Posts: 20476
Threads: 447
Joined: June 16, 2014
Reputation:
111
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
November 24, 2018 at 11:57 pm
(This post was last modified: November 24, 2018 at 11:57 pm by ignoramus.)
Sticks head in!
Never dreamed this thread can find another champion to replace CDF47's outstanding contribution!
You give 'em hell Everena!
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Posts: 19789
Threads: 57
Joined: September 24, 2010
Reputation:
85
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
November 25, 2018 at 12:06 am
(This post was last modified: November 25, 2018 at 12:16 am by Anomalocaris.)
Quora? Really?
Even to those thoroughly acclimated to the worst ignorances of the dumbest theists in this forum, this degree of cluelessness is still ghastly be behold.
Posts: 926
Threads: 0
Joined: November 10, 2018
Reputation:
0
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
November 25, 2018 at 12:08 am
Posts: 844
Threads: 3
Joined: November 16, 2018
Reputation:
15
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
November 25, 2018 at 12:34 am
(November 25, 2018 at 12:08 am)"Everena Wrote: (November 25, 2018 at 12:06 am)Anomalocaris Wrote: Quora? Really?
It was a neuroscientist answering the question. Can you not read well?    
From the Quora answer that you clearly didn't read: "The difference mainly has to do with emphasis, and there is a lot of overlap."
From Wikipedia: "Neuroscience (or neurobiology) is the scientific study of the nervous system."
Guess where "neurobiology" redirects to.
While I was there I clicked on " Cognitive Neuroscience", because that's such a challenge. The historical section goes back to the 19th century, but you might want to give Phrenology a pass. The field took off in the 1980s with the advent of MRI and CT scanning abilities linked to computers. Penfield and others were doing ground-breaking work decades before that though. Oddly enough Penrose, Hameroff, and Chopra don't get mentioned.
Oh, and here's the Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, founded in 1989. Clearly no work being done in the field.
Keep it up though. Nothing makes wrong look worse than repeating it.
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
November 25, 2018 at 12:36 am
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Posts: 926
Threads: 0
Joined: November 10, 2018
Reputation:
0
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
November 25, 2018 at 12:42 am
Posts: 844
Threads: 3
Joined: November 16, 2018
Reputation:
15
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
November 25, 2018 at 12:50 am
(November 25, 2018 at 12:42 am)Everena Wrote: (November 25, 2018 at 12:34 am)Paleophyte Wrote: From the Quora answer that you clearly didn't read: "The difference mainly has to do with emphasis, and there is a lot of overlap."
From Wikipedia: "Neuroscience (or neurobiology) is the scientific study of the nervous system."
Guess where "neurobiology" redirects to.
While I was there I clicked on "Cognitive Neuroscience", because that's such a challenge. The historical section goes back to the 19th century, but you might want to give Phrenology a pass. The field took off in the 1980s with the advent of MRI and CT scanning abilities linked to computers. Penfield and others were doing ground-breaking work decades before that though. Oddly enough Penrose, Hameroff, and Chopra don't get mentioned.
Oh, and here's the Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, founded in 1989. Clearly no work being done in the field.
Keep it up though. Nothing makes wrong look worse than repeating it. That's great and you went way off topic too. Nothing changes the fact that consciousness was ignored for the most part by neuroscience for decades and I already posted proof of that.
Off topic?  There's an entire journal dedicated to nothing other than the topic exactly when your gurus are claiming the field is empty. Cognitive neuroscience is taking off a decade before they start whining that consciousness is being ignored by neuroscience. That's just further evidence of their cluelessness. 
Posts: 926
Threads: 0
Joined: November 10, 2018
Reputation:
0
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
November 25, 2018 at 12:55 am
(November 25, 2018 at 12:50 am)Paleophyte Wrote: (November 25, 2018 at 12:42 am)Everena Wrote: That's great and you went way off topic too. Nothing changes the fact that consciousness was ignored for the most part by neuroscience for decades and I already posted proof of that.
Off topic? There's an entire journal dedicated to nothing other than the topic exactly when your gurus are claiming the field is empty. Cognitive neuroscience is taking off a decade before they start whining that consciousness is being ignored by neuroscience. That's just further evidence of their cluelessness.
The Journal wasn't dedicated to consciousness studies though. I just looked at it and it's all about learning and communication and memory and attention. I don't see one thing about consciousness.
Posts: 2755
Threads: 8
Joined: November 28, 2014
Reputation:
22
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
November 25, 2018 at 1:04 am
(November 24, 2018 at 5:08 pm)Everena Wrote: (November 24, 2018 at 4:00 pm)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: *Nods* Yup, righty-o. Moving along now.
Agreeing with your assertion that your Overmind can do anything it wants to. Litterally anything at all its whims desire.
Next respons, please. 
Not at work. Response to what?
You've given the opinion/are happy with the idea that your Overmind can do litteraly anything it wishes. It can create something even it can't move/eat/whatever.
Your Overmind can 'Not care' about the definite speed of light that would seem to exist in our reality. Hence, it can interact with everything every where when ever and how ever it wishes. With no limits.
I'm okay with this.
Now, what other properties do you believe your Overmind has?
Not at work.
Posts: 844
Threads: 3
Joined: November 16, 2018
Reputation:
15
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
November 25, 2018 at 1:12 am
(November 25, 2018 at 12:55 am)Everena Wrote: (November 25, 2018 at 12:50 am)Paleophyte Wrote: Off topic? There's an entire journal dedicated to nothing other than the topic exactly when your gurus are claiming the field is empty. Cognitive neuroscience is taking off a decade before they start whining that consciousness is being ignored by neuroscience. That's just further evidence of their cluelessness.
The Journal wasn't dedicated to consciousness studies though. I just looked at it and it's all about learning and communication and memory and attention. I don't see one thing about consciousness.
Keep singing that song. You username is a portmanteau of Eveready Bunny and Macarena isn't it?
|
