Another reason to accept evolution.....

[robvalue]

Is "some random insane person on the internet agrees with me" accepted as evidence these days?

[Angrboda]

First of all, you didn't post pages and pages of information that show that humans have minds, you posted a google search, which, in addition to being simply a dishonest debate tactic, wasn't even relevant to the question you say it was, as the search terms you used were, "humans aspect physical mental spiritual," which pulled up all sorts of woo and crap which wasn't even relevant to the question of whether we have a mind or not.  So that's a double fail, a moronic google search instead of actual evidence, and even that google search wasn't relevant.

Second, proving that we have mind is irrelevant to the question of whether there is a non-physical aspect to humans unless you can show that mind is necessarily non-physical.  Otherwise, showing that we have mind, even with the right search terms, is not evidence that there is a non-physical aspect to humans.  That's a non sequitur.

Now, before I leave you to compose your next inane bunch of bullshit, be forewarned that posting "google searches" is not evidence and if you again post a google search in lieu of evidence, I'll simply tell you to shove it up your ass.  Google searches are not evidence.  Doubly so when you haven't even examined the search results to assure that they're even relevant.  So, fuck off with this "pages and pages" nonsense.  All you did was try to cheat your way out of actually having to provide evidence.

Well, well, well...........

Atheists always glorify science (physical science) as the royal jelly of information but when this science contradict them then this science by a magic touch automatically become non science.

How bizarre yog.
Even the mind that is an abstract entity which is behind touch, smell, sight, taste need to show that is a non physical aspect of humans.
Total madness yog.
You now reach the low of low and you dug so deep in the mental sewer that it will  be very very hard to come out the hole in which you choose to be.

Congratulation yog.






Now you have become the queen of all fools.  

Oh, look. More trash talk. Shame you don't have any evidence to go with it.

[Ravenshire]

Is "some random insane person on the internet agrees with me" accepted as evidence these days?

Yes!
















But, only if your a backwards thinking nutjob.

[Little Rik]

Well, well, well...........

Atheists always glorify science (physical science) as the royal jelly of information but when this science contradict them then this science by a magic touch automatically become non science.

How bizarre yog.
Even the mind that is an abstract entity which is behind touch, smell, sight, taste need to show that is a non physical aspect of humans.
Total madness yog.
You now reach the low of low and you dug so deep in the mental sewer that it will  be very very hard to come out the hole in which you choose to be.

Congratulation yog.






Now you have become the queen of all fools.  

Oh, look.  More trash talk.  Shame you don't have any evidence to go with it.

It can be rather romantic to think that the driver is part and parcel of the car or the mind is part and parcel of the brain-body.
Why not yog.
Being romantic keep you alive inside a soft cocoon of fantasy after all.    

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

It can be rather romantic to think that the driver is part and parcel of the car or the mind is part and parcel of the brain-body.

Strawman, as drivers and cars are shown to exist apart from each other.  Just as one may be described as a carpenter even when not in the act of crafting something out of wood, one may be described as a driver even when there isn't a car in sight.  No one has ever observed a mind without a brain.

The likelihood of the mind surviving the destruction of the brain is exactly equal to 70mph surviving the wreck of the car.

Boru

[Angrboda]

Oh, look.  More trash talk.  Shame you don't have any evidence to go with it.

It can be rather romantic to think that the driver is part and parcel of the car or the mind is part and parcel of the brain-body.
Why not yog.
Being romantic keep you alive inside a soft cocoon of fantasy after all.    

You can save your car and driver analogies until you actually demonstrate that the relationship between the mind and brain is similar. Until then, you're just jacking off.

Oh, and look. More trash talk. You aren't moving your case along any with this bullshit. All you're doing is showing people that you're an empty headed moron with nothing better to say. But as you like. We can do this all day and it won't prove anything. And at the end of the day we'll be left with the inescapable conclusion that you're an irrational twat with no reason for his beliefs other than religious dogma. But then, sitting on your ass accomplishing nothing is something I hear you have a lot of experience with. So it will be nothing new for you.

[The Grand Nudger]

I never really got why people so inclined enjoyed the car and driver bit.  If that;s how things work....it immediately begs the question of who is driving the mind car.

[Abaddon_ire]

LR, can you provide any example of a mind absent a physical brain? Bet you can't/

[Ravenshire]

LR, can you provide any example of a mind absent a physical brain? Bet you can't/

Bullshit NDE claims in 3.... 2.... 1....

[Little Rik]

LR, can you provide any example of a mind absent a physical brain? Bet you can't/

Can you see any mind next to these bodies?  

---

It can be rather romantic to think that the driver is part and parcel of the car or the mind is part and parcel of the brain-body.
Why not yog.
Being romantic keep you alive inside a soft cocoon of fantasy after all.    

You can save your car and driver analogies until you actually demonstrate that the relationship between the mind and brain is similar.  Until then, you're just jacking off.

Oh, and look.  More trash talk.  You aren't moving your case along any with this bullshit.  All you're doing is showing people that you're an empty headed moron with nothing better to say.  But as you like.  We can do this all day and it won't prove anything.  And at the end of the day we'll be left with the inescapable conclusion that you're an irrational twat with no reason for his beliefs other than religious dogma.  But then, sitting on your ass accomplishing nothing is something I hear you have a lot of experience with.  So it will be nothing new for you.

Ah,ah,ah..........so I not moving my case eh?  

What about you yog?





When you have ever tried to move your many cases such as...........THE CONSCIOUSNESS IS A PRODUCT OF THE BRAIN...........WITH THE PHYSICAL DEATH IS ALL OVER........THE UNIVERSE CAN DO WITHOUT A GOD BECAUSE ENTROPY CAN RUN THE UNIVERSE..............RELIGIONS AND SPIRITUALITY ARE THE SAME THING..........

Many many Christmas have gone by and I still wait for your evidence.  



1) My case by the way is easily proven by the fact that consciousness is an abstract entity while the body-brain is not.
There is no evidence of whatsoever that physical death is also the death of the consciousness.
In fact there is evidence on the contrary.
2) Consciousness-energy are behind death.
Science itself tell us that it is not possible to get rid of energy so if energy never die also consciousness follow the same rule because the two can not exist by themselves.  

(color mine)