Wikileaks and the USA diplomatic cables

[Mishka]

Just because something is labeled *classified* by an organisation internally does not by default mean that it cannot be distributed by independent parties outside of the jurisdiction of the organisation in question.

Are you to be the one to determine the validity of the classification? LOL!!!

Thank you for letting the rest of us know that you have no idea what you are going on about.

Also, Daniel Ellsberg says you are wrong.

These aren't the Pentagon papers. This stuff will get people killed.

[Jaysyn]

These aren't the Pentagon papers. This stuff will get people killed.

The redacted diplomatic cables will get people killed? The slightly less redacted afghan leak with 3-5 year old troop movements, that no one has been (reportedly) killed over thus far? The upcoming bank leak? Can you turn off Faux News & think for yourself for a few minutes?

I'll think I'll go with Ellsberg & not the weak Internet troll on this one, thanks.

[Mishka]

They weren't redacted well enough.

"Although there is nothing new in learning about corruption among Pakistani intelligence agencies, details of the names of U.S. agents and strategies they used could damage NATO’s war effort, he said.

“It’s not the content as much as it is there are names, there are operations, there’s logistics, there’s sources,” Gibbs said. “All of that information out in a public way has the potential to do harm.”



Read more: http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/...z17eCNruPW"

[Jaysyn]

They weren't redacted well enough.

"Although there is nothing new in learning about corruption among Pakistani intelligence agencies, details of the names of U.S. agents and strategies they used could damage NATO’s war effort, he said.

“It’s not the content as much as it is there are names, there are operations, there’s logistics, there’s sources,” Gibbs said. “All of that information out in a public way has the potential to do harm.”



Read more: http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/...z17eCNruPW"

And it's been over 5 months & nothing has surfaced to prove that this claim (by someone with a vested interest) is even remotely true. And as much as the powers that be want Wikileaks to fail, you can bet your pointy little head that we'd have heard about it by now. The government lies, kid. A lot. I can't believe you haven't figured that out yet.

[Mishka]

They weren't redacted well enough.

"Although there is nothing new in learning about corruption among Pakistani intelligence agencies, details of the names of U.S. agents and strategies they used could damage NATO’s war effort, he said.

“It’s not the content as much as it is there are names, there are operations, there’s logistics, there’s sources,” Gibbs said. “All of that information out in a public way has the potential to do harm.”



Read more: http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/...z17eCNruPW"

And it's been over 5 months & nothing has surfaced to prove that this claim (by someone with a vested interest) is even remotely true. And as much as the powers that be want Wikileaks to fail, you can bet your pointy little head that we'd have heard about it by now. The government lies, kid. A lot. I can't believe you haven't figured that out yet.

Have you seen the media post much at all about Afghanistan and Iraq? Have you wondered why?

[Jaysyn]

Have you seen the media post much at all about Afghanistan and Iraq? Have you wondered why?

What?

What? hock:

[Ashendant]

They weren't redacted well enough.

"Although there is nothing new in learning about corruption among Pakistani intelligence agencies, details of the names of U.S. agents and strategies they used could damage NATO’s war effort, he said.

“It’s not the content as much as it is there are names, there are operations, there’s logistics, there’s sources,” Gibbs said. “All of that information out in a public way has the potential to do harm.”



Read more: http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/...z17eCNruPW"

And it's been over 5 months & nothing has surfaced to prove that this claim (by someone with a vested interest) is even remotely true. And as much as the powers that be want Wikileaks to fail, you can bet your pointy little head that we'd have heard about it by now. The government lies, kid. A lot. I can't believe you haven't figured that out yet.

Have you seen the media post much at all about Afghanistan and Iraq? Have you wondered why?

The pentagon hasn't been able to prove that wikileaks caused any damage, do you believe yourself to be better than the pentagon?

[Mishka]

You know they haven't confirmed that how? You have a source? You thunk they want to advertise their losses of informants?

[Ashendant]

You know they haven't confirmed that how? You have a source? You thunk they want to advertise their losses of informants?

Considering that saying so would gain a lot of backing from the populace yes i think they would do

[Mishka]

You know they haven't confirmed that how? You have a source? You thunk they want to advertise their losses of informants?

Considering that saying so would gain a lot of backing from the populace yes i think they would do

Right, let's tell everyone our snitches are getting killed. There are bound to more to come along after hearing that. Right?