Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 17, 2024, 12:17 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Studying Mathematics Thread
#51
RE: Studying Mathematics Thread
(March 22, 2018 at 9:58 pm)Grandizer Wrote: I sort of see it now. It seems it's all about continuing the pattern to infinity, starting from an intuitive sawtooth function.

The basic idea is to make sure the problem points get distributed throughout the interval while keeping the function continuous.

In the sin(3^n x)/2^n , the ide is that we have functions of smaller and smaller amplitude but larger and larger derivatives added up in a way that 'problems mount up' at any point.

There is a much deeper result is that *any* continuous function can be approximated as well as you like by a continuous nowhere differentiable function.
Reply
#52
RE: Studying Mathematics Thread
Some trigonometry fun:

tanx = sinx/cosx

cotx = cosx/sinx

Is tanx = 1/cotx? And is cotx = 1/tanx?

It seems like the answer to both is "no", but I could be mistaken. Correct me if so.

Here's my [probably mathematically naive] reasoning:

If x = 0, then tanx = sinx/cosx = 0, while 1/cotx = 1/(cosx/sinx) is undefined (since sin(0) = 0). Therefore, tanx != 1/cotx.

If x = pi/2, then cotx = cosx/sinx = 0, while 1/tanx = 1/(sinx/cosx) is undefined (since cos(pi/2) = 0). Therefore, cotx != 1/tanx.
Reply
#53
RE: Studying Mathematics Thread
tan x=1/cot x and cot x=1/tan x *whenever both are defined*.

But the full range of definition of tan x is not the same as the full range of definition of 1/cot x.
Reply
#54
RE: Studying Mathematics Thread
The limit (as n approaches infinity) of (1+2+3+...+n)/(n^2) is actually 1/2 ... not 0!

I was confused when I first saw this because just looking at it, it seemed that you just had to increase the value of n to infinity (in which case the limit would be 0), but what I initially failed to keep in mind is that not only is n increasing in value as it approaches infinity but the number of terms increases in the numerator as well. That's why the denominator never goes high enough to demolish the fraction to 0/infinity.

As to how to arrive at the correct answer:

the numerator (1+2+3+...+n) = n(n+1)/2
I will demonstrate this is true another time ...

This means the whole expression up above (after the limit) is n(n+1)/(2n^2) = (n+1)/(2n) = n/(2n)+1/(2n) = 1/2 + 1/(2n)

Therefore, the limit (as n approaches infinity) of that result is 1/2.
Reply
#55
RE: Studying Mathematics Thread
(April 4, 2018 at 10:35 pm)Grandizer Wrote: The limit (as n approaches infinity) of (1+2+3+...+n)/(n^2) is actually 1/2 ... not 0!

I was confused when I first saw this because just looking at it, it seemed that you just had to increase the value of n to infinity (in which case the limit would be 0), but what I initially failed to keep in mind is that not only is n increasing in value as it approaches infinity but the number of terms increases in the numerator as well. That's why the denominator never goes high enough to demolish the fraction to 0/infinity.

As to how to arrive at the correct answer:

the numerator (1+2+3+...+n) = n(n+1)/2
I will demonstrate this is true another time ...

This means the whole expression up above (after the limit) is n(n+1)/(2n^2) = (n+1)/(2n) = n/(2n)+1/(2n) = 1/2 + 1/(2n)

Therefore, the limit (as n approaches infinity) of that result is 1/2.

OK, now try

(1^2 + 2^2 + 3^2 +...+n^2)/n^3

and

(1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 +...+n^3 )/n^4.

Any guesses for a generalization?
Reply
#56
RE: Studying Mathematics Thread
(April 5, 2018 at 7:41 am)polymath257 Wrote:
(April 4, 2018 at 10:35 pm)Grandizer Wrote: The limit (as n approaches infinity) of (1+2+3+...+n)/(n^2) is actually 1/2 ... not 0!

I was confused when I first saw this because just looking at it, it seemed that you just had to increase the value of n to infinity (in which case the limit would be 0), but what I initially failed to keep in mind is that not only is n increasing in value as it approaches infinity but the number of terms increases in the numerator as well. That's why the denominator never goes high enough to demolish the fraction to 0/infinity.

As to how to arrive at the correct answer:

the numerator (1+2+3+...+n) = n(n+1)/2
I will demonstrate this is true another time ...

This means the whole expression up above (after the limit) is n(n+1)/(2n^2) = (n+1)/(2n) = n/(2n)+1/(2n) = 1/2 + 1/(2n)

Therefore, the limit (as n approaches infinity) of that result is 1/2.

OK, now try

(1^2 + 2^2 + 3^2 +...+n^2)/n^3

and

(1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 +...+n^3 )/n^4.

Any guesses for a generalization?

After some scrawling and trying to remember old methods, I got

Sum(n^2) = (n/6)(2n^2 + 3n + 1)

Giving limit when divided by n^3 as 1/3.

If I have the energy I'll do n^4 later, but I guess it might be 1/4!
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#57
RE: Studying Mathematics Thread
(April 5, 2018 at 8:48 am)robvalue Wrote:
(April 5, 2018 at 7:41 am)polymath257 Wrote: OK, now try

(1^2 + 2^2 + 3^2 +...+n^2)/n^3

and

(1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 +...+n^3 )/n^4.

Any guesses for a generalization?

After some scrawling and trying to remember old methods, I got

Sum(n^2) = (n/6)(2n^2 + 3n + 1)

Giving limit when divided by n^3 as 1/3.

If I have the energy I'll do n^4 later, but I guess it might be 1/4!

Good guess (assuming that isn't 4 factorial)! Now the challenge: prove it.

Hint: Riemann
Reply
#58
RE: Studying Mathematics Thread
(April 5, 2018 at 7:41 am)polymath257 Wrote:
(April 4, 2018 at 10:35 pm)Grandizer Wrote: The limit (as n approaches infinity) of (1+2+3+...+n)/(n^2) is actually 1/2 ... not 0!

I was confused when I first saw this because just looking at it, it seemed that you just had to increase the value of n to infinity (in which case the limit would be 0), but what I initially failed to keep in mind is that not only is n increasing in value as it approaches infinity but the number of terms increases in the numerator as well. That's why the denominator never goes high enough to demolish the fraction to 0/infinity.

As to how to arrive at the correct answer:

the numerator (1+2+3+...+n) = n(n+1)/2
I will demonstrate this is true another time ...

This means the whole expression up above (after the limit) is n(n+1)/(2n^2) = (n+1)/(2n) = n/(2n)+1/(2n) = 1/2 + 1/(2n)

Therefore, the limit (as n approaches infinity) of that result is 1/2.

OK, now try

(1^2 + 2^2 + 3^2 +...+n^2)/n^3

and

(1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 +...+n^3 )/n^4.

Any guesses for a generalization?

First series:

This is the theorem for the numerator series:

1^2 + 2^2 + 3^2 +...+n^2 = n(n+1)(2n+1)/6

Including the denominator, this means the first series up above in the quote is equal to:

n(n+1)(2n+1)/(6n^3) = (n+1)(2n+3)/(6n^2) = (2n^2+5n+3)/(6n^2) = 1/3 + 5/(6n) + 1/(2n^2)

The limit (as n approaches infinity) of n(n+1)(2n+1)/(6n^3) is therefore:

1/3

Second series:

1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 +...+n^3 = (n^2(n+1)^2)/4

Including the denominator, this means the second series up above in the quote is equal to:

(n^2(n+1)^2)/(4n^4) = (n^2+2n+1)/(4n^2) = 1/4 + 1/(2n) + 1/(4n^2)

The limit (as n approaches infinity) of (n^2(n+1)^2)/(4n^4) is therefore:

1/4
Reply
#59
RE: Studying Mathematics Thread
To prove 1+2+3+...+n=n(n+1)/2

Let S = 1+2+3+...+n

In this case, S is also:
n+n-1+n-2+...+1

If you add both equations of S, you get:

2S=n+1+(n-1+2)+(n-2+3) + ... + n+1

2S = n+1 + n+1 + n+1 + ... + n+1 (n times)

Therefore S = n(n+1)/2

Therefore 1+2+3+...+n = n(n+1)/2

Now for the other two theorems stated in my previous post, how to derive them remains a puzzle to me at this stage. I can prove them via mathematical induction only.
Reply
#60
RE: Studying Mathematics Thread
(April 5, 2018 at 8:25 pm)Grandizer Wrote: To prove 1+2+3+...+n=n(n+1)/2

Let S = 1+2+3+...+n

In this case, S is also:
n+n-1+n-2+...+1

If you add both equations of S, you get:

2S=n+1+(n-1+2)+(n-2+3) + ... + n+1

2S = n+1 + n+1 + n+1 + ... + n+1   (n times)

Therefore S = n(n+1)/2

Therefore 1+2+3+...+n = n(n+1)/2

Now for the other two theorems stated in my previous post, how to derive them remains a puzzle to me at this stage. I can prove them via mathematical induction only.

I can show you how if you want Smile
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Are you into mathematics? Do you have any cake? ErGingerbreadMandude 71 11411 February 9, 2017 at 2:45 pm
Last Post: Kernel Sohcahtoa
  Is mathematics discovered, developed, or both? Macoleco 26 4757 December 3, 2016 at 11:12 am
Last Post: Jehanne
  Can mathematics act causally? Freedom of thought 6 2550 May 30, 2014 at 12:53 pm
Last Post: MindForgedManacle
  Imaginary friends of mathematics. Anymouse 6 4858 March 20, 2012 at 2:04 pm
Last Post: mannaka
  Mathematics and the Universe Purple Rabbit 77 33590 January 10, 2009 at 6:27 am
Last Post: DD_8630
  Indeterminism in mathematics josef rosenkranz 9 7213 September 27, 2008 at 11:20 am
Last Post: josef rosenkranz



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)