell your talking about . Because it's not evolution . It's gibberish.

As for your questions you can't answer a question if the person asking it seems to have no clue what their saying or their talking about . And the few questions that make any kind of sense are answered only for you to ignore the answer and continue the same empty rant as before you asked . Because you won't except the answer even when it is the correct answer .

I see...........and the correct answer is where?

Please help LR to find these correct answers because LR can not find any.  

[Amarok]

[The Grand Nudger]

The OP Q's have been answered many times by many posters over these many pages.  This thread ceased to be about evolution within the first three or four.  

Since we're pretending that it still has anything to do with evolution or the op q's....however, let's answer them again.

1) Is evolution based only in body changes or involve consciousness as well?
2) What is driving evolution?
Survival only or involve also the need to reach some goal in life?
3) Are individual who are not able to survive lost for ever or will pop up in a different environment  most suitable to their capabilities to survive?
4) Did Darwin and other really studied other possibilities other than whether evolution is driven only by survival?
5) Can a plant evolve into an animal, an animal into a human or plant stay plant, animal stay animal and human stay human?
6) If evolution exist is because there is a goal to reach or is all about random chances?
7) Does evolution act like the gear of a vehicle that increase his speed as it change the gear?

1. No.
2. No.
3. No.
4. Yes.
5. No.
6. No.
7. No.