It depends on who she works for. If she works for democrats then she should stay as far away from all future elections as possible. If she works for republicans, then running is the best thing she could do for her bosses.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 24, 2024, 5:27 am
Poll: Should Hilary run in the next election This poll is closed. |
|||
Yes she is experienced and won the popular vote | 2 | 9.52% | |
No she has too much baggage and did not win the EC | 12 | 57.14% | |
I'm indifferent to her running | 7 | 33.33% | |
Total | 21 vote(s) | 100% |
* You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
Thread Rating:
Should Hilary Run In The Next Election (The Unbiased Version)
|
If you can't win against the worst dumbass that has ever run for president then stay down.
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!
(July 20, 2018 at 7:49 am)chimp3 Wrote: If you can't win against the worst dumbass that has ever run for president then stay down. She would have been a great president, and while she did make some big errors in tactics, like not hitting the swing states and picking Tim Kane, it is more for me, not that she couldn't have, but more to what divisions could crop up again. I have the same attitude about Bernie too. 45 played really dirty too. He is a great con artist, but a dumbass as a diplomat. Dems need new blood. We need smooth like Obama or Michelle but also someone who can appeal to rust belt and red states. NO, not red state bigots, but red state liberals. Oklahoma has had a democratic governor a few years ago, and MONTANA currently has a Democratic governor. If Dems simply rely on our old haunts and don't play offense and don't expand our map, we will always end up in second place. If we can beat Koch money with Obama twice then we can compete at the local level in every state, but we have to want it. And we have to stay united and pick our battles. There is far too much at stake with the shithole in office to insist on purity tests.
Though it may mark me as ageist, I'd like to see the Democrats put up someone under 70.
No love for Kamala Harris yet, eh?
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
RE: Should Hilary Run In The Next Election (The Unbiased Version)
July 20, 2018 at 8:54 am
(This post was last modified: July 20, 2018 at 8:54 am by Brian37.)
Hillary should not run in the next election. She should run FROM it.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
(July 20, 2018 at 1:11 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Hillary should not run in the next election. She should run FROM it. Again, I think she would have made an awesome president. But just like Bernie, while they like each other personally, their supporters respectively had too many "all or nothing" morons. I think Bernie would have made a great president too.
I also think she would have made a terrific president, but she's unelectable. If she couldn't beat Trump, it's doubtful she could beat anyone.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
(July 20, 2018 at 1:55 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: I also think she would have made a terrific president, but she's unelectable. If she couldn't beat Trump, it's doubtful she could beat anyone. I agree, not because she is evil, or couldn't do a good job. But unfortunately in our age of media, it would be nice to have substance override everything, but she never looked comfortable like Obama or JFK or Reagan, on the campaign trail. But I disagree that she could not have won this last time. If she had selected Bernie I bet things would have been different. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)