Ontological Disproof of God

[brewer]

J.  I have explained all about the IQ thing.  I don't give a flying fuck about my IQ, what I am into is language as thought. I am not bragging about my fuckin goddamn fucking IQ, any chip on my shoulder was put there by the horrid and vicious way in which I have been treated by members for the past three weeks.  I honestly cannot see myself continue to attempt to interact with a group of persons so delusionally stuck on the notion that the world contains trolls, and, thereby, are urgently willing to continue their lynch-mob approach to a noble minor deity, who can dethrone the Christ, in the pursuit of crucifying the dude via a their horridly delusional troll-construct.  Let us see what our equally barbaric staff decides.  I think it a good idea to, once I hit 75%, secrete nothingness between myself and a very horrible and dangerous  series of violent cave dwellers incapable of peaceful reason;--- why would anyone want to continue an association with such a series of paranoid schizophrenics whom continually throw one into the schizophrenogenic double bind ? !  Negatio

Uses the word schizophrenic, has no clue. 

Constant repetition is an indicator of dementia.

[Whateverist]

Oh well.  No one can expect you to work under these conditions.  Can't say you didn't try though.  Your posts were monumental.  But nothing is worth this kind of disrespect.  Go now, with your dignity intact.  Please.

Yes! Leaving us all with unbearable guilt and shame.

I know I shall feel entirely overwhelmed by shame.  But don't blame yourself in your capacity as staff, LP.  You can only do your duty by the lights God gives you.  

---

---

[KevinM1]

You know what I think?

Tort

[negatio]

emjay
I have not looked at the disclaimer.

Nothing prior or subsequent to Sentence three can obviate the very clear meaning of Sentence three. If the owners wanted Sentence three obviated, they would have erased the sentence, however the sentence still stands, and, all the staff and members who have broken the rule, by insulting Negatio, for three weeks, up to and including now, have a very personal interest in denying that the sentence is saying what it has said. Because, they, themselves can, then, be busted for violating the rule by insulting a new member. Kit and KevinM1 saw what the rule is saying, else, they would not have sent it to me, for my use.

[The Grand Nudger]

Do you have anything to add, or any alterations to make, in your ontological disproof of god?

Have you really thought through the idea of anyone being able to be busted for anything if rules are ineffective?

[negatio]

Abaddon
Wrong, twisted, misinterpreting with every response. Absolutely no one on the forum, except Kit and Kevin see what Sentence three is setting forth I. e., NO INSULTING on the forum, you are only still here because staff will not enforce the rule, because Staff too relishes the sport of insulting new members, outside of the introductions forum, in order to goad new members into responding in kind, which is precisely what you, personally, did to me in the immediate past.
None of you want to admit to the actual meaning of Sentence three, because you want to continue, in future, dishing out insult to new members, as you have always done, and will always do, because it is shiggles, kix, for deluded-troll-seeing nut cases !

The persons who frequent this thread are totally incapable of doing rational interaction regarding the constructs employed by the OP, all the series of persons who frequent this thread are capable of is flippantly asserting insult, somehow thinking such insult rises to criticism of the OP, and the subsequent modification of part of the OP. Some rationality entered-in, only to tell me to get the fuck outa-here, and, then, when he authentically engaged, he, Vulcanlogician, went away edified. Most of the regulars who frequent this thread are limited to telling me how I can better write and organize the OP, with absolutely no background in existential phenomenological ontology, that is okay, for such is simply the way it is. Member lack the education , reflection, and intellectual instrumentation to follow the OP, and, as an existentialist, I must take full responsibility for the current state of affairs; however, astounds me is that adult human beings can be so totally damn mean and hateful about what is, at bottom, theory, so the theory ought, like I have consistently been saying, be attacked, not the author thereof.

I personally, as an American, cannot either countenance or stomach being within a state of affairs which is an absolute Hitlerian tyrannical absolutism, wherein one's every move is observed for the sake of the future infliction of radically unreasonable and unjust punishment, in Kafka style. Where the hell is the forum's country of origin, East Germany 1956 ? ! Negatio.

[emjay]

emjay
I have not looked at the disclaimer.

Nothing prior or subsequent to Sentence three can obviate the very clear meaning of Sentence three.  If the owners wanted Sentence three obviated, they would have erased the sentence, however the sentence still stands, and, all the staff and members who have broken the rule, by insulting Negatio, for three weeks, up to and including now, have a very personal interest in denying that the sentence is saying what it has said. Because, they, themselves can, then, be busted for violating the rule by insulting a new member. Kit and KevinM1 saw what the rule is saying, else, they would not have sent it to me, for my use.

You're wrong, again. Read it:

Atheist Forums (hereafter also referred to as "the website", "the site", "the forums", "atheistforums.org") reserves the right to enforce the following rules on its membership according to staff interpretation. This disclaimer is put in place to allow the spirit of the rules to trump any literal interpretation of the rules. The wording of these rules is chosen to decrease the number of misinterpretations, however they do arise and the final determination on how to interpret these rules is left to the staff. Nonetheless, discussion of potential changes to these rules is always welcomed and encouraged.

my bold

So even if you were right with your uber-literal interpretation of the rules, which you're not, the above disclaimer still trumps it.

[LadyForCamus]

emjay
I have not looked at the disclaimer.

Nothing prior or subsequent to Sentence three can obviate the very clear meaning of Sentence three.  If the owners wanted Sentence three obviated, they would have erased the sentence, however the sentence still stands, and, all the staff and members who have broken the rule, by insulting Negatio, for three weeks, up to and including now, have a very personal interest in denying that the sentence is saying what it has said. Because, they, themselves can, then, be busted for violating the rule by insulting a new member. Kit and KevinM1 saw what the rule is saying, else, they would not have sent it to me, for my use.

[Abaddon_ire]

Abaddon
Wrong, twisted, misinterpreting with every response. Absolutely no one on the forum, except Kit and Kevin see what Sentence three is setting forth I. e., NO INSULTING on the forum,

Wrong yet again.

you are only still here because staff will not enforce the rule, because Staff too relishes the sport of insulting new members, outside of the introductions forum,  in order to goad new members into responding in kind, which is precisely what you, personally, did to me in the immediate past.

Wrong yet again. I remain here because I respect the house rules. You will garner a ban if you persist to not respect the rules. Once again, I have a warning level of zero and you, well the accumulation is telling.

None of you want to admit to the actual meaning of Sentence three, because you want to continue, in future, dishing out insult to new members, as you have always done, and will always do, because it is shiggles, kix, for deluded -troll-seeing nut cases !  Negatio.

Nope, simple fact is that you are constitutionally incapable of grokking plain english.

All of this is inflicted on Negatio by Negatio. How hard is this?

ETA: Why exactly should I care about a random internet twonk that lied about me, lied about this forum, lied about his very own posts?

Explain that?

[Losty]

Losty,
We need sort out the "troll'' insult.  I have just posted something on the insult in the special thread.

I cannot go back to considerations regarding my theories while under the constant and horrid ongoing insult that is being constantly, mistakenly, deemed a troll ! Negatio.

If you cannot handle insulting language or backlash, then this may not be the place for you. Consider moving to a gentler forum with less insulting. Might I suggest 4chan or YouTube comment section.