DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Gwaithmir]

---

Typical apologist evasion. I didn't ask you for your opinion or interpretation of the article. I asked you to quote the relevant passage(s) "....for proving the concept of eternal life when combined with the multiverse theory from quantum mechanics."

You're an idiot. Why would I quote something that has nothing to do with [what] I stated. If you want to learn more about superposition and the multiverse theories, then look it up yourself. It's common knowledge.

You're a liar. The passages I asked you to quote are those from the article which you claim supports your hypothesis. It's not up to me to connect the dots. You are vacillating because you KNOW that the article, when subjected to rational scrutiny, does NOT prove "....the concept of eternal life when combined with the multiverse theory from quantum mechanics."

Thank you for proving that you're a fraud. We're done here.

[Amarok]

Everena: Point proven^^^ I am just trying to give constructive criticism. And like I said, atheism is looking more and more like a personality type. Journalists have written blogs about the hateful behavior of new atheists and scientists have publicly distanced themselves from atheism because of it (even Tyson and Dawkins) 
https://bigthink.com/think-tank/neil-deg...r-agnostic

So whining because the religious don't like being called out on their nonsense 

You are the same type of hateful immature people on twitter, yahoo groups, and other atheist forums and don't think the public has not noticed this. If anything, you are causing more people to believe in God because of it and I don't know, maybe that's your hidden agenda(haha) but none of us (and by that I mean none of us in the entire world due to social media) think of atheists as dull boring geeks who are really into science anymore. So good job.

No were the kind of people who have zero patience for bullocks

[Everena]

Once again non sequitur and an assertion and that science article fails and does not refute the overall case for plants having conscience i also point out my response was your claim "no one believes plants are conscience " which was a lie .

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41477-018-0237-3

Read the article i linked up there that has  the scientists who were the ones initially claiming plants had intelligence, and are now saying it was taken the wrong way and no it does not mean plants are conscious in any way.

[Amarok]

I am laughing, not angry. Do not pretend you know me or any of my emotions. You know nothing about me or any other believer and your foolish stereotypes make you look like a bunch of morons. If you want people to take you seriously, learn to have normal human adult discussions instead of acting like a bunch of angry, insulting, bullyish hateful children who refuse to use any logic. You just come off as defiant, mean, and immature, and never thoughtful, interesting or intelligent.

You certainly aren't acting like you are laughing you are acting like a walking persecution complex soundboard.

[Bucky Ball]

I won't have to get back to you. Science will publish it when it's proven and you can read it for yourself. My guess would be with in the next 5 years

LOL, says the fool who can't tell the difference between quantum entanglement and quantum superposition. 
You're hysterical. And the moon is made of green cheese. 

Wrong. I am the only one using any logic. And 93% of the world can get this, so that should really, really tell you something.

Sure you are dear. Sure you are. LOL.  Now run along outside and play. The adults will have a discussion about the childish new troll. 
That article said nothing about 93 % It tells me you don't know what the "ad populum" fallacy is, (as you have no education), and she has the gall to use a fallacy RIGHT AFTER claiming she is using logic. What a dolt. An ignoramus.  

They have intelligence, they have brains. Even ants have intelligence.

I see the level of ignorance we have here .... well ants are probably more intelligent Evy. She has not one shred of evidence ants are "intelligent". On the other hand she said she was intelligent ... I see what she means by that. LOL

[Amarok]

Once again non sequitur and an assertion and that science article fails and does not refute the overall case for plants having conscience i also point out my response was your claim "no one believes plants are conscience " which was a lie .

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41477-018-0237-3

Read the article i linked up there that has  the scientists who were the ones initially claiming plants had intelligence, and are now saying it was taken the wrong way and no it does not mean plants are conscious in any way.

I read it it's rubbish and it can be countered
https://gizmodo.com/are-plants-conscious-1826365668

there is a debate 
https://qz.com/1294941/a-debate-over-pla...uman-mind/

[Angrboda]

When and if it happens, get back to us .... lol, 

Everena: I won't have to get back to you. Science will publish it when it's proven and you can read it for yourself. My guess would be with in the next 5 years

[GrandizerII]

Everena, how you feel about a certain position is not what determines the truth of that position.

I mean, if you want to talk logic, this is basic logic right here.

[Everena]

Everena: Point proven^^^ I am just trying to give constructive criticism. And like I said, atheism is looking more and more like a personality type. Journalists have written blogs about the hateful behavior of new atheists and scientists have publicly distanced themselves from atheism because of it (even Tyson and Dawkins) 
https://bigthink.com/think-tank/neil-deg...r-agnostic

So whining because the religious don't like being called out on their nonsense 

You are the same type of hateful immature people on twitter, yahoo groups, and other atheist forums and don't think the public has not noticed this. If anything, you are causing more people to believe in God because of it and I don't know, maybe that's your hidden agenda(haha) but none of us (and by that I mean none of us in the entire world due to social media) think of atheists as dull boring geeks who are really into science anymore. So good job.

No were the kind of people who have zero patience for bullocks

You do not sound like smart people at all, if that is what you were hoping people would think. No one thinks so. You refuse to consider anything but hateful atheist propaganda. You are as brainwashed as the Nazis and it shows, whether you want to accept it or not. Now I know this does not apply to all of you because some of you are really not hateful or dumb, and I know some of you are probably very good people, but you are being drowned out by these other......ppl.

[Angrboda]

So whining because the religious don't like being called out on their nonsense 

No were the kind of people who have zero patience for bullocks

You do not sound like smart people at all, if that is what you were hoping people would think. No one thinks so. You refuse to consider anything but hateful atheist propaganda. You are as brainwashed as the Nazis and it shows, whether you want to accept it or not. Now I know this does not apply to all of you because some of you are really not hateful or dumb, and I know some of you are probably very good people, but you are being drowned out by these other......ppl.

First time on the internet?