Geocentric Earth

[Haipule]

So what your saying is that during a new moon the moon is being eclipsed by earth? Because the moon orbits the earth. So, no reflection. Therefore, not visible to the naked eye. And because, only the earth facing the moon could see it otherwise, anyway, only with a enhanced eye looking in the correct place. I'm cool with that. 

But then, I should be able to see the new moon, using a telescope, when I am rotated to face the eclipsed new moon. Of course, the other side of earth has no chance at such an observation. How am I doing so far?

Who said anything about an eclipse?  The moon isn't being occluded, it simply isn't in the proper position to shine by light reflected by the Earth.

Boru

Got it! Thank you! I never knew how complicated this is until I looked into it. I'm sure it is complicated to me because I am ignorant some call stupid. I thought this was easy peasy! It may be easy to you but, to me, it makes no sense! I'm going to have to examine some models of the orbits in their plains. I have to visualize this until it is easy peasy. Thank you for your time and leadership.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

If you're serious about trying to understand it, try this:  Get a directional lamp (one of those gooseneck things is perfect), some sort of wall hanging (a picture will do) and you. The experiment is best conducted in a small room.

Phase A:

1.  Turn on the lamp.

2.  Point the lamp at the picture.

3.  Stand directly between the lamp and the picture.  That's an eclipse.

Phase B:

1.  Turn on the lamp.

2.  Point the lamp anywhere but at the picture.

3.  Stand wherever you like.  This is what is known as 'not an eclipse'.

Phase C (requires additional equipment):

1. Turn on the lamp.

2.  Point the lamp away from the picture.

3.  Turn on the dozen 40 million candlepower arc lamps you purchased in preparation for the experiment.

4.  Try to see the picture.  This is why it is all but impossible to see the new moon during daylight hours.

Hope this helps.

Boru

[Gawdzilla Sama]

During a new moon the sun is shining on the other side. This isn't a hard concept. The moon doesn't have to line up between the Earth and Sun for this to happen. You do know that a "new moon" doesn't last very long, right? About a day, that's all. It happens every month.

[Amarok]

Don't have a tizzy Tiz! I'm trying establish that theology and science are two sides of the same stupid coin of "knowledge" all gleaned from the universities of "How to be a moron". All taught by "PHD's" who only learned how to suck mental dick of a PHD so they can have a "PHD"! 

What is the difference between theology and science? NOTHING! As stupid is what stupid thinks. There is a vast difference between knowledge and understanding.


Nature is a hippy chick, from Pa'ia, with hairy arm pits saying, "peace and love"! "Interplay and symphony"!


If you can't accept her simple modality: then you will only invent rocket science! Yet, every rocket is sent according to a egocentrism model of the universe! WHY?

Don't fuck with the hippy chick!

And you respond with another unhinged rant

[Haipule]

If you're serious about trying to understand it, try this:  Get a directional lamp (one of those gooseneck things is perfect), some sort of wall hanging (a picture will do) and you. The experiment is best conducted in a small room.

Phase A:

1.  Turn on the lamp.

2.  Point the lamp at the picture.

3.  Stand directly between the lamp and the picture.  That's an eclipse.

Phase B:

1.  Turn on the lamp.

2.  Point the lamp anywhere but at the picture.

3.  Stand wherever you like.  This is what is known as 'not an eclipse'.

Phase C (requires additional equipment):

1. Turn on the lamp.

2.  Point the lamp away from the picture.

3.  Turn on the dozen 40 million candlepower arc lamps you purchased in preparation for the experiment.

4.  Try to see the picture.  This is why it is all but impossible to see the new moon during daylight hours.

Hope this helps.

Boru

I love this dude! Help me more with full moon. The earth is in between the moon and the sun. So that the moon is furthest from the sun. Yet, the moon is full as a reflection. Yet, is that the reflection of the light that the earth emanates(for lack of a better word) by itself independent of the sun's light? If true, then earth must be a light giving body.


So then, what is light? It must be an electro magnetic wave and not a photon of magic unicorn dust! I do not belong to the Cult of Bombarding Particles. Nature must be waves interacting within a field and NOT particles
in bombardment!

Therefore, illumination is the truth and emittance is the lie!


There are two things I want to know. The vibration of light in full spectrum, and the vibration of sound in full spectrum beyond the obvious of ultraviolet, visible and infrared; and beyond subsonic, audible and ultrasonic. 


Why? Because I am beginning to understand that sound and light vibration can effect magnetism but I don't know how? 

If I can't understand the principles of diamagnetism and magnetism: I cannot understand dielectric and electric, capacitance, on and on etc and etc.

I will some day be able to understand this so that I can turn nature upside down. Then I will ask: "What's Up!"

My greatest teachers so far are bees, dragonflies and beetles NOT calculus! Those little critters SCREAM, "What's Up!"

[Angrboda]

I think you should drink more.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

"The earth is in between the moon and the sun. So that the moon is furthest from the sun. "

LOL.

[Anomalocaris]

If you're serious about trying to understand it, try this:  Get a directional lamp (one of those gooseneck things is perfect), some sort of wall hanging (a picture will do) and you. The experiment is best conducted in a small room.

Phase A:

1.  Turn on the lamp.

2.  Point the lamp at the picture.

3.  Stand directly between the lamp and the picture.  That's an eclipse.

Phase B:

1.  Turn on the lamp.

2.  Point the lamp anywhere but at the picture.

3.  Stand wherever you like.  This is what is known as 'not an eclipse'.

Phase C (requires additional equipment):

1. Turn on the lamp.

2.  Point the lamp away from the picture.

3.  Turn on the dozen 40 million candlepower arc lamps you purchased in preparation for the experiment.

4.  Try to see the picture.  This is why it is all but impossible to see the new moon during daylight hours.

Hope this helps.

Boru

I love this dude! Help me more with full moon. The earth is in between the moon and the sun. So that the moon is furthest from the sun. Yet, the moon is full as a reflection. Yet, is that the reflection of the light that the earth emanates(for lack of a better word) by itself independent of the sun's light? If true, then earth must be a light giving body.


So then, what is light? It must be an electro magnetic wave and not a photon of magic unicorn dust! I do not belong to the Cult of Bombarding Particles. Nature must be waves interacting within a field and NOT particles
in bombardment!

Therefore, illumination is the truth and emittance is the lie!


There are two things I want to know. The vibration of light in full spectrum, and the vibration of sound in full spectrum beyond the obvious of ultraviolet, visible and infrared; and beyond subsonic, audible and ultrasonic. 


Why? Because I am beginning to understand that sound and light vibration can effect magnetism but I don't know how? 

If I can't understand the principles of diamagnetism and magnetism: I cannot understand dielectric and electric, capacitance, on and on etc and etc.

I will some day be able to understand this so that I can turn nature upside down. Then I will ask: "What's Up!"

My greatest teachers so far are bees, dragonflies and beetles NOT calculus! Those little critters SCREAM, "What's Up!"

You shall be taught as an example in class rooms for ages.

[Haipule]

I love this dude! Help me more with full moon. The earth is in between the moon and the sun. So that the moon is furthest from the sun. Yet, the moon is full as a reflection. Yet, is that the reflection of the light that the earth emanates(for lack of a better word) by itself independent of the sun's light? If true, then earth must be a light giving body.


So then, what is light? It must be an electro magnetic wave and not a photon of magic unicorn dust! I do not belong to the Cult of Bombarding Particles. Nature must be waves interacting within a field and NOT particles
in bombardment!

Therefore, illumination is the truth and emittance is the lie!


There are two things I want to know. The vibration of light in full spectrum, and the vibration of sound in full spectrum beyond the obvious of ultraviolet, visible and infrared; and beyond subsonic, audible and ultrasonic. 


Why? Because I am beginning to understand that sound and light vibration can effect magnetism but I don't know how? 

If I can't understand the principles of diamagnetism and magnetism: I cannot understand dielectric and electric, capacitance, on and on etc and etc.

I will some day be able to understand this so that I can turn nature upside down. Then I will ask: "What's Up!"

My greatest teachers so far are bees, dragonflies and beetles NOT calculus! Those little critters SCREAM, "What's Up!"

You shall be taught as an example in class rooms for ages.

True that and so SHALL you be! My good friend. 'Spian me then the flight of a bee. "Well Bill, they flap their wings back and forth and turn them over." So that explains how a bee can fly 20mph plus in a perfectly straight line? This is known as the "bee line" flight. Well, they ain't hopping on flowers there.

Guess what genius: I am the only asshole on planet earth to come to understand the "Bee Line Flight"!

They are using available resources of the field and NOT flying in any sense of known flight! If a bee cannot fly: they walk! Read a book!

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

You seem to be as arrogantly ignorant about bees as you are, about...well...everything.

Boru