Posts: 2412
Threads: 5
Joined: January 3, 2018
Reputation:
22
RE: Studying Mathematics Thread
March 23, 2018 at 7:44 am
(March 22, 2018 at 9:58 pm)Grandizer Wrote: I sort of see it now. It seems it's all about continuing the pattern to infinity, starting from an intuitive sawtooth function.
The basic idea is to make sure the problem points get distributed throughout the interval while keeping the function continuous.
In the sin(3^n x)/2^n , the ide is that we have functions of smaller and smaller amplitude but larger and larger derivatives added up in a way that 'problems mount up' at any point.
There is a much deeper result is that *any* continuous function can be approximated as well as you like by a continuous nowhere differentiable function.
Posts: 6609
Threads: 73
Joined: May 31, 2014
Reputation:
56
RE: Studying Mathematics Thread
March 24, 2018 at 8:45 am
Some trigonometry fun:
tanx = sinx/cosx
cotx = cosx/sinx
Is tanx = 1/cotx? And is cotx = 1/tanx?
It seems like the answer to both is "no", but I could be mistaken. Correct me if so.
Here's my [probably mathematically naive] reasoning:
If x = 0, then tanx = sinx/cosx = 0, while 1/cotx = 1/(cosx/sinx) is undefined (since sin(0) = 0). Therefore, tanx != 1/cotx.
If x = pi/2, then cotx = cosx/sinx = 0, while 1/tanx = 1/(sinx/cosx) is undefined (since cos(pi/2) = 0). Therefore, cotx != 1/tanx.
Posts: 2412
Threads: 5
Joined: January 3, 2018
Reputation:
22
RE: Studying Mathematics Thread
March 24, 2018 at 9:52 am
tan x=1/cot x and cot x=1/tan x *whenever both are defined*.
But the full range of definition of tan x is not the same as the full range of definition of 1/cot x.
Posts: 6609
Threads: 73
Joined: May 31, 2014
Reputation:
56
RE: Studying Mathematics Thread
April 4, 2018 at 10:35 pm
(This post was last modified: April 4, 2018 at 10:49 pm by GrandizerII.)
The limit (as n approaches infinity) of (1+2+3+...+n)/(n^2) is actually 1/2 ... not 0!
I was confused when I first saw this because just looking at it, it seemed that you just had to increase the value of n to infinity (in which case the limit would be 0), but what I initially failed to keep in mind is that not only is n increasing in value as it approaches infinity but the number of terms increases in the numerator as well. That's why the denominator never goes high enough to demolish the fraction to 0/infinity.
As to how to arrive at the correct answer:
the numerator (1+2+3+...+n) = n(n+1)/2
I will demonstrate this is true another time ...
This means the whole expression up above (after the limit) is n(n+1)/(2n^2) = (n+1)/(2n) = n/(2n)+1/(2n) = 1/2 + 1/(2n)
Therefore, the limit (as n approaches infinity) of that result is 1/2.
Posts: 2412
Threads: 5
Joined: January 3, 2018
Reputation:
22
RE: Studying Mathematics Thread
April 5, 2018 at 7:41 am
(April 4, 2018 at 10:35 pm)Grandizer Wrote: The limit (as n approaches infinity) of (1+2+3+...+n)/(n^2) is actually 1/2 ... not 0!
I was confused when I first saw this because just looking at it, it seemed that you just had to increase the value of n to infinity (in which case the limit would be 0), but what I initially failed to keep in mind is that not only is n increasing in value as it approaches infinity but the number of terms increases in the numerator as well. That's why the denominator never goes high enough to demolish the fraction to 0/infinity.
As to how to arrive at the correct answer:
the numerator (1+2+3+...+n) = n(n+1)/2
I will demonstrate this is true another time ...
This means the whole expression up above (after the limit) is n(n+1)/(2n^2) = (n+1)/(2n) = n/(2n)+1/(2n) = 1/2 + 1/(2n)
Therefore, the limit (as n approaches infinity) of that result is 1/2.
OK, now try
(1^2 + 2^2 + 3^2 +...+n^2)/n^3
and
(1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 +...+n^3 )/n^4.
Any guesses for a generalization?
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: Studying Mathematics Thread
April 5, 2018 at 8:48 am
(April 5, 2018 at 7:41 am)polymath257 Wrote: (April 4, 2018 at 10:35 pm)Grandizer Wrote: The limit (as n approaches infinity) of (1+2+3+...+n)/(n^2) is actually 1/2 ... not 0!
I was confused when I first saw this because just looking at it, it seemed that you just had to increase the value of n to infinity (in which case the limit would be 0), but what I initially failed to keep in mind is that not only is n increasing in value as it approaches infinity but the number of terms increases in the numerator as well. That's why the denominator never goes high enough to demolish the fraction to 0/infinity.
As to how to arrive at the correct answer:
the numerator (1+2+3+...+n) = n(n+1)/2
I will demonstrate this is true another time ...
This means the whole expression up above (after the limit) is n(n+1)/(2n^2) = (n+1)/(2n) = n/(2n)+1/(2n) = 1/2 + 1/(2n)
Therefore, the limit (as n approaches infinity) of that result is 1/2.
OK, now try
(1^2 + 2^2 + 3^2 +...+n^2)/n^3
and
(1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 +...+n^3 )/n^4.
Any guesses for a generalization?
After some scrawling and trying to remember old methods, I got
Sum(n^2) = (n/6)(2n^2 + 3n + 1)
Giving limit when divided by n^3 as 1/3.
If I have the energy I'll do n^4 later, but I guess it might be 1/4!
Posts: 2412
Threads: 5
Joined: January 3, 2018
Reputation:
22
RE: Studying Mathematics Thread
April 5, 2018 at 9:01 am
(This post was last modified: April 5, 2018 at 9:02 am by polymath257.)
(April 5, 2018 at 8:48 am)robvalue Wrote: (April 5, 2018 at 7:41 am)polymath257 Wrote: OK, now try
(1^2 + 2^2 + 3^2 +...+n^2)/n^3
and
(1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 +...+n^3 )/n^4.
Any guesses for a generalization?
After some scrawling and trying to remember old methods, I got
Sum(n^2) = (n/6)(2n^2 + 3n + 1)
Giving limit when divided by n^3 as 1/3.
If I have the energy I'll do n^4 later, but I guess it might be 1/4!
Good guess (assuming that isn't 4 factorial)! Now the challenge: prove it.
Hint: Riemann
Posts: 6609
Threads: 73
Joined: May 31, 2014
Reputation:
56
RE: Studying Mathematics Thread
April 5, 2018 at 9:03 am
(April 5, 2018 at 7:41 am)polymath257 Wrote: (April 4, 2018 at 10:35 pm)Grandizer Wrote: The limit (as n approaches infinity) of (1+2+3+...+n)/(n^2) is actually 1/2 ... not 0!
I was confused when I first saw this because just looking at it, it seemed that you just had to increase the value of n to infinity (in which case the limit would be 0), but what I initially failed to keep in mind is that not only is n increasing in value as it approaches infinity but the number of terms increases in the numerator as well. That's why the denominator never goes high enough to demolish the fraction to 0/infinity.
As to how to arrive at the correct answer:
the numerator (1+2+3+...+n) = n(n+1)/2
I will demonstrate this is true another time ...
This means the whole expression up above (after the limit) is n(n+1)/(2n^2) = (n+1)/(2n) = n/(2n)+1/(2n) = 1/2 + 1/(2n)
Therefore, the limit (as n approaches infinity) of that result is 1/2.
OK, now try
(1^2 + 2^2 + 3^2 +...+n^2)/n^3
and
(1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 +...+n^3 )/n^4.
Any guesses for a generalization?
First series:
This is the theorem for the numerator series:
1^2 + 2^2 + 3^2 +...+n^2 = n(n+1)(2n+1)/6
Including the denominator, this means the first series up above in the quote is equal to:
n(n+1)(2n+1)/(6n^3) = (n+1)(2n+3)/(6n^2) = (2n^2+5n+3)/(6n^2) = 1/3 + 5/(6n) + 1/(2n^2)
The limit (as n approaches infinity) of n(n+1)(2n+1)/(6n^3) is therefore:
1/3
Second series:
1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 +...+n^3 = (n^2(n+1)^2)/4
Including the denominator, this means the second series up above in the quote is equal to:
(n^2(n+1)^2)/(4n^4) = (n^2+2n+1)/(4n^2) = 1/4 + 1/(2n) + 1/(4n^2)
The limit (as n approaches infinity) of (n^2(n+1)^2)/(4n^4) is therefore:
1/4
Posts: 6609
Threads: 73
Joined: May 31, 2014
Reputation:
56
RE: Studying Mathematics Thread
April 5, 2018 at 8:25 pm
To prove 1+2+3+...+n=n(n+1)/2
Let S = 1+2+3+...+n
In this case, S is also:
n+n-1+n-2+...+1
If you add both equations of S, you get:
2S=n+1+(n-1+2)+(n-2+3) + ... + n+1
2S = n+1 + n+1 + n+1 + ... + n+1 (n times)
Therefore S = n(n+1)/2
Therefore 1+2+3+...+n = n(n+1)/2
Now for the other two theorems stated in my previous post, how to derive them remains a puzzle to me at this stage. I can prove them via mathematical induction only.
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: Studying Mathematics Thread
April 6, 2018 at 2:18 am
(This post was last modified: April 6, 2018 at 2:19 am by robvalue.)
(April 5, 2018 at 8:25 pm)Grandizer Wrote: To prove 1+2+3+...+n=n(n+1)/2
Let S = 1+2+3+...+n
In this case, S is also:
n+n-1+n-2+...+1
If you add both equations of S, you get:
2S=n+1+(n-1+2)+(n-2+3) + ... + n+1
2S = n+1 + n+1 + n+1 + ... + n+1 (n times)
Therefore S = n(n+1)/2
Therefore 1+2+3+...+n = n(n+1)/2
Now for the other two theorems stated in my previous post, how to derive them remains a puzzle to me at this stage. I can prove them via mathematical induction only.
I can show you how if you want
|