DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Amarok]

I have proven that

No you haven't

[Abaddon_ire]

-Wilkins, Watson and Crick shared the 1962 Noble Prize in Physiology/Medicine (Franklin didn't, having died four years earlier).

Great post.  Interesting information.  Learn something all the time.  Would be cool if we had more posts like this in this thread.

Said the ignoramus who thought that it was just Crick and Watson and had never heard of Wilkins and Franklin until it was pointed out right here.

Seriously, would you place any value on the claims to research on DNA with anyone who didn't know who had discovered it's structure and why? Of course you wouldn't. So why should we?

Given your abject ignorance of the subject, your jabberings have no value at all. You simply haven't a foggiest clue what you are talking about. The best you can manage is to moronically repeat ad nauseum the things you have been told to repeat. There is no evidence of any intelligence at all in your continuous bilge.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

No one needs to prove you wrong.
YOU need to prove you're right. That was Fierce's question.

I have proven that.

---

DNA trivia:

-The molecule was discovered in 1869 by Johann Miescher, who wasn't a biochemist.

-DNA's role in heredity was proved by Oswald Avery, who wasn't a biochemist.

-Of the four people credited with working out the shape of the molecule - Franklin, Wilkins, Watson and Crick - none were biochemists.

-Linus Pauling would have worked out the double helical shape of DNA  if he hadn't got caught up in the 'red scare' in the US (Pauling WAS a biochemist).

-Wilkins, Watson and Crick shared the 1962 Noble Prize in Physiology/Medicine (Franklin didn't, having died four years earlier).

-The Nobel Prize is named for Swedish chemist and inventor of dynamite, Alfred Prize.

Boru

Great post.  Interesting information.  Learn something all the time.  Would be cool if we had more posts like this in this thread.

You know what else would be cool?  If you understood what DNA actually is and (more importantly) what it isn't.

Boru

[Gwaithmir]

No one needs to prove you wrong.
YOU need to prove you're right. That was Fierce's question.

I have proven that.

[CDF47]

Great post.  Interesting information.  Learn something all the time.  Would be cool if we had more posts like this in this thread.

Said the ignoramus who thought that it was just Crick and Watson and had never heard of Wilkins and Franklin until it was pointed out right here.

Seriously, would you place any value on the claims to research on DNA with anyone who didn't know who had discovered it's structure and why? Of course you wouldn't. So why should we?

Given your abject ignorance of the subject, your jabberings have no value at all. You simply haven't a foggiest clue what you are talking about. The best you can manage is to moronically repeat ad nauseum the things you have been told to repeat. There is no evidence of any intelligence at all in your continuous bilge.

This post is nonsense.  I am an engineer, not a biochemist.  I know enough about it to know that it was designed.  I know plenty about DNA.

---

I have proven that.

---

Great post.  Interesting information.  Learn something all the time.  Would be cool if we had more posts like this in this thread.

You know what else would be cool?  If you understood what DNA actually is and (more importantly) what it isn't.

Boru

I know what it is and what it isn't.  He posted some historical information on it which was interesting.

---

I have proven that.

Why do you want me banned so bad?  What have I done or done to you that would warrant this response from you?

[Abaddon_ire]

Said the ignoramus who thought that it was just Crick and Watson and had never heard of Wilkins and Franklin until it was pointed out right here.

Seriously, would you place any value on the claims to research on DNA with anyone who didn't know who had discovered it's structure and why? Of course you wouldn't. So why should we?

Given your abject ignorance of the subject, your jabberings have no value at all. You simply haven't a foggiest clue what you are talking about. The best you can manage is to moronically repeat ad nauseum the things you have been told to repeat. There is no evidence of any intelligence at all in your continuous bilge.

This post is nonsense.  I am an engineer, not a biochemist.  I know enough about it to know that it was designed.  I know plenty about DNA.

The evidence before us shows that you are not an engineer, have no clue about DNA and have not even read your magic book.

Why do you want me banned so bad?  What have I done or done to you that would warrant this response from you?

You have posted a constant stream of utter shite about topics you do not understand in abject slavery to your schoolyard bully of a god.

You are simply a target of outright mockery as is your immoral, brutish, insane god.

Everyone is just a tad tired of your bullshit.

I can respect theists who at least try to present cogent arguments.

You however are the turd in the punch bowl. Everyone can see it. Some are too polite to point this out to the host. Some are not. I am not.

Personally, I think you should in principle be banned for sheer idiotic fuckwittery. But principle be damned. I think there is far more mileage out of keeping you around. I have already pointed others to this thread as an illustration of just how stupid religion makes people become. So, rock on CDF. The more people you convince that your beliefs are abject bollocks, the better for the entire human race. You are doing a damn fine job.

BTW, your god is an ignorant fuckwit with the morals of a feral cat. May he strike me down with lightning if I am lying.

<taps foot>

Nope. Your god is as useful as a chocolate crash helmet.

[CDF47]

This post is nonsense.  I am an engineer, not a biochemist.  I know enough about it to know that it was designed.  I know plenty about DNA.

The evidence before us shows that you are not an engineer, have no clue about DNA and have not even read your magic book.

Why do you want me banned so bad?  What have I done or done to you that would warrant this response from you?

You have posted a constant stream of utter shite about topics you do not understand in abject slavery to your schoolyard bully of a god.

You are simply a target of outright mockery as is your immoral, brutish, insane god.

Everyone is just a tad tired of your bullshit.

I can respect theists who at least try to present cogent arguments.

You however are the turd in the punch bowl. Everyone can see it. Some are too polite to point this out to the host. Some are not. I am not.

Personally, I think you should in principle be banned for sheer idiotic fuckwittery. But principle be damned. I think there is far more mileage out of keeping you around. I have already pointed others to this thread as an illustration of just how stupid religion makes people become. So, rock on CDF. The more people you convince that your beliefs are abject bollocks, the better for the entire human race. You are doing a damn fine job.

BTW, your god is an ignorant fuckwit with the morals of a feral cat. May he strike me down with lightning if I am lying.

<taps foot>

Nope. Your god is as useful as a chocolate crash helmet.

I think you have some problems.

[no one]

I invented the Interwebs, The CDFSTER isn't paying it's fair share. I am hereby forced to evict it.

YOU HAVE UNTIL 1830 PST TO REMOVE YOURSELF.

[Amarok]

This post is nonsense.  I am an engineer, not a biochemist.  I know enough about it to know that it was designed.  I know plenty about DNA.

No you don't

---

I think you have some problems.

You have far far far more

[The Valkyrie]

DNA trivia:

-The molecule was discovered in 1869 by Johann Miescher, who wasn't a biochemist.

-DNA's role in heredity was proved by Oswald Avery, who wasn't a biochemist.

-Of the four people credited with working out the shape of the molecule - Franklin, Wilkins, Watson and Crick - none were biochemists.

-Linus Pauling would have worked out the double helical shape of DNA  if he hadn't got caught up in the 'red scare' in the US (Pauling WAS a biochemist).

-Wilkins, Watson and Crick shared the 1962 Noble Prize in Physiology/Medicine (Franklin didn't, having died four years earlier).

-The Nobel Prize is named for Swedish chemist and inventor of dynamite, Alfred Prize.

Boru

So, you're saying biochemists are all incompetent commies?