DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Amarok]

The fact that it is complex, specified, and functional/operational does prove it is designed. 

Not it doesn't 

The code didn't write itself.

More ID bunk 

Your posts are informative to the point where you think you need to try to bash me.  You're late to the party.  I have an army of atheist friends.

You bash yourself and nope he's right on time to join in the fun of laughing at you  like all intelligent people are .

[Gwaithmir]

That's a pro for creationists, not a con.

The trouble is that they very much don't like what intelligent people qualified to speak on the subject have to say.  If you view this in the light of service fulfillment (rather than some misbegotten scientific inquiry) alot of the things that seem wtf out there about creationism resolve to something approaching sense.  CDF, for example, is chiefly concerned with not being a monkey.  That carries some unspecified baggage, to his mind.  Creationism and/or ID offers no insight on human origins, no information on the nuts and bolts of the process that lead to our development.  In point of fact it asserts that we could not have developed at all.  This satisfies his desires as a consumer of religious products and services.  Are there religious products and services that include modern synth as a fact?  OFC there are, but their target demo isn't a person like CDF, and because of this one basic fact of who he is, it's not surprising that he chooses intelligent design despite there being many other relatively more factual offerings equally available to him.

Any similarity between monkeys and creationists is an insult to the monkeys. 

[Bucky Ball]

The fact that it is complex, specified, and functional/operational does prove it is designed. 

Nope 
I has been proven to happen all on its own.
http://www.dnaftb.org/26/animation.html

[Rahn127]

When some people don't understand something, they sometimes say a magical god must be responsible for that thing they don't understand.

When they do understand how it works, god is miraculously gone from the equation.

If you understand how something works and you still try to fit a god in, that bit is called delusion.

Which is it CD ?
A lack of understanding or delusion ?

Or dare I say both

[no one]

That's a multileveled question Rahn, with a bit of the arithmetics, not sure the CDFster can follow along.

[Gwaithmir]

That's a multileveled question Rahn, with a bit of the arithmetics, not sure the CDFster can follow along.

Indeed. He doesn't learn because he doesn't want to learn. 

[emilsein]

That's the problem with the whole argument if everything has to be created then how can God just automatically exist, it's illogical and stupid

[madog]

 if everything has to be created then how can God just automatically exist, 

Wishful thinking 

[Rahn127]

I will make the claim that it's always the present. There is no past. There is no future. There is only the ever changing present.

In this scenario of an ever changing present, that would mean that everything changes. Meaning that a god cannot "have always existed". It would mean that a god could exist, but it would need to form within the universe, step by step, until it became a being that had the ability to mold matter.

It also means that this god being isn't all powerful, can only know what is knowable and is subject to change. It can lose it's power. It can be destroyed, in the same way matter is destroyed in a black hole.

So given all that, we still need evidence to believe that such a being exists. So far, I haven't encountered any.

[CDF47]

Oh yeah, Ancient Aliens, LOL.  One of the craziest shows on TV.

Weird, stuffed to the gill with creatards, I thought you'd love it.

I hate that show.